Even as Mainstream Media militantly denies chemtrails as covert climate modification, China openly operates a weather modification bureau and planned to use it during the 2008 Olympics. More…
Max Bliss is well-suited to attend the AAAS Conference in San Jose, CA More…
Zurich Switzerland: Disturbing reminder than chemtrails contain exotic bio-engineered “bugs” as man-made pathogens and Morgellons. More…
POSTED 9/23/2013: In 2013, the IPCC released its assessment of the state of climate science that was more dire than their 2007 assessment.
Draconian claims asserted that Global warming is “unequivocal” and humans are the “dominant cause” to a certainty of 95%.
James Corbett at The Corbett Report dissected the IPCC hype to examine the criminal behavior and conclusions that betray the scientific method.
A recent book by Climatologist, Tim Ball goes further to reveal the criminal intent behind what he calls in his book:
“The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science”
“These are clouds which are seeded by jets dumping aerosols into the upper atmosphere” – Jasper Kirkby, PhD.
Jasper Kirkby’s presentation to an audience of peers at CERN makes it clear that IPCC climate scientists, Geoengineers and government agencies have no room for claiming “denial” or ignorance that jet aircraft are dumping aerosols into the atmosphere with the effect of deliberately altering the climate.
Jasper Kirkby is a particle physicist currently engaged with cloud physics research at CERN – the European Organization for Nuclear Research.
This video excerpt makes a strong point that contrails and high thin clouds are significantly contributing to global warming/climate disruption no matter if you believe they are derived from combustion as water vapor or sprayed from jet aircraft as “aerosol dumps”.
In an article published in the journal NATURE” Kirkby reports that cosmic rays “seemed to enhance the production of nanometre-sized particles from the gaseous atmosphere by more than a factor of ten.” He added, however, that the particles in question are far too small to serve as cloud condensation nuclei.
Dr. Joyce Penner’s statement in the TV News clip echos the 1999 Climate Change Publication – “IPCC SPECIAL REPORT ON AVIATION AND THE GLOBAL ATMOSPHERE” (PDF), page 17:
“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”.
So jet aircraft are dumping chemical aerosols high in the atmosphere to create artificial contrails that spread into thin, high artificial clouds that your TV meteorologist has been told to misrepresent by telling the public they’re only “ice crystals”.
Dr. Kirkby’s comment confirming that jet aircraft are dumping aerosols into the atmosphere reveals that this covert geoengineering and chemtrail operation is well known by government agencies like NASA, NOAA, the FAA, – the IPCC climate scientists being paid to churn out climate change propaganda and geoengineers like David Keith, Ken Caldeira and their boss, Bill Gates.
The public needs to demonstrate their outrage at the massive conspiracy of government secrecy that allows these toxins and bio-weapons to rain down on global populations.
Complete One Hour Lecture
Abstract: The current understanding of climate change in the industrial age is that it is predominantly caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gases, with relatively small natural contributions due to solar irradiance and volcanoes. However, palaeoclimatic reconstructions show that the climate has frequently varied on 100-year time scales during the Holocene (last 10 kyr) by amounts comparable to the present warming – and yet the mechanism or mechanisms are not understood. Some of these reconstructions show clear associations with solar variability, which is recorded in the light radio-isotope archives that measure past variations of cosmic ray intensity. However, despite the increasing evidence of its importance, solar-climate variability is likely to remain controversial until a physical mechanism is established. Estimated changes of solar irradiance on these time scales appear to be too small to account for the climate observations. This raises the question of whether cosmic rays may directly affect the climate, providing an effective indirect solar forcing mechanism. Indeed recent satellite observations – although disputed – suggest that cosmic rays may affect clouds. This talk presents an overview of the palaeoclimatic evidence for solar/cosmic ray forcing of the climate, and reviews the possible physical mechanisms. These will be investigated in the CLOUD experiment which begins to take data at the CERN PS later this year.
Advance to Minute 44:00 for the “Jets dumping aerosols” segment.
Download the 220 page Chemtrails manual in PDF Format HERE (Large 28 MB file. Use right-click method to download)
Details or original DoD Chemtrails Document:
Chemtrails: Chemistry 141 and 142, Fourth Edition CB (Applications and Concepts in Chemistry) by Usafa
Publisher: Addison Wesley Publishing Company (1998-03)
Spiral-bound – Sales Rank: 4847383
Product Demensions: 10.8 x 8.9 x 0.5 inches
Later editions of this textbook are now available online. See BookFinder4U or Google Search by ISBN number = ISBN: 0201306840
NASA Scientist Confirms “there’s different kinds of chemtrails”
NASA’s Doug Rowland is the only person to use the word “chemtrails” in this phone conversation. At 1 minute into the video Doug Rowland clearly states:
“There’s different kinds of chemtrails as you probably know”
The intent of Sue’s call to NASA was not about chemtrails at all. Sue never used the word “chemtrails” but was concerned about the lithium releases from the rocket experiment.
In fact, it was Rowland’s gratuitous use of “chemtrails” that was entirely appropriate since “chemtrails” is a contraction of “chemical trails” – a term historically used by NASA to describe chemical releases from rocket experiments (Chemical Aspects of Upper Atmosphere Research )
Rowland’s suggestion that there are “different kinds of chemtrails” reveals a range of scenarios where chemtrails are the result of chemical releases from various sources including rockets and jet aircraft.
It is now clear that the USAF academy pilot training manual entitled “Chemtrails” is a direct reference to releases of chemicals and heavy metals into the atmosphere from a variety of modes including rockets, jet aircraft , artillery or other methods.
Note: For comparison, Sue is not heard using the word chemtrails at any time in the original 7 minute version. (Video)
NASA’s historical use of the term “chemical trail”:
The familiar aviation term “contrail” is a contraction of the two words “condensation” and “trail”.
Similarly, a “chemtrail” is a logical application of the contraction rule where two similar words, “chemical” and “trail” are spliced together as a single recognizable word.
The term “chemical trail” became part of the NASA lexicon when published in the document “Chemical Aspects of Upper Atmosphere Research”. Excerpt below:
“Langley research center released tetramethyl-lead vapor trails in lower heterosphere”
“Thus, in the search for a satisfactory chemiluminescent agent, the Langley Research Center released tetramethyl-lead vapor trails in the lower heterosphere during two night-time (early morning) experiments on January 22, 1964. In each experiment about 22 Ibs of liquid Pb(CH 3) were carried aloft by the type of rocket shown in figure 6. The visible chemical trail extended from an altitude of about 89 km. to 113 km…”
Source: NASA: “Chemical Aspects of Upper Atmospher Research” Published May 8, 1964, Page 6 and 7
By Richard A. Hord and Harold B. Tolefson (PDF)
Atmospheric scientist, Jasper Kirkby points to a photo of chemtrails to confirm covert climate engineering accomplished with aerosol dumps from jet aircraft and ship trails.
In the first example Dr. Kirkby says jet aircraft are dumping aerosols high into the atmosphere. He then says that ship tracks are also seeding clouds with extra aerosols. Referring to both aerosol operations he summaraizes: “This is where we generate several hundred percent super-saturation” (of aerosols).
Kirkby confirms the aerosol dumps are a covert operation when he concludes:
“We have to say instantly that this is a non-natural condition”
There is no doubt aerosols are being deliberately and covertly dumped into the atmosphere with the result of super-saturating the atmosphere with cloud condensation nuclei.
Contrary to rumors of “conspiracy theory”, the Department of Defense invented and published the term, “Chemtrails” in 1990 as the title to a chemistry manual for new pilots attending the esteemed US Air Force Academy. With the manual funded by the American taxpayer, the term “chemtrails” continues to be used by observers to describe unusual jet aircraft or rocket emissions.
In etymological terms, the origin of a word is very important. Regardless the intended definition, history clearly shows the term “Chemtrails” originated at the US Department of Defense as the title for a Chemistry manual used at the Air Force Academy cadet training program in the early 1990’s. Two editions of the “Chemtrails” manual are known to exist – A 200 page version for the 1990 Fall class and a 232 page version for the 1991 class. The course title “chemtrails” was so popular as to be adopted by the DoD for at least two academic years (1990-1991).
Definition – A: The Oxford Dictionary provides an accurate description of “chemtrails” even if they are unaware that the DoD is the “inventor” and original publisher of the word, “chemtrails”.
a visible trail left in the sky by an aircraft and believed by some to consist of chemical or biological agents released as part of a covert operation.
Origin: 1990s: blend of chemical and trail, on the pattern of contrail (Oxford Dictionary)
Definition – B: Defined as an “exotic weapon” in HR 2977, Space Preservation Act of 2001. (Gov. Doc – PDF)
Origin: Department of Defense title to a chemistry manual as required study for future pilots enrolled at the US Air Force Academy.
A Microfilm copy of “Chemtrails” is available through the Inter Library Loan system (ILL). Exhibts and chain of custody is included below.
NASA’s use of the term “chemtrails” to define releases of chemicals and heavy metals into the atmosphere is reflected in the title of the USAF Academy “Chemtrails” manual.
In 2001, US Rep., Dennis Kucinich introduced HR 2977 “Space Preservation Act of 2001”. The text of the Bill defines Chemtrails as an exotic weapon.
About the Chemtrails Manual Cover
- The Air Force Academy Chemtrails manual cover shows a flame from a Bunsen burner that appears to be producing two “trails”.
- The title of the manual “Chemtrails” is printed between the two “trails”.
- Considering the intentional graphic depicting “trails” it’s possible the Bunsen burner represents a jet engine producing “chemically” induced, persistent contrails.
- A Bunsen burner is a common piece of laboratory equipment that produces a single open gas flame which is used for heating, sterilization, and combustion.
- A test tube filled with a liquid is emptying contents into a flask.
- The remaining graphic appears to be a chemical representation for “methane” (CH4). Since Natural gas contains mostly “methane” it’s possible this symbol alludes to the fuel providing the flame to the Bunsen burner. (Natural Gas)
Method: An inter-library loan initiated by the Alachua County main library yielded a microfilm copy of the 1990 Chemistry 131 Manual used in training by the US Air force Academy. The lending institution was the William T. Young Library at the University of Kentucky as shown in the label below.
The microfilm was in acceptable condition, however the 1990 Chemtrails manual was scanned in 1992 under less than optimum conditions from a well-used original.
The Alachua County Library equipment was used to scan each of the 200 pages to digital *.TIF files. Photoshop was used to optimize each image to the smallest file size that would permit adequate resolution for on-line viewing. Each image was imported to a Microsoft Word page where the complete manual was saved to a 30 MB PDF file. (Portable Document File).
NOTE: A second edition of Chemtrails (232 pages) was published for a subsequent Fall class of Air Force cadets. (Circa 1992)
Disclaimer: The purpose of this post is to establish the term “chemtrails” was invented by the DoD and USAFA. However compelling, we resist claiming that the title and/or content is directly linked to the covert aerosol geoengineering and “chemtrails” operation that has been infecting planet earth for the past quarter century. The course content, however suggests possible methods for manipulation of the earth’s atmospheric chemistry and could be construed as a course requirement for pilots who could be engaged in deploying chemicals into the atmosphere.
A significant clue to the future US military agenda as perceived in 1990 is revealed in the chapter on “peak oil” beginning on pg. 64 titled: “Data From Analysis From Present And Future Energy Resources”.
Disclaimer: The purpose of this post is to establish the term “chemtrails” was invented by the DoD and US Air Force Academy.
However compelling, we resist claiming with absolute certainty that the title is directly linked to the obvious aerosol geoengineering aka “chemtrails” operation in increased evidence since the mid-1990’s. The content, however suggests possible methods for manipulation of the earth’s atmospheric chemistry and could be construed as a course requirement for pilots who would be engaged in deploying chemicals (chemtrails) into the atmosphere as an “exotic weapon”, as described in HR-2977 – aka “The Space preservation Act of 2001”.
A significant clue to the future US military agenda as perceived in 1990 is revealed in the chapter on global oil reserves beginning on pg. 64 titled: “Data From Analysis of Present And Future Energy Resources”.
Global Cooling is Here
Evidence for Predicting Global Cooling for the Next Three Decades
Note: In 2014, Dr. Tim Ball published: “The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science”, – a book that details the numerous violations of the scientific method and reveals the hidden truth beneath the false propaganda transmitted by Corporate Media, including NPR.
INTRODUCTION: Despite no global warming in 10 years and recording setting cold in 2007-2008, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC) and computer modelers who believe that CO2 is the cause of global warming still predict the Earth is in store for catastrophic warming in this century. IPCC computer models have predicted global warming of 1° F per decade and 5-6° C (10-11° F) by 2100 (Fig. 1), which would cause global catastrophe with ramifications for human life, natural habitat, energy and water resources, and food production. All of this is predicated on the assumption that global warming is caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 and that CO2 will continue to rise rapidly.
3/26/2013 Presentation to Washington State Senate Committee on Climate Change – In addition to evidence contrary to IPCC, Dr. Easterbrook alleges media bias and manipulation of data by East Anglia, NASA, NOAA and NSF. (TVW Original Broadcast)
Figure 1. A. IPCC prediction of global warming early in the 21st century. B. IPCC prediction of global warming to 2100. (Sources: IPCC website)
However, records of past climate changes suggest an altogether different scenario for the 21st century. Rather than drastic global warming at a rate of 0.5 ° C (1° F) per decade, historic records of past natural cycles suggest global cooling for the first several decades of the 21st century to about 2030, followed by global warming from about 2030 to about 2060, and renewed global cooling from 2060 to 2090 (Easterbrook, D.J., 2005, 2006a, b, 2007, 2008a, b); Easterbrook and Kovanen, 2000, 2001). Climatic fluctuations over the past several hundred years suggest ~30 year climatic cycles of global warming and cooling, on a general rising trend from the Little Ice Age.
PREDICTIONS BASED ON PAST CLIMATE PATTERNS
Global climate changes have been far more intense (12 to 20 times as intense in some cases) than the global warming of the past century, and they took place in as little as 20–100 years. Global warming of the past century (0.8° C) is virtually insignificant when compared to the magnitude of at least 10 global climate changes in the past 15,000 years. None of these sudden global climate changes could possibly have been caused by human CO2 input to the atmosphere because they all took place long before anthropogenic CO2 emissions began. The cause of the ten earlier ‘natural’ climate changes was most likely the same as the cause of global warming from 1977 to 1998.
Figure 2. Climate changes in the past 17,000 years from the GISP2 Greenland ice core. Red = warming, blue = cooling. (Modified from Cuffy and Clow, 1997)
Climatic fluctuations over the past several hundred years suggest ~30 year climatic cycles of global warming and cooling (Figure 3) on a generally rising trend from the Little Ice Age about 500 years ago.
Figure 3. Alternating warm and cool cycles since 1470 AD. Blue = cool, red = warm. Based on oxygen isotope ratios from the GISP2 Greenland ice core.
Relationships between glacial fluctuations, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and global climate change.
After several decades of studying alpine glacier fluctuations in the North Cascade Range, my research showed a distinct pattern of glacial advances and retreats (the Glacial Decadal Oscillation, GDO) that correlated well with climate records. In 1992, Mantua published the Pacific Decadal Oscillation curve showing warming and cooling of the Pacific Ocean that correlated remarkably well with glacial fluctuations. Both the GDA and the PDO matched global temperature records and were obviously related (Fig. 4). All but the latest 30 years of changes occurred prior to significant CO2 emissions so they were clearly unrelated to atmospheric CO2.
Figure 4. Correspondence of the GDO, PDO, and global temperature variations.
The significance of the correlation between the GDO, PDO, and global temperature is that once this connection has been made, climatic changes during the past century can be understood, and the pattern of glacial and climatic fluctuations over the past millennia can be reconstructed. These patterns can then be used to project climatic changes in the future. Using the pattern established for the past several hundred years, in 1998 I projected the temperature curve for the past century into the next century and came up with curve ‘A’ in Figure 5 as an approximation of what might be in store for the world if the pattern of past climate changes continued. Ironically, that prediction was made in the warmest year of the past three decades and at the acme of the 1977-1998 warm period. At that time, the projected curved indicated global cooling beginning about 2005 ± 3-5 years until about 2030, then renewed warming from about 2030 to about 2060 (unrelated to CO2—just continuation of the natural cycle), then another cool period from about 2060 to about 2090. This was admittedly an approximation, but it was radically different from the 1° F per decade warming called for by the IPCC. Because the prediction was so different from the IPCC prediction, time would obviously show which projection was ultimately correct.
Now a decade later, the global climate has not warmed 1° F as forecast by the IPCC but has cooled slightly until 2007-08 when global temperatures turned sharply downward. In 2008, NASA satellite imagery (Figure 6) confirmed that the Pacific Ocean had switched from the warm mode it had been in since 1977 to its cool mode, similar to that of the 1945-1977 global cooling period. The shift strongly suggests that the next several decades will be cooler, not warmer as predicted by the IPCC.
Figure 5.Global temperature projection for the coming century, based on warming/cooling cycles of the past several centuries. ‘A’ projection based on assuming next cool phase will be similar to the 1945-1977 cool phase. ‘B’ projection based on assuming next cool phase will be similar to the 1880-1915 cool phase. The predicted warm cycle from 2030 to 2060 is based on projection of the 1977 to 1998 warm phase and the cooling phase from 2060 to 2090 is based on projection of the 1945 to 1977 cool cycle.
Implications of PDO, NAO, GDO, and sun spot cycles for global climate in coming decades
The IPCC prediction of global temperatures, 1° F warmer by 2011 and 2° F by 2038 (Fig. 1), stand little chance of being correct. NASA’s imagery showing that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) has shifted to its cool phase is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes (Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007). The PDO typically lasts 25-30 years and assures North America of cool, wetter climates during its cool phases and warmer, drier climates during its warm phases. The establishment of the cool PDO, together with similar cooling of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), virtually assures several decades of global cooling and the end of the past 30-year warm phase. It also means that the IPCC predictions of catastrophic global warming this century were highly inaccurate.
The switch of PDO cool mode to warm mode in 1977 initiated several decades of global warming. The PDO has now switched from its warm mode (where it had been since 1977) into its cool mode. As shown on the graph above, each time this had happened in the past century, global temperature has followed. The upper map shows cool ocean temperatures in blue (note the North American west coast). The lower diagram shows how the PDO has switched back and forth from warm to cool modes in the past century, each time causing global temperature to follow. Comparisons of historic global climate warming and cooling over the past century with PDO and NAO oscillations, glacial fluctuations, and sun spot activity show strong correlations and provide a solid data base for future climate change projections.
The Pacific Ocean has a warm temperature mode and a cool temperature mode, and in the past century, has switched back forth between these two modes every 25-30 years (known as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation or PDO). In 1977 the Pacific abruptly shifted from its cool mode (where it had been since about 1945) into its warm mode, and this initiated global warming from 1977 to 1998. The correlation between the PDO and global climate is well established. The announcement by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) had shifted to its cool phase is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes (Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007). The PDO typically lasts 25-30 years and assures North America of cool, wetter climates during its cool phases and warmer, drier climates during its warm phases. The establishment of the cool PDO, together with similar cooling of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), virtually assures several decades of global cooling and the end of the past 30-year warm phase.
Figure 6. Switch of PDO cool mode to warm mode in 1977 initiated several decades of global warming. The PDO has now switched from its warm mode (where it had been since 1977) into its cool mode. As shown on the graph above, each time this has happened in the past century, global temperature has followed. The upper map shows cool ocean temperatures in blue (note the North American west coast). The lower diagram shows how the PDO has switched back and forth from warm to cool modes in the past century, each time causing global temperature to follow. Projection of the past pattern (right end of graph) assures 30 yrs of global cooling
Comparisons of historic global climate warming and cooling over the past century with PDO and NAO oscillations, glacial fluctuations, and sun spot activity show strong correlations and provide a solid data base for future climate change projections. As shown by the historic pattern of GDOs and PDOs over the past century and by corresponding global warming and cooling, the pattern is part of ongoing warm/cool cycles that last 25-30 years. The global cooling phase from 1880 to 1910, characterized by advance of glaciers worldwide, was followed by a shift to the warm-phase PDO for 30 years, global warming and rapid glacier recession. The cool-phase PDO returned in ~1945 accompanied by global cooling and glacial advance for 30 years. Shift to the warm-phase PDO in 1977 initiated global warming and recession of glaciers that persisted until 1998. Recent establishment of the PDO cool phase appeared right on target and assuming that its effect will be similar to past history, global climates can be expected to cool over the next 25-30 years. The global warming of this century is exactly in phase with the normal climatic pattern of cyclic warming and cooling and we have now switched from a warm phase to a cool phase right at the predicted time (Fig. 5)
The ramifications of the global cooling cycle for the next 30 years are far reaching―e.g., failure of crops in critical agricultural areas (it’s already happening this year), increasing energy demands, transportation difficulties, and habitat change. All this during which global population will increase from six billion to about nine billion. The real danger in spending trillions of dollars trying to reduce atmospheric CO2 is that little will be left to deal with the very real problems engendered by global cooling.
Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warming—it was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.
The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling, perhaps much deeper than the global cooling from about 1945 to 1977. Just how much cooler the global climate will be during this cool cycle is uncertain. Recent solar changes suggest that it could be fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. A more drastic cooling, similar to that during the Dalton and Maunder minimums, could plunge the Earth into another Little Ice Age, but only time will tell if that is likely.
Don J. Easterbrook is Professor Emeritus of Geology at Western Washington University. Bellingham, WA. He has published extensively on issues pertaining to global climate change. For further details see his list of publications
COMMENT: The Harvard study began in 1989 just as the DoD published the “Chemtrails” manual for the USAF Air Force Academy. This was followed by a significant increase in covert aerosol spraying over North America and ultimately the entire planet through 2014 with no end in sight as the covert aerosol spraying continues with unbelievable impunity.
These fine particulates are referred to as “chemtrails” by civilian observers. Lab analysis collected from many sources over the past decade confirm these aerosols regularly contain nano-particulates of the heavy metals, Aluminum, Barium, Strontium and other contaminants including bio-engineered, cross-domain organisms linked to Morgellons Syndrome.
Neurologist, Dr. Russel Blaylock predicted that aluminum in chemtrails would cause an epidemic of neurological disorders with a focus on premature dementia or Alzheimers.
Autism Risk Linked to Particulate Air Pollution
December 18, 2014
NEW YORK, Dec 18 (Reuters) – Children whose mothers were exposed to high levels of fine particulate pollution in late pregnancy have up to twice the risk of developing autism as children of mothers breathing cleaner air, scientists at Harvard School of Public Health reported on Thursday.
The Harvard study included children of the 116,430 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II, which began in 1989. The researchers collected data on where the women lived while pregnant and levels of particulate pollution. They then compared the prenatal histories of 245 children with autism spectrum disorder to 1,522 normally-developing children, all born from 1990 to 2002.
There was no association between autism and fine particulate pollution before or early in pregnancy, or after the child was born. But high levels of exposure during the third trimester doubled the risk of autism.
Evidence that a mother-to-be’s exposure to air pollution affects her child’s risk of autism “is becoming quite strong,” said Harvard epidemiologist Marc Weisskopf, who led the study, suggesting a way to reduce the risk.
It is not clear how tiny particles might cause autism, but they are covered with myriad contaminants and penetrate cells, which can disrupt brain development.
High resolution video captures release of aerosols from apparent fleet of Commercial Airlines
Chemtrails: Synthetic Alien Biology and Climate Modification Sprayed From Planes
GLOBE NEWSWIRE: “Synthetic biology is an emerging area of research and is broadly described as the design and construction of novel organisms or devices, artificial biological pathways, and the redesign of existing natural biological systems”
The History of the “Chemtrails” Assault on Global Populations
The Department of Defense invented and published the term “Chemtrails” in 1990 as title to a US Air Force Academy pilot training manual (PDF Download)
“Chemtrails” was published by the US government again in 2000 in House Resolution, HR-2977, sponsored by Ohio Congressman, Dennis Kucinich where the term is defined as an “exotic weapon”.
Far from being an internet rumor by so-called, conspiracy theorists, the term chemtrails is a military invention, bought and paid for by the American taxpayer who has earned the right to use the term to describe unusual jet contrail emissions released into the atmosphere by military aircraft as a possible “exotic weapon”.
Since documentation and dictionary definitions available in 2014 are more than sufficient to define the term “Chemtrail”, there is no longer a rational reason that an unusual aircraft emission cannot be called a “chemtrail” in order to facilitate the distinction between the appearance of a normal vs. abnormal aircraft emission.
Impromtu rule-making by a few prominent activists to stop using the term “chemtrails”, and replace it with “geoengineering” are misguided attempts to replace a “description” with a “process” that offers no appropriate substitute term for describing the unusual emissions (chemtrails). The effect of an edict to outlaw “chemtrails” serves more as a “gag order” to silence open discussion where “chemtrails” has been globally accepted as standard parlance in multiple languages throughout countries in both hemispheres.
More importantly the confusion is multiplied when the term geongineering also applies to deliberate emissions of water vapor “contrails” from aircraft engines known to increase surface temperatures by virtue of trapping long-wave radiation as found on page 7 of “Aviation and the Global Atmosphere” published by the IPCC in 1999 (PDF)
“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”
Finally there is no evidence in 2014, that internet filters have succeeded in scrubbing the term “chemtrails” from Google or other search engine requests.
This video is one of hundreds that demonstrate the sober reality of covert aerosol spraying. The use of a high quality camera capable of astronomical magnification reveals too much to be denied. This video was submitted to Climatologist, Tim Ball – author of the book: The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science following Dr. Ball’s visit to ChemtrailsPlanet.net to suggest I review his book. The stunning revelations in Ball’s book indicates his interest in climate corruption that extends into the highly trolled and covert operation of aerosol geoengineering.
The issue of chemtrails vs. contrails is explained in this simple demonstration that compares the emissions from two similar aircraft traveling at approximately the same altitude. The normal water vapor conversion to ice crystals creates a contrail that keeps up with the speed of the aircraft while the chemical aerosol trail (chemtrail) exhibits an unnatural “persistence” that stretches out towards the horizon.
Former USDA inspector, Rosalind Peterson speaks to an audience at a 2007 United Nations Global Warming session. Peterson’s information is solid for covert aerosol engineering but completely ignored by the IPCC and their corrupt scientific process as Dr. Tim Ball reveals in his book (above).
Aerospace Engineer, Coen Vermeeren evaluated extensive documentation to conclude that aerosol geoengineering, aka chemtrails is a fact. The 300 page report (Available in PDF) was commissioned by the Belfort Group in a well attended conference that included several speakers from the EU. Dr. Vermeeren’s complete 1 hour presentation is posted in the article
Retired government scientist, Cliff Carnicom began publishing technical reports of unusual aerosol emissions over the area of Santa Fe New Mexico in 1999. In 2005, Cliff produced what continues to be the most important video documentary, “Aerosol Crimes”, The content is exhaustive and covers all aspects of chemtrails including implications of electromagnetic, atmospheric conduction, weather modification and discovery of bio-engineered “filaments” associated with chemtrail aerosols sprayed from aircraft..
Cliff’s website at CarnicomInstitute contains many reports on aerosol observations and analysis through May 17, 2007, after which Cliff’s focus turned almost exclusively to research on the cross-domain bacteria (CDB), dessicated red blood cells and Morgellons syndrome – all associated with the covert aerosol geoengineering operation – aka “Chemtrails”.
Carnicom’s list of publications begins with the 1994 Senate testimony from Dr. Leaonard Cole who testified to the long history of uncontrolled, open-air military experiments using biological and chemical warfare agents sprayed across the United States where millions of people were exposed to toxins and weaponized microbes. Much of the testimony is included in Dr. Cole’s book: “Clouds of Secrecy: The Army’s Germ Warfare Tests Over Populated Areas”, published in 1989 – just as the “Chemtrails” manual was being readied for printing for the Air Force Academy pilot training program in 1990.
The Gulf War in 1990 under Bush 41, in addition to the first Air Force Academy edition of “chemtrails was also a hallmark year for Global Warming/Climate change with the IPCC’s release of the CLIMATE CHANGE – The IPCC Scientific Assessment, (PDF).
Elana M. Freeland’s startling book sifts through the confusion surrounding chemtrails versus contrails and how extreme weather is being “geoengineered” to enrich disaster capitalists and intimidate nations. Freeland’s provides a deconstruction of Bernard J. Eastlund’s HAARP patents that point to other covert agendas, such as a global Smart Grid infrastructure that enables access to every body and brain on Earth, a “Transhumanist” future that erases lines between human and machine, and Nanobiological hybrids armed with microprocessers that infest and harm human bodies.
Ben Davidson, Space weather expert and polymath at Suspicious 0bervers dissects the IPCC report to reveal a blatently biased approach that continues to ignore fluctuations in solar cycles, space energies, geological changes and “unknown-unknowns” [chemtrails], to un-scientifically restrict analysis of climate change, exclusively to man-made causes centered around geenhouse gas releases during the so-called “industrial revolution”.
It must be considered that continued aerosol spraying of alien biology could result in mass extinctions – including homo sapiens.
12/3/2014 MARKET FORECAST: Global Synthetic Biology (Bioinformatics, Nanotechnology, Gene Synthesis, Cloning & Sequencing) Market Forecast to 2018 – (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)
“Synthetic biology is an emerging area of research and is broadly described as the design and construction of novel organisms or devices, artificial biological pathways, and the redesign of existing natural biological systems”
Let’s be clear – Cross-domain bacteria (CDB) engineered by man or extra-terrestrial is an “Alien Biology” of mass destruction capable of simultaneously contaminating many terrestrial plant and animal species with threat of extinction.
We only need to review the history of Monsanto and the related demise of BEE colonies and other species to realize how the natural world is no longer sustainable to the profit satisfaction of the psychopathic Oligarchy. Spraying the skies with chemicals and alien biology is merely another way of increasing profits in a Ponzi economy.
Despite Carnicom’s 2007 published work establishing bio-engineered, cross-domain life forms are a product of chemtrails, today’s most prominent geoengneering activist websites rarely make reference to the mammoth public health issues that are arguably more dire than the current hysteria over heavy metals, ozone depletion, climate modification, floods, droughts, and concerns of arctic methane releases.
Dane Wigington, self-described, “lead researcher” at Geoengineering Watch has elected to ignore Carnicom’s decade of research on aerosols in addition to Cliff’s mountain of work on the more frightening discovery of bio-engineered, alien biology associated with “Chemtrails”.
A recognized propaganda technique for desperate perpetrators is to confess to a lesser crime in hopes of throwing the public and media off the trail. Referred to as “Limited Hangout”, this disinformation ploy is used when investigations are getting too close to the truth and threaten to expose the ultimate draconian New World Order agenda to include mind-control, depopulation, transhumanism, planetary terraforming, or a combination of all forms of enslavement.
Although no evidence exists that Geoengineering Watch is operating as a “limited hangout” we are driven to wonder why Carnicom’s discovery of planetary infection by synthetic life forms delivered by geoengineering aerosols is not a priority issue on a prominent English language geoengineering activist website.
Former government scientist, Cliff Carnicom’s 2005 documentary, AEROSOL CRIMES continues to provide the most complete description of the destructive assault and terrorism of aerosol bioengineering and geoengineering now contaminating the global environment with increasing consequences to public health and planetary sustainability.
In 2006, Dr. Randy Wymore’s research into “Morgellons Syndrome” revealed unusual fibers and skin lesions could not have been delusional parasitosis The CDC was involved for a while but ultimately engineered a coverup when Dr. Wymore’s research began to agree with Cliff Carnicom’s findings on cross-domain, bio-engineered microbes.
Cross-domain bacteria (CDB) are “alien” pathogens deliberately bio-engineered and introduced into the global environment as a New Biology not found in nature. bio-engineered CDB exhibit properties of all three basic domains of life on earth: bacteria, archaea, and eukaryote.
Sofia’s second VIDEO explains the effects of HAARP and covert applications of Electromagnetic technology in “The Dark Agenda of Chemtrails to Pseudo-Life”
Overview of the Three Domains in the “Natural” World:
1) The archaea domain CDB features exhibit extreme resistance to destruction by heat and acidic compounds. Pyrolobus fumarii, which holds the upper temperature limit for life at 113 °C (235 °F) and was found living in hydrothermal vents; species of Picrophilus, which were isolated from acidic soils in Japan and are the most acid-tolerant organisms known—capable of growth at around pH 0; and the methanogens, which produce methane gas as a metabolic by-product and are found in anaerobic environments, such as in marshes, hot springs, and the guts of animals, including humans.
2) The eukaryote domain. CDB features are fungal organisms that includes microorganisms such as yeasts and molds as well as the more familiar mushrooms. These organisms are classified as a kingdom, Fungi, which is separate from plants, animals, protists, and bacteria.
3) The Bacterium domain CDB features include any of a group of microscopic single-celled organisms that live in enormous numbers in almost every environment on Earth, from deep-sea vents to deep below Earth’s surface to the digestive tracts of humans.
♦ “ALIEN” BACTERIA: SELF-REPLICATING, SUB-MICRON, LIFE FORMS: A May 17, 2014 description of Cross-Domain Bacteria (CDB) Isolation, by Clifford E. Carnicom
♦ IS EVERYONE ON EARTH INFECTED?: Wine/Peroxide Test For Presence of CDB Pathogens:
“I state clearly again that the pathogenic forms under investigation are repeatedly showing up in the general population, regardless of whether certain “skin anomalies” [Morgellons] are present or not.” .
” the general population is involved whether they would like to know of it or not. The pathogens found have now been discovered repeatedly across all major body systems and functions, including skin, blood, hair, saliva, dental(gum), digestive, ear and urinary samples.” – Cliff Carnicom
These sub-micron sized filaments are engineered, synthetic life-forms most famously associated with “Morgellons syndrome.” – an insidious systemic disease that manifests in a small percentage of victims as bizarre skin lesions where fibers are mysteriously manufactured inside the body before erupting through the skin.
The vast majority of victims infected with CDB may manifest no skin lesions or apparent symptoms. The Carnicom group, however, has devised a simple test to determine if victims who have not yet exhibited Morgellons skin lesions have actually been infected with CDB without knowing it. The shocking results indicate that every asymptomatic volunteer who submitted to the astringent “wine test” was found to be infected with the CDB when expectorant samples were examined under microscopy.
- Is this Alien Biology engineered by humans, extra-terrestrials or a synthesis of humans and extra-terrestrials?
- Is the covert agenda to infect the Global population and other natural Earth systems with Alien Biology?
- Is the Alien Biology an agenda of “Control”, Extermination or both?
- Is an undisclosed vaccine available to protect the perpetrators from being infected with the Alien Biology?
Clive Hamilton (Australia), “Playing God with Climate”:
Comment: It’s more than disturbing that conference organizers failed to invite even one geoenginieering activist to speak about the current global aerosol operation that should be one of the foremost concerns to Environmentalists and Peace activists. Not even Veterans For Peace member Bruce Gagnon who publishes the Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space could bring himself to discuss the “Exotic Weapons” of aircraft spraying chemicals in the sky over Maine as part of a space weapons program. We need to wonder why Cliff Carnicom, or even Dane Wigington was not invited to speak.
Professor Hamilton explains how Bill Gates, the Jason Group, CIA, Raytheon and big oil companies are working on Geoengineering.
The Conference: International Forum on Globalization — TECHNO-UTOPIANISM and THE FATE OF THE EARTH, October 25-26, 2014 – Great Hall, Cooper Union, NYC
During the session “THE QUEST FOR “NEW NATURE”, Dr. Hamilton presented “Playing God with Climate”: Geo-Engineering-New Skies (Program PDF)
Do not miss available audio of all forum participants – HERE
Hamilton is a member of the Board of the Climate Change Authority of the Australian Government, and is the Founder and former Executive Director of the The Australia Institute. He regularly appears in the Australian media and contributes to public policy debates. Hamilton was granted the award of Member of the Order of Australia on 8 June 2009 for “service to public debate and policy development, particularly in the fields of climate change, sustainability and societal trends”.
“The right-wing think-tanks deny climate science but they’re interested in geoengineering, and that reveals something very important about climate science denial – that it’s not about the science.
Attacking the science is collateral damage to defend their ideology – and their ideology is a kind of thinking that likes [aerosol] geoengineering if it means controlling nature and if it means defending the economic and political system; if it means protecting the oil companies from a devaluation of their assets. They [Conservatives] like that kind of solution to climate change rather than carbon taxes, restrictions on what we can consume and destroying eighty percent of the asset value of EXXON.
So you can see why politically, the conservative think-tanks and – in private – why Republican politicians are talking about geoengineering as an answer to climate change.”
The BOOK: Earthmasters: The Dawn of the Age of Climate Engineering March 25, 2014 by Dr. Clive Hamilton
Check out our 2nd channel http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Support WeAreChange by Subscribing HERE http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…
Rep WeAreChange Merch Proudly: http://wearechange.org/store
OH YEAH since we are not corporate or government WHORES help us out http://wearechange.org/donate
We take BITCOIN too – 12HdLgeeuA87t2JU8m4tbRo247Yj5u2TVP
Climate Change more likely spurred by Planetary Geo-engineering
By LUIS MIRANDA | THE REAL AGENDA
Anthropogenic activity as the cause of planetary warming may be a hoax, but the planet is indeed getting warmer. The news here is that different from what climate alarmists have said for decades, such warming, at the rate it is happening, may not be caused by the burning of fossil fuels or industrial activity. There is a more powerful driver of global warming, and that is solar activity.
The sun has experienced lows and highs throughout its existence and so have all the planet’s temperatures. But on Earth there is a second component of global warming that is affecting the planet’s stability. Geo-engineering, which is the artificial modification of the weather over a determined area, seems to be directly responsible for the unusual weather and climate patterns seen in the last 15 years. The technique has been used for at least 60 years, the patents for the different kinds of Geo-engineering have been awarded for a long time and the application of the various types of planetary engineering have been tested exhaustively in laboratory and in open air.
The most popular of all methods of planetary engineering is the use of Chemtrails. Chemtrails are showers of chemicals poured over determined areas with the intent of affecting weather patterns. The use of chemicals such as aluminum, barium and strontium, which have been sprayed over the planet for the past 6 decades allowed military contractors to test the effects of such chemicals on weather patterns in order to produce ways to drive or control weather elements such as rain, storms, winds and others.
The project to manipulate the weather was focused on how military applications of Geo-engineering could provide advantages for the United States armed forces in any possible fight against potential enemies, but today other nations such as Russia and China also possess technology to modify the weather. The studies seem to have begun back in the 1940’s, and applications and tests began to run in the 1950’s. By injecting chemicals into the atmosphere, proponents of weather modification and its use as a force magnifier are able to make it rain, cause floods, prevent rainfall, cause droughts, create and direct storms and even cause seismic activity. (see link with list of patents).
HOW THE WARMING OCCURS — Continue
Six consecutive Lab tests from Alachua County rainwater each report Aluminum and Barium consistent with geoengineering aerosols
- Article: Welsbach Patent for Atmospheric Seeding With Heavy Metals
- Article: Neurologist Warms Aluminum in Chemtrails is a Dangerous Neurotoxin
Forestry expert, Francis Mangels is presently a professor and master gardener, growing gardens in the Pacific Northwest for 50 years. He came from farm and forest country in Montana and Idaho, to Mt. Shasta in 1981. With BS cum laude in Forestry 1970 and MS in Zoology 1976, Francis also has “minors” in many conservation and natural resource subjects: soils, geology, botany, bugs, fish, agriculture, range, wildlife, and conservation management.
Francis retired from district biologist for Mt. Shasta-McCloud USFS in 2008, where he did range, wildlife, botany, mushrooms, fisheries, and other input to timber sales and other natural resource projects for 35 years. He also was a USDA Soil Conservationist for the Soil Conservation Service and served farms, ranches, orchards, and gardens.
Francis maintains membership in over 30 conservation, arts, religious, community action, and educational groups. He plays over 50 musical instruments with a variety of other interests and pastimes, such as ancient history, ancient music, luthier, bluegrass, military history, literature, religions, astronomy, philosophy, corporate propaganda, poetry, farm engineering, practical handyman, and community sustainability. He also writes medieval romances, technical papers, and contributions to various newspaper columns.
Francis provides free services to gardens, orchards, and vineyards by his belief that local communities should become self-sustaining as soon as possible. He also believes in thrifty living and cooperative effort among townsfolk and businesses. “Everyone has something to offer; hopefully something as practical as possible.
Controversial Plans to Slow Global Warming by Manipulating Atmosphere Reconsidered by Scientists
By Jayalakshmi K – 11/18/2014
Researchers from Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) are proposing a stratospheric perturbation experiment using small amounts of sulphuric acid to block sunlight.
This involves an amount equivalent to what a commercial aircraft releases in a few minutes of flying in the stratosphere, say scientists.
It can help understand how solar radiation management can reduce heating, concentration of water vapour in the stratosphere and study the movement of water vapour.
The potential risks of solar radiation management (SRM) are substantial and are among the reasons why experts have advised against such tinkering.
“The idea of conducting experiments to alter atmospheric processes is justifiably controversial, and our experiment, SCoPEx, is just a proposal,” says David Keith, Gordon McKay Professor of Applied Physics at Harvard SEAS and a professor of public policy at Harvard Kennedy School.
“It will continue to evolve until it is funded, and we will only move ahead if the funding is substantially public, with a formal approval process and independent risk assessment.”
Rubbishing the claim that geo-engineering results cannot be verified by small-scale tests, he says experiments like theirs will help reduce “unknown unknowns” in the picture.
Another paper co-authored by Keith and collaborators at the California Institute of Technology (CalTech) collects and reviews a number of other experimental methods, to demonstrate the diversity of possible approaches.
What is geoengineering?
Geoengineering looks at ways and means to reduce global warming by direct intervention that involves increasing capacity of planktons to take in more carbon dioxide as also blocking sunlight from hitting the surface using mirrors.
Opponents have looked at these as an escape way out of tougher mitigation methods that call for a low-carbon lifestyle.
Tinkering with the atmosphere or the oceans will only encourage nations and people to continue with the fossil-fuel based economy.
Recently, the International Renewable Energy Agency had shown that not only can renewable energy meet the rising demand but it can do so cheaply, and help limit global warming to the crucial two degrees during the century.
Attempts to buy time by fixing short-term pollutants like methane and sulphur dioxide will not work, a ETH Zurich study showed.
Carbon dioxide emitted in the burning of biomass and fossil fuels lasts thousands of years in the atmosphere, trapping heat and warming the planet.
The latest IPCC report on climate change has warned that unless the shift to renewable energy is complete by the end of the century, irreversible change will have devastating consequences on the planet.
In fact, it is the irreversible nature of climate change that can be addressed by geo-engineering, say advocates like Keith. Once the planet has crossed the threshold, there will be no going back for a 1000 years and it is then that forced cooling of the atmosphere will help, they argue.
How it works
The sulphur sprayed in the stratosphere will combine with water vapour to form tiny sulphate aerosols or fine particles. These get swept upward by natural wind patterns and are dispersed over the globe, up to the poles. Once spread across the stratosphere, the aerosols can reflect back into space about 1 percent of the sunlight hitting Earth. This can partially offset the warming effects caused by rising levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Climate Engineering, space weapons, 5G, the “Internet of Things” are the tools used by the globalist cabal to implement Full Spectrum Dominance to enslave humanity and the natural world. More…
2012 – IPCC: MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION (PDF)
The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is claiming that extreme heat waves and record high temperatures this year are direct effects of climate change.Scientists for the IPCC stated:
“It is very likely that there has been an overall decrease in the number of cold days and nights, and an overall increase in the number of warm days and nights, at the global scale.”
The 592 page report (PDF) went on to claim that projected increases in magnitude and frequency of extreme events would occur in many regions. The report also predicts:
- Tropical cyclones and hurricanes will be more intense than in the past
- More heat waves and record hot temperatures worldwide
- Increased downpours in Alaska, Canada, northern and central Europe, East Africa and north Asia
Chris Field, ecologist of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, warns:
“There is disaster risk almost everywhere.”
The report specifies that US Coastal regions are in imminent danger from hurricanes and rising seas by 20 % by 2030.
Texas would be threatened by storm surges that could double by 2030. Mumbai, India could become uninhabitable because of flooding, storms and rising seas. But one point that the IPCC does not make in their report is the effects of Geoengineering on the planet.
Governments have been using weather modification to change the planet’s natural bio-spherical patterns. Chemtrails, dumping barium, aluminum, and other toxins into the atmosphere, have the effect of warming temperatures. The aluminum meant to reflect the sun’s heat out into space also traps the heat from the Earth’s surface causing a stagnant layer of extremely hot air. What scientists call the “greenhouse effect” is actually a direct causation of this geoengineering process.
Droughts are formed when the chemicals released into the air bind moisture particles in the atmosphere with over-abundance of CCN (Cloud Condensation Nuclei). This causes precipitation to be reduced in targeted areas while moving accumulated rain to flood a different region.
The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Gokona, Alaska, a collection of transmitters pointed toward the sky. The US government claims HAARP is a scientific experiment for learning about the properties and comportment of the upper atmosphere (ionosphere).
In Documents from the UN’s General Assembly on Decolonization in 2007, HAARP was designed (among other things) to cause disruption in weather patterns.
“Arecibo was also mentioned as a test-site for the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP), in a patent filed by an individual in the United States, to conducted experiments related to ionospheric manipulation. HAARP could function as an anti-missile and anti-aircraft defence system, permit interception and disruption of communications, weather and submarine and subterranean communications, among other things. The HAARP patent papers also stated that the invention could “simulate and perform the same function as performed by the detonation of a heavy type nuclear device”. – 14 June 2007 – SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON DECOLONIZATION CALLS ON UNITED STATES TO EXPEDITE PUERTO RICO’S SELF-DETERMINATION PROCESS
HAARP’s tell-tale signs have been reported just before some of the most devastating “natural” disasters of recent years.
- Electrical disturbances visible in our upper atmosphere days before earthquakes in Japan and China.
- Rippled line cloud formations caused by radio wave interference and streaking lights in the skies before the earthquakes in Chile and Haiti.
Conveniently, the IPCC is claiming man-made global warming is causing the weather patterns and problems that are developing. It benefits their agenda to blame humans for these disasters when they have plans to control the world through global governance. To gain such an immense power over the entire population, they must first make a villain out of humanity.
Al Gore and his lies about the cause of global warming have been ingeniously effective for turning the social meme to self-basement. Through carbon credits and depopulation, the UN plans to “control” the effects of global warming.
Ignoring the sun’s effects on our planet’s weather, the ties to sunspots and our earth’s temperature and that carbon dioxide has nothing to do with rising temperatures, we have been duped into joining a green movement with the hidden agenda to gain absolute governance over our lives as author, Rosa Koire writes in her book about UN Agenda-21, “The Green Mask”