SANDY HOOK: Wolfgang Halbig Prevails in Lawsuit Filed by Alias “Leonard Pozner” 2

BOOK: Nobody Died at Sandy Hook. It Was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control (Moon Rock Books)

We Are Change Orlando Reports on the Hearing

Sandy Hook Researcher, Tony Mead, sums up the Leonard Pozner vs. Wolfgang Halbig pre-trial hearing on 11/7/17.

Halbig scored a previous victory on 6/13/2015 when Newtown First Selectman, Patricia Llodra testified under oath that DHS was involved in setting up an electronic sign at the Newtown Fire Station reminding drill participants to sign-in.

11/7/17: Pre-trial hearing



History of the Pozner Lawsuit Against Halbig

Halbig/Pozner Hearing: “Who are you?”

There are many beautiful languages in the world, but the language of the court is not one of them. Never has there been a species of snake more double-tongued, slippery and capable of contorting the meaning of each word in a sentence.

Nevertheless, it’s necessary  to watch the recent pre-trial hearing between defendant Wolfgang Halbig (a Sandy Hook citizen investigator) and complainant “Leonard Pozner’s” attorney, which took place on March 28th, 2017 in the Lake County Courthouse in Florida. Necessary because it’s one of the many snake dances that followed the Sandy Hook event of 12-14-12.

The complainant, who is the parent of a child purported to have died in the Sandy Hook shootings, is suing Mr. Halbig for posting his personal information online, which consists of his name, business address, email address and phone number, already available publicly according to many sources.

The first 17 minutes is taken up with the complainant’s attorney caviling with the judge over the presence of a reporter from We Are Change. The attorney based his objection on the argument that the reporter represents “fake news.” (Now we see how that charge is going to be applied by lawyers who don’t like real people with real eyes and ears and mouths recording and interpreting their words.) Regardless, the judge allowed the reporter to record the hearing.

What’s in a name? For the real issue, which is that of the identity of the complainant, start at 57:00. Because the plaintiff has used a variety of aliases on various documents in the past (e.g., the Dickensian “Eliezer Pozner”), Mr. Halbig had asked for a copy of the plaintiff’s birth certificate to ascertain by whom he is being sued. It seems reasonable, doesn’t it? Especially since the plaintiff’s signature on a pertinent legal document (“Lenny Pozner”) differs from the name under which his suit was filed.

“This man has five, six different names,” said Mr. Halbig at one point, in reference to various aliases he found in public documents. “That’s why I think that question is relevant to my discovery. I want to know who this man really is, who’s filed a lawsuit against me.”

But the torrent of legal-speak issuing from the judge’s lips thereupon is so serpentine, so full of writhing, squirming, squeezing and cloaking language, one is left wondering if the court is in a county that speaks any English at all. “Irrelevant,” a favorite court-speak term, is lavishly deployed. But why should Mr. Halbig’s request be “irrelevant” when the very nature of the plaintiff’s allegations concern Mr. Halbig’s use of the plaintiff’s name?

So, exactly who/what is/are Eliezer Pozner? You will not find the answer on Jeopardy, nor, I’m afraid, in the court proceeding.

Orlando PULSE Shooting Follows SANDY HOOK Easily Provable HOAX 2

Christine Leinonen Fake green screen interviewNote: Open source investigation is ongoing in the case of the 2016, Orlando PULSE nightclub shootings however the contemptible US media  has featured several alleged victims and participants who are now discovered to be professional and/or crisis actors including the shooter.  Valid death certificates of the alleged deceased are needed to firmly establish who, and how many people actually died.  But regardless the number of actual deceased – substantial evidence now exists to doubt the official media “stories” and the numerous misrepresentations published as corporatist media “stories”.  Research by RedSilverj provides one good open-source investigation.  (VIDEO) 

Thanks to open source investigation by responsible alternative media researchers, there’s good reason why public confidence in TV news and newspapers is currently at a 10 year low.  See 2016 Gallup Poll

NEW YORK TIMES: Terrorist Plots “Hatched” by the F.B.I.  (Story)

In January, 2016 Mark Devlin interviewed author and publisher, Jim Fetzer, PhD.

The topic: The Obama Administration’s ongoing attempts to disarm American civilians through executive orders and congressional legislation following apparent but dubious acts of mass gun shootings.

james Fetzer PhD mug-bThe Sandy Hook school “shooting” is only one example of how the media promotes false events as real news, however the list of deep government and media treason against the American people is very long.

Fetzer’s book and this interview present evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandy Hook shooting is an easily provable hoax, drawing on the findings in his book, “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook. It was a FEMA Drill to Promote Gun Control” (Source)

Book - Nobody Died at Sandy HookA short while after publication,  brisk sales and multiple 5-star ratings, the book was suddenly banned and removed from sale by Amazon without notice.  Perhaps it’s  more than a coincidence that a new position was created at Amazon for Obama’s former press secretary, Andrew Carney as Amazon’s Senior VP for “global corporate affairs”.  Carney’s connection to the Obama administration is now forever linked to Amazon’s “book burning” of “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” – a “dangerous” book containing hard evidence of federal crimes and massive media deception.


Florida Professor Fired From FAU For Investigating Sandy Hook 1


Purchase the Book  or  (Download Free PDF Version)


James tracy mug-bProfessor James Tracy paid a heavy price for free speech. He lost his job as a tenured Professor because he dared to question the official story of the Sandy Hook Elementary event. Now he could use your help, please consider donating to his legal defense fund.  (Source: Memory Hole Blog)

James Tracy Legal Defense Fund

Stunning excerpt from sworn testimony

Newtown official testifies under oath to confirm Homeland Security (DHS) involved in setting up electronic sign:  “Everyone Must Check In”

More Evidence in Sandy Hook Investigation:  3/4/2016: Suspicions of document tampering raised when Chalk Hill School statistics discovered as identical to Sandy Hook. Was Sandy Hook closed then placed on artificial life-support by cloning reports from Chalk Hill to misrepresent Sandy Hook as an active school?  

Sandy Hook Justice Report Website

7/23/14: Arrest of Jonathan Reich for asking too many questions about Sandy Hook

Documentary “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook”

Related Articles





Year in Review: Top 20 False Flag Events of 2014 2

Veterans Today Logo

A most important video for those who may have only recently awakened to the stunning duplicity of our Government and Media.

This discussion, by two experts from academia, could send your head spinning.  Allow yourself a little over one hour to listen, then do your own research starting at Veterans Today where the information is posted with notes and sources.

Kevin-BarrettKevin Barrett,  Ph.D:   Dr. Barrett, is an Arabist-Islamologist, and one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

Kevin has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008.  He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.

Fames Fetzer Press TV HeaderJim Fetzer, PhD:   A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Was Hinkley the Reagan Assassination Hit Man For the Shadow Government? 9




John_Hinckley,_Jr._MugshotWhat is more dangerous for the future of our country than a conspiracy to assassinate a president? It is a conspiracy to manipulate and control what the American people are told by the national news media. There are scores of unanswered questions surrounding the event of the afternoon of March 30, 1981. For instance, John Chancellor, eyebrows raised, informed the viewers of NBC Nightly News that the brother of the man who tried to kill the president was acquainted with the son of the man who would have become president if the attack had been successful. As a matter of fact, Chancellor said in a bewildered tone, Scott Hinckley and Neil Bush had been scheduled to have dinner together at the home of the vice president’s son the very next night.

And, of course, the engagement had been canceled. . . Then a peculiar thing happened: The story vanished. To this day, it has never been reported in the New York Times, Washington Post or many other metropolitan newspapers, never again mentioned by any of the television news networks, and never noted in news magazines except for a brief mention in Newsweek, which lumped it with two ludicrous conspiracy scenarios as if the Bush-Hinckley connection didn’t deserve some sort of explanation.


Jodie foster 61st Academy Awards-1989

Jodi Foster

But many other significant facts concerning the Bush and Hinckley families have remained unexplored and unexplained, in addition to other matters related to the assassination. For example:

Neil Bush, a landman for Amoco Oil, told Denver reporters he had met Scott Hinckley at a surprise party at the Bush home January 23, 1981, which was approximately three weeks after the U.S. Department of Energy had begun what was termed a “routine audit” of the books of the Vanderbilt Energy Corporation, the Hinckley oil company.

In an incredible coincidence, on the morning of March 30, three representatives of the U.S. Department of Energy told Scott Hinckley, Vanderbilt’s vice president of operations, that auditors had uncovered evidence of pricing violations on crude oil sold by the company from 1977 through 1980. The auditors announced that the federal government was considering a penalty of two million dollars. Scott Hinckley reportedly requested “several hours to come up with an explanation” of the serious overcharges. The meeting ended a little more than an hour before John Hinckley Jr. shot President Reagan.

Although John Hinckley Sr. was characterized repeatedly by the national news media as “a strong supporter of President Reagan,” no record has been found of contributions to Reagan. To the contrary, in addition to money given to Bush, a fellow Texas oilman, as far back as 1970, the senior Hinckley raised funds for Bush’s unsuccessful campaign to wrest the nomination from Reagan. Furthermore, he and Scott Hinckley separately contributed to John Connally in late 1979 when Connally was leading the campaign to stop Reagan from gaining the 1980 presidential nomination. The Bush and Hinckley families, of course, would do better under a Bush presidency than it would under President Reagan.

Available evidence at the time made clear many other connections between the Bush and Hinckley families. Reported “coincidences” involving the Hinckleys and the family of H.L. Hunt also remained unexplored. Even the official government line admitted that the Bush and Hinckley families “maintained social ties.” The deeply troubled Hinckley oil company obviously would fare better under a president Bush.

The assertion by the media of course, was that the assassination attempt was nothing more than the senseless act of a deranged drifter who “did it to impress Jodie Foster.” However, that all of these “coincidences” are thoroughly ignored by the media is also suspicious. It is also essential to understand the travesty of the trial of John W. Hinckley, presided over by Judge Barrington D. Parker. In May 2001, Barrington D. Parker was one of the first eleven nominees for appointment to federal appeals courts by President George W. Bush.


<> on April 25, 2013 in Dallas, Texas.

Was there a Second Gunman?

Judy Woodruff-mug

Judy woodruff

But there’s more. NBC correspondent Judy Woodruff said that at least one shot was fired from the hotel, above Reagan’s limousine. She later elaborated, saying a Secret Service agent had fired that shot from the hotel overhang. Could Reagan’s wound have been inflicted by friendly fire? Or, more ominously, did Woodruff glimpse a bona fide “second gunman” – a la JFK in Dealey Plaza? Either way, Woodruff’s account might explain how a slug managed to strike Reagan when his limo’s bulletproof door stood between him and Hinckley. Sizing up the Hinckley-Bush nexus, conspiracy researcher John Judge has theoretically dubbed this “the shot from the Bushy knoll.”

According to conspiratologist Barbara Honegger, White House correspondent Sarah McClendon made the somewhat more subjective comment that Reagan’s Secret Service retinue wasn’t in its “usual tight formation” around Reagan in front of the Hilton. Were the Gipper’s bodyguards out to throw the game?

Hinckley on drugsThen there was Hinckley, himself. The Jodie Foster obsessed space cadet had been prescribed psychoactive drugs by a hometown psychiatrist. According to press reports, at the time of the shooting he was dosed with Valium. Before targeting Reagan (supposedly to gain the “fame” that would redeem him in the eyes of Foster and the world), Hinckley had stalked Senator Ted Kennedy and President Jimmy Carter.

He devoured books on Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy’s assassin (suspected by many conspiracy researchers to have been hypnotically programmed), and Arthur Bremer, who shot George Wallace. Theorists ask the inevitable questions: Was Hinckley a mind-controlled assassin, a Manchurian Candidate programmed to “terminate with extreme prejudice”? They point to the CIA’s longtime obsession with mind control and the fact that during the 1980 presidential primaries, Bush – the former director of Central Intelligence – enjoyed the zealous support of Agency regulars, who preferred their former boss to Reagan.

For an antisocial pariah, Hinckley sure got around. In October 1980, he had flown to Nebraska in an attempt to contact a member of the American Nazi Party. Columnist Jack Anderson later claimed that Hinckley had ties to an American faction of the pro-Khomeini “Islamic Guerrilla Army.” According to conspiracy author Barbara Honegger, a member of that group told Anderson he had warned the Secret Service about Hinckley’s designs on Reagan – two months before the shooting. If Anderson’s source is to be believed, the Secret Service did nothing to stop the Jihad-happy gunman.

The day after his Nazi-seeking mission, Hinckley flew to Nashville to stalk Jimmy Carter, but was arrested at the airport when authorities discovered three handguns in his suitcase. Oddly, after only five hours in custody, this unstable character – who had attempted to transport weapons across state lines and into a city soon to be visited by the president of the United States – was fined and released without further ado. Even more oddly, the authorities apparently didn’t bother to examine his journal, which in Dear Diary fashion, detailed Hinckley’s plans to kill Carter. Was this a case of bumbling negligence or something more ominous? Most likely they had found a perfect fall guy, similar to Oswald, to be used in some future covert operation.

The shadow government did not care for Reagan when he first ran for president. He would sometimes speak out against the Trilateral Commission, and other secret government organizations. After winning the White House, Reagan, never known for his detail oriented approach to administering, probably unknowingly allowed his cabinet to be filled with the same shadow government types he campaigned against.

However, it was still early in his first term, and the insiders still did not feel comfortable with him in the White House. The insider Bush, the ultimate brown-nose of the illuminati, was someone they could count on.

Word probably came down to Bush to proceedTrilateral Commission round-table-group-circle with the assassination attempt. At the very moment the assassination was to take place, Bush was on his way to speak before the sinister Trilateral Commission.

Reagan was no fool. He must have at least suspected what was really behind the assassination attempt. Close associates claim he was never the same again after that day. Whatever plans he may have had to go against the wishes of the shadow government, ended on March 30 1981.The remaining 8 years of his presidency, he was reduced to following orders of the secret government.

Remember:  Bush Was President During the 9/11 False Flag – an event used for the illegal invasion of two countries, authorized torture, created the Department of Homeland Security and Airport body searches.

911-twin Towers Crime Scene

Lawsuit Seeks $1 Trillion For Fraud and Terrorism in Sandy Hook Hoax 6

Filmmaker, Author, William Brandon Shanley, Sues Big Media Over Sandy Hook Hoax

Lawsuit Seeks $1 Trillion For Fraud and Terrorism in Sensationalized Coverage of “Staged FEMA Exercise”
William Brandon Shanley Mug

William Brandon Shanley

Press Release For Immediate Release
December 25, 2014
Contact: William Brandon Shanley

Great News! No Children Died at Sandy Hook!

Filmmaker and Author William Brandon Shanley Launches Wave of Lawsuits for more than $1 Trillion Against Big Media Over Sandy Hook Massacre Coverage (Amazon Books)

Here is Mr. Shanley’s Statement:

“After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments: VIDEO:   Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”

Attached is a photo staged by the Newtown Bee, a wider view of that action being staged on a different day that the emergency altogether, and a sampling of front pages that terrorized the world with the fake photo.

Staged Photo

sandy hook children school drill