Military’s New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change 3

Why In The World Are They Spraying

Washington’s New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change

Global Research, January 04, 2002
17 June 2005

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases…

The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World’s climate can now be modified as part of a new generation of sophisticated “non-lethal weapons.” Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World’s climate.

In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) as part of the (“Star Wars”) Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes. From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

While there is no evidence that this deadly technology has been used, surely the United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on the climatic impacts of greenhouse gases…

Despite a vast body of scientific knowledge, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of “weather warfare” or “environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)” as relevant to an understanding of climate change.

The clash between official negotiators, environmentalists and American business lobbies has centered on Washington’s outright refusal to abide by commitments on carbon dioxide reduction targets under the 1997 Kyoto protocol.(1) The impacts of military technologies on the World’s climate are not an object of discussion or concern. Narrowly confined to greenhouse gases, the ongoing debate on climate change serves Washington’s strategic and defense objectives.

“WEATHER WARFARE”

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists … are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.” (2) Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:

“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… [T]echniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm.”

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.”(3) These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].” (4)

A simulation study of future defense “scenarios” commissioned for the US Air Force calls for:

“US aerospace forces to ‘own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications… From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary… In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.(5)

HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (HAARP)

The High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska –jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy– is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere”. Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich –actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP– describes HAARP as:

“A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere [upper layer of the atmosphere] by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything — living and dead.” (6)

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as “a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet.” 7

MISLEADING PUBLIC OPINION

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” (8) Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of “induced ionospheric modifications” as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.9

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated weapons’ system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences:

“It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. … The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer. (10)

In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses:

“HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays… Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people’s brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out. (11)

More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World’s electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of “electronic weapons” which US military researchers consider a “gentler and kinder warfare”. (12)

WEAPONS OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.

The use of HAARP — if it were to be applied — could have potentially devastating impacts on the World’s climate. Responding to US economic and strategic interests, it could be used to selectively modify climate in different parts of the World resulting in the destabilization of agricultural and ecological systems.

It is also worth noting that the US Department of Defense has allocated substantial resources to the development of intelligence and monitoring systems on weather changes. NASA and the Department of Defense’s National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) are working on “imagery for studies of flooding, erosion, land-slide hazards, earthquakes, ecological zones, weather forecasts, and climate change” with data relayed from satellites. (13)

POLICY INERTIA OF THE UNITED NATIONS

According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro:

“States have… in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the (…) responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction.” (14)

It is also worth recalling that an international Convention ratified by the UN General Assembly in 1997 bans “military or other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects.” (15) Both the US and the Soviet Union were signatories to the Convention. The Convention defines “‘environmental modification techniques’ as referring to any technique for changing–through the deliberate manipulation of natural processes–the dynamics, composition or structure of the earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere or of outer space.” (16)

Why then did the UN –disregarding the 1977 ENMOD Convention as well as its own charter– decide to exclude from its agenda climatic changes resulting from military programs?

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ACKNOWLEDGES IMPACTS OF HAARP

In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj Britt Theorin –Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate–, the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program.(17) The Committee’s “Motion for Resolution” submitted to the European Parliament:

“Considers HAARP… by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body…; [the Committee] regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration… to give evidence to the public hearing …into the environmental and public risks [of] the HAARP program.” (18).

The Committee’s request to draw up a “Green Paper” on “the environmental impacts of military activities”, however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into “the links between environment and defense”. (19) Brussels was anxious to avoid a showdown with Washington.

FULLY OPERATIONAL

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an “unfriendly nation” or “rogue state” with a view to destabilizing its national economy.

Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of New World Order policies including market deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank “economic medicine” imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds on farmers throughout the World.

It is important to understand the linkage between the economic, strategic and military processes of the New World Order. In the above context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other “non-lethal weapons” on climate change.

NOTES

1. The latter calls for nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by an average of 5.2 percent to become effective between 2008 and 2012. See Background of Kyoto Protocol at http://www.globalwarming.net/gw11.html .

2. The Times, London, 23 November 2000.

3. Intelligence Newsletter, December 16, 1999.

4. Ibid.

5 Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report, http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/ (emphasis added).

6 Nicholas Begich and Jeane Manning, The Military’s Pandora’s Box, Earthpulse Press, http://www.xyz.net/~nohaarp/earthlight.html . See also the HAARP home page at http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/

7. See Briarpatch, January, 2000. (emphasis added).

8 Quoted in Begich and Manning, op cit.

9. Air University, op cit.

10. Rosalie Bertell, Background of the HAARP Program, 5 November, 1996,
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/envronmt/weapons.htm

11. Begich and Manning, op cit.

12. Don Herskovitz, Killing Them Softly, Journal of Electronic Defense, August 1993. (emphasis added). According to Herskovitz, “electronic warfare” is defined by the US Department of Defense as “military action involving the use of electromagnetic energy…” The Journal of Electronic Defense at http://www.jedefense.com/ has published a range of articles on the application of electronic and electromagnetic military technologies.

13. Military Space, 6 December, 1999.

14. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York, 1992. See complete text at
http://www.unfccc.de/resource/conv/conv_002.html , (emphasis added).

15. See Associated Press, 18 May 1977.

16. Environmental Modification Ban Faithfully Observed, States Parties Declare, UN Chronicle, July, 1984, Vol. 21, p. 27.

17. European Report, 7 February 1998.

18. European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy, Brussels, doc. no. A4-0005/99, 14 January 1999.

19. EU Lacks Jurisdiction to Trace Links Between Environment and Defense, European Report, 3 February 1999.

Global Warming Skeptic Marc Morano Debates Bill Nye the Science Guy on Climate Change 1

Morano and Nye

By Noel Sheppard | December 04, 2012
UPDATE: Links added to transcript to give readers background regarding scientific points made by Morano.

Global warming skeptic and founder of the website Climate Depot Marc Morano debated climate change with Bill Nye the Science Guy on CNN’s Piers Morgan Tonight Tuesday.

Video of the entire spirited discussion follows with full CNN transcript:

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: Our big story tonight, you are so hot, America. And I mean that literally. The temperature was a balmy 60 degrees this afternoon in New York just outside CNN’s studios. The average high temperature in December is normally 43. A warm front has flooded the lower 48 states with 482 daily high temperature records across the country on Monday alone. Quite extraordinary but is it evidence of manmade global warming?

That’s tonight’s “Battleground America.” Joining me now are Bill Nye, the science guy, and Marc Morano, he’s the publisher of Climatedepot.com. Welcome to you both.

BILL NYE: Thank you.

MORGAN: Let me start with you, Marc Morano, if I may. You are implacably opposed to the concept of manmade climate change. Why?

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: Our big story tonight, you are so hot, America. And I mean that literally. The temperature was a balmy 60 degrees this afternoon in New York just outside CNN’s studios. The average high temperature in December is normally 43. A warm front has flooded the lower 48 states with 482 daily high temperature records across the country on Monday alone. Quite extraordinary but is it evidence of manmade global warming?

That’s tonight’s “Battleground America.” Joining me now are Bill Nye, the science guy, and Marc Morano, he’s the publisher of Climatedepot.com. Welcome to you both.

BILL NYE: Thank you.

MORGAN: Let me start with you, Marc Morano, if I may. You are implacably opposed to the concept of manmade climate change. Why?

MARC MORANO, CLIMATE DEPOT: We followed the evidence. There are quite literally hundreds of factors that influence global temperature, everything from tilt of the earth’s axis to ocean cycles to water vapor, methane, solar system, the sun, cloud feedback, volcanic dust. The idea that CO2 is the tail that wags the dog is not supportable.

And if you go down and look at the scientific literature, we are finding reams of data. And new peer-reviewed study showing the Medieval and Roman warming periods as warm or warmer than today without our CO2 emissions. So what’s happened here is the whole movement, because now we’ve gone 16 years without global warming, according to the U.N. data [from UK Met Office], and they’ve now morphed into extreme weather.

And we have the absurd spectacle of people claiming that acts of Congress and United Nations can control the weather and make hurricanes less nasty and make tornadoes less frequent, which by the way none of them are showing any trends at all that are unusual.

MORGAN: OK. Bill Nye, your response?

NYE: Well, we start talking about the facts, those —
MORANO: Those are the facts.

NYE: Medieval warming period and the Roman warming period, those are just in Europe. And they’re representative.

(CROSSTALK)

NYE: Let’s see if we can agree on a couple of things. Do you agree that when I was a kid or when you were a kid, there was 340 parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?

MORANO: Sure. Carbon dioxide is rising. What’s your point?

NYE: OK.

MORANO: No.

NYE: So here’s the point, is it’s rising extraordinarily fast. That’s the difference between the bad old days and now is it’s —

MORANO: Carbon dioxide —

NYE: It’s much faster than ever in history. And so —

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: Yes, let him finish, Marc. Let him finish.

NYE: No. So that’s — it’s the rate that’s of great concern more than the actual —

MORGAN: And what do you put that rate down to, Bill?

NYE: It’s human activity. I mean you go back — this is what I say all the time. So you look in the ice and you find bubbles of trapped gas from 200 years ago, let alone 1,000 years ago. There’s nobody running around with a hypodermic needle injecting bubbles of gas in ancient ice cores. I mean you — that’s the ancient atmosphere in there so you can determine the composition — ancient atmosphere exactly.

This Medieval Warming Period is brought up quite often but it was really a European phenomenon and it’s not — it was global.

MORGAN: And what are the biggest factors, the manmade factors creating the acceleration of CO2 in the atmosphere?

NYE: Well, the biggest thing is when I was 9 years old, the earth’s population changed from 2.999 billion to three billion. Now it’s — in my lifetime, it’s now seven billion. People trying to live the way we lived in the developed — way to live in a developed world and it’s just — we’re just burning — burning carbon and spewing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere at an extraordinary rate.

(Note on overpopulation claims: see Fred Pearce on ‘The overpopulation myth’: Population growth is slowing…The idea that growing human numbers will destroy the planet is nonsense‘ and ‘Grist Mag. Going Down: Is too few people the new ‘population problem?‘)

MORGAN: Well, so Marc Morano, if there is a massively increased acceleration in CO2 in the atmosphere at the same time that there’s been a bigger than double the sizing of the population of the planet, why would that not be inexorably linked? Explain to me.

MORANO: CO2 is rising. No one is disputing that. What Bill and I just did was waste everyone’s time explaining that CO2 is rising. The question is what impact does CO2 have on the weather, what impact the CO2 have on climate change. And that, as we you look at the geologic records, we’ve had warmer periods where it’s been — with higher — with lower CO2 and we’ve had colder periods with higher CO2. And you have to go way back for some of that but the bottom line is hundreds of factors are dictating our climate.

The Medieval Warm Period was both southern and northern hemisphere. On my Web site there’s literally [scores of studies] — it demolishes the idea of a hockey stick, new peer-reviewed study, so the idea that Bill Nye is just going around saying CO2 is up, therefore global warming is dangerous, we should be concerned, it’s not. It’s not dangerous. The bottom line is all these factors —

MORGAN: Well, let me — let me —

MORANO: — dwarfs the effects of CO2.

MORGAN: OK. Let me jump in. Let me jump in. How do you explain that the Eastern Seaboard, for example, is getting some of the warmest weather it’s ever had at the same time that California has been plunged into storm after storm in the last week and you see New York last month had the worst hurricane it’s ever endured and so on and so on?

MORANO: Sure. Great.

MORGAN: How do you explain that we’re getting so many of these freakish weather patterns if at the same time you’ve got all this extra CO2 in the atmosphere and all these people now guzzling up power and energy and emitting gases that weren’t there before?

MORANO: No.

MORGAN: Surely that is evidence, isn’t it?

MORANO: No. You go to the peer-reviewed literature. You’re looking at anecdotal evidence. This is now the level of your daily horoscope. Basically global warmists like Bill Nye say global warming will cause many bad weather events and guess what? Bad weather events happen all the time so people look and they say look, there’s more proof, there’s a bad weather event.

Bottom line, big tornadoes, F-3 and larger since 1950s have dropped dramatically. Bottom line, we’ve gone the longest period without a major U.S. category 3 or larger hurricane hitting the U.S. since 1900, maybe the civil war.

Bottom line, new study in the “Journal Nature,” peer-reviewed, no change in U.S. drought in the last 60 years. Bottom line, a new study out shows that drought has not changed in 85 to —

MORGAN: OK. Let me give you —

MORANO: Hundred and 26 years.

MORGAN: Before —

(CROSSTALK)

MORGAN: Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Let me add one more — let me add one more bottom line before I defer to Bill Nye.

MORANO: Sure.

MORGAN: He knows more about this than I do. But another bottom line, the world is indisputably getting warmer. The U.N. Weather Agency said last week 2012 is on track to become one of the top 10 hottest years on record. And all the weird climactic changes we’re seeing.

Bill, over to you.

NYE: This is a — this will be the hottest two decades in — in recorded history. And so when you throw around a statement like the U.N. says it’s not the hottest 20 years —

(CROSSTALK)

2010 tied for “hottest” year? It is “purely a political statement.” Even NASA’s James Hansen admits it is “not particularly important.”

NYE: I got to disagree with you. There may be some surface data shows that in certain cities.

MORGAN: Well, here’s my point to you, Marc. It’s a straightforward one, really. If you are wrong, then the implications for the planet are utterly catastrophic. In other words, if you and the climate change —

MORANO: Not at all.

MORGAN: Well, let me finish. If the anti-climate change brigade win the argument and nothing is done because you convince people nothing needs to be done and you’re wrong, then in 100, 200 years, we’ll have caused devastation for the planet that will then be irretrievable.

If, however, you are right in what you say and this is unnecessary and overreaction and so on, what you’re seeing is a bit of economic hardship in the short term to deal with what may not be as big a problem as you think it is.

MORANO: Why it’s the wrong argument? Because every proposal ever done including the United Nations Kyoto Protocol would not even detectibly impact the temperatures assuming you buy into their science. What we’re talking about —

NYE: We’re not talking about the temperature.

MORANO: We’re talking about a climate bill in the United States. President Obama was going around telling people it will keep the planet four or five degrees cooler for our grandchildren. His own EPA said it wouldn’t affect global CO2 levels let alone temperature. And if you actually do —

NYE: CO2 —

(CROSSTALK)

MORANO: Right now the developing world is getting 1,000 plus coal plants, there are 1.3 billion people don’t have running water and electricity. If we actually go the route of trying to stop carbon- based energy which has been their lifeline, which would lower infant mortality and long life expectancy, it would be the most immoral position you can take. So the bottom line is even if the skeptics are wrong the solutions that the global warming alarmists have proposed would have no detectible impact on climate.

MORGAN: Let me let Bill Nye respond to that. NYE: If we — if we were to begin to reduce carbon emissions, have the United States, for example, lead the way in this new technology, especially energy transmission, energy storage, electricity, we could change the world. We could get everybody a much higher quality of life than they’d otherwise have. The problem is so many people live near the coasts and these are — they are very old economic reasons.

People lived on rivers since the beginning of human history, so as sea levels — as the world gets warmer and I take it he doesn’t disagree that the world is getting warmer —

(CROSSTALK)

NYE: So ice is also falling off the ice sheets so that ice is up on land. This is also going to cause the sea level to rise. So, for example, in the case of Sandy, which was not an especially big hurricane, the economic impact was $30 billion and that’s in the developed world where we have the resources to deal with it.

When you have people displaced on a continental scales, these are — we’re not talking about a few people trying to get through a fence at a border between countries. We’re talking about 30 — tens of millions of people trying to move north, trying to move out of Southeast Asia. You’re going to have trouble.

MORANO: Where — when is this happening? This is —

NYE: So the sooner you get started on that problem, the better.

MORANO: These are all predictions based on climate models —

NYE: Well, our argument is —

(CROSSTALK)

MORANO: These predictions of Bill is based on climate models —

NYE: I appreciate your yelling. That’s good.

MORANO: … that violate 81 one out of 87 of the basic principles of forecasting.

NYE: So —

MORGAN: Marc Morano, do you accept that the ocean levels are rising, that the planet is getting hotter, that CO2 emissions have dramatically increased in the last 50 years, and —

NYE: And ice sheets are shrinking.

MORGAN: Ice sheets are shrinking and the planet population is doubling and accelerating at a terrifying rate, and that the combination of all these things is likely to be a major problem for the next two or three generations, and therefore, doing nothing shouldn’t really be a sensible responsible option.

MORANO: Doing nothing — first of all the United States did nothing, our CO2 emissions are dropping as we move to fracking away from coal through technology so the idea of nothing — there’s nothing to do. The idea of — there’s no way you can solve a nonproblem. Sea level has been rising since the end of the last ice age. There’s no acceleration. The Dutch Meteorological Institute said there’s no acceleration. You can look at the data, the land base data.

NYE: Boy, I just —

MORANO: There’s no acceleration of the sea level.

NYE: We just don’t agree on the facts. So we’re not going to get anywhere.

MORANO: Where it goes — the scary and where the horror story is in all these predictions. And they come out and say it’s worse than we thought. Why —

MORGAN: Well, I respect —

MORANO: Because the predictions get scarier and scarier.

MORGAN: OK. Look, I respect that you have views. I don’t think they’re facts and there are many scientists who would take issue with you about the use of the word facts.

NYE: Based on studying Venus —

MORGAN: I’m going to have to wrap it up, I’m afraid. It’s been a spirited debate. And I appreciate you both coming on.

MORANO: Thank you.

MORGAN: Marc Morano and Bill Nye. I’m sure it will rumble on. Thank you.

About the Author

Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Noel Sheppard on Twitter.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/12/04/climate-realist-marc-morano-debates-bill-nye-science-guy-global-warmi#ixzz2EOvIZ7eq

HAARP and Military Geoengineering Weapons Are Capable of Creating Global Warming Hoax 1

HAARP Facility

Holes in Heaven

HAARP Heats the Ionosphere With a Billion Watts of Power

HAARP has the ability to work  with a number of ionospheric heaters installed in a global matrix to create covert acts of climate change activities that mimic what the IPCC refers to as global warming with the capability to create real arctic ice melts.

At one time there were only 2 ionospheric heaters on earth but in 2012 there are many devices all over the planet.  When powerful ionospheric heatters are not coordinated or are used in weather warfare between countries the result can be catastrophic to the environment.

HAARP has the capability to cause atmospheric and environmental changes.

HAARP and Military Geoengineering Weapons Are Capable of Creating Global Warming Hoax

____________________________________________

____________________________________________

This documentary examines the controversial military program based on Tesla technology – its possible effects on weather and use in mind control. H.A.A.R.P. is a scientific research facility, located near Gakona, in the remote Alaskan outback and is a joint Navy and Air Force project.

This facility is used to study the earth’s Ionosphere, the electrically-charged belt surrounding our planet’s upper atmosphere, ranging between 40 to 60 miles from its surface.

More specifically, H.A.A.R.P. is a controversial high frequency radio transmitter, or “ionospheric heater”. The military intends to use this billion-watt pulsed radio beam in our upper atmosphere, which will create extremely low frequency waves, or ELF waves.

This technology will enhance communications with submarines and will allow us to “see” into the Earth, detecting anything from oil reserves to hidden underground military targets. H.A.A.R.P.’s roots can be traced back to work of Nikola Tesla, a Yugoslavian scientist, who’s achievements include the Tesla Coil or “magnifying transmitter” which is still used in televisions and radio today.

Project HAARP: http://mysticalmusingsandpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/01/project-haarp.html
The Geo-Engineering Conspiracy: http://mysticalmusingsandpolitics.blogspot.com/2011/02/geo-engineering-conspi…

HAARP - VLF Wave Injection Experiments

More Geoengineering Weappons now at the South pole

 

Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri Presents Chemtrails at Global Warming Conference 1

As expected, the Global Warming conference hosted by the Massachusetts Law School found almost all attendees ignorant of “chemtrails” and covert geoengineering.

Environmental writer, former university professor and scholar, Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri, is the author most recently of The Uterine Crisis. This book is the result of 15 years of her independent research linking women’s reproductive illnesses with invisible environmental toxins. London’s “The Ecologist” magazine calls this book “an inspiration.” Dr. Perlingieri continues to take a cross-disciplinary approach to all her research. She has a background in both science and art. In addition to her graduate academic degrees, she also has had formal herbal training and studies in the US, London, and Italy. She is a practicing herbalist for more than three decades; and she notes that plants and herbal remedies have thousands of years of safe usage and are an excellent choice….More

Perlingieri Chemtrails Video

Click Here to begin at Perlingieri’s presentation

Radiation Support for Your Immune System: We are Under Invisible Siege (Part 1)
Posted by Brian Andrews Featured, Remedies Friday, April 1st, 2011

Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri. “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” ~Franklin Delano Roosevelt

I have had countless calls asking for more suggestions on how we can support our already compromised immune systems, as we are exposed daily to untold levels of radioactive elements that are now traveling world-wide. Due to our already highly polluted air, we now have a multi-pronged attack on our immune systems. We were never meant to be sponges for an assortment of highly hazardous and unregulated chemicals and nano-technology, genetically modified organisms, aerosolized Chemtrails, pesticides, and artificial and poisonous additives to our food supply. This has been going on for most of the twentieth century; and now laws, in place for decades to protect us, have been gutted…..More

__________________________

Radiation & Chemtrails Assaults: Additional Support for Your Immune System (Part 2)
Posted by Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri Wednesday, May 18th, 2011

We are now living under daily radiation, chemical and biological siege. Because so much of this is invisible, it may be difficult for many people to comprehend the enormity of what is happening throughout our environment. The on-going catastrophe at Japan’s Fukushima ruined nuclear reactors continues to affect our entire planet. From the very beginning and behind the scenes of this epic crisis, the real reasons were deliberately covered-up. Safety factors were omitted, citizens

continue to be put in harm’s way in Japan, throughout North America, and the rest of the planet. Mainstream Orwellian news is worthless in terms of reporting the magnitude and real dangers involved; so the public has never been properly informed. As with the on-going BP Gulf of Mexico oil-rig catastrophe, all we get as citizens are distortions and deception. Safe ways of handling this nightmare or real precaution were deliberately not part of any “emergency” plan  ….More

.

.

UN Climate Conference: A Trojan Horse for Global Government 1

Marc Morano Interview – ClimateDepot.com

________________________________________

Selected excerpts from November 26, 2012:

By Marc Morano  –  Climate Depot

Morano: “Climate activists think we need more taxes & regulation to somehow stop bad weather…Mayor Bloomberg said we need to take immediate action to prevent bad weather. This has now reached the level of the Mayan Calendar and Nostradamus.

The NYT has picture of stature of liberty underwater and warming of the end times. This is not science, this is the doomsday stuff of the Mayan calendar and we have no business masquerading it as science. When I was in U.S. Senate Environment & Public Works Committee, I got to go to Bali, S. America, Africa, My r/t ticket to Kenya in 2006 was $16,000 business class. The UN likes exotic locals…

To use Hurricane Sandy as the poster child for global warming — as the UN and Gore are now doing –makes as little sense as you can possibly imagine. We have gone longest period since the Civil War without a major cat 3 or larger hurricane to hit the U.S. If anything, global warming would prevent — at least Atlantic hurricanes — from making landfall.

The World Meteorological Organization said there is no evidence of a human footprint in hurricane activity. For warmists to pick hurricanes as a poster child means they are completely devoid of science. Obama said Americans can ‘do something’ about floods, hurricanes, droughts tornadoes, as though, you can at the ballot box, you vote yourself better weather. They are implying we can legislate better weather.”

WWW.CLIMATEDEPOT.COM

______________________________________

______________________________________

Interview with UN Climate Change Enforcer, Christiana Figueres

The top UN global warming climate change negotiator Christiana Figueres, who is in charge of arm-twisting industrialized countries to fight greenhouse gas emissions, framed her real agenda in plain language that everybody can easily understand.

These are her actual words, as reported by the Washington Examiner:

Christiana Figueres, who leads the United Nations negotiations to cut greenhouse gas emissions, described the climate change she seeks as a world-encompassing “revolution” engineered by “centralized” governments.

“We are inspiring government, private sector, and civil society to [make] the biggest transformation that they have ever undertaken,”

Figueres, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, commented in an interview published by The Guardian last week.

WWW.CLIMATEDEPOT.COM

UN Climate Talks Promise to Create New Global Mandate on CO2 Emissions 2

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
November 27, 2012  Original Article

The UN Climate Change Conference (UNCCC) has begun in Qatar, Saudi Arabia. Alarmists and eco-fascists have gathered from more than 200 nations for two weeks of talks that demonize greenhouse emissions and the nations that emit the most.

This conference endeavors to create a new global climate mandate that will be finalized by 2015 and go into effect internationally in 2020.

Earlier this month, in a new study published by the World Bank, there is a call for “stepping up efforts” to meet the global carbon reduction levels to avert catastrophic consequences that would cause of the planet’s temperature to rise an estimated 4 degrees Celsius before the end of the century.

Alarmists like Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank, decry lowering CO2 emissions must be reduced before the temperature threshold is crossed and “widespread crop failures and malnutrition and dislocate large numbers of people from land inundated by rising seas.”

Kim is trying to coerce sovereign nations to adopt UN mandates on carbon emissions by urging world leaders to become aggressive with eco-friendly planning in developing countries to offset their impact on the environment.

Jonathan Pershing, US delegate attending the UNCCC, claims that Obama and the US deserve more credit for attempting to curb American CO2 emissions. Pershing said: “Those who don’t follow what the US is doing may not be informed of the scale and extent of the effort, but it’s enormous.”

Newly re-selected President Obama recently announced his commitment to “tackle the issue of climate change.”

In his victory rally speech, Obama explained that he did not believe it was fair to “burden” our children to live in a world that is “threatened by the destructive power of a warming planet.” The day after Obama was declared Commander-in-Communism, he asserted that instilling carbon taxes would “help cut the US budget deficit.”

Beginning at $20 per metric ton of carbon dioxide tax, which would be raised 6% annually would be “applied to the Congressional Budget Office’s 2012 baseline, this would halve the fiscal deficit by 2022.”

The UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is proud to be working with Obama and continuing enterprises to confront global climate change. Ban said: “. . . the United Nations will continue to count on the active engagement of the United States on these and other crucial issue as it strives to meet the hopes and expectations of people around the world.”

______________________

Addressing the media on the opening day of the Doha Climate Change Conference, UNFCCC Executive Secretary, Christiana Figueres, outlined the objectives of the conference, including a renewed commitment under the Kyoto Protocol.

______________________

At the UNCCC talks, the issue of funding to “fight and defend against climate change” became an issue with only two days of discussion thus far. The UN is expecting a contribution to the tune of $100 billion from developed nations for projects that will manifest in 2020.

The references to “fast-start finance” have created tension between the UN and developed nations that have not delivered the monies promised. In June, at the UN Conference on Sustainable Development Rio+20, governments and private sector corporations have pledged to fund the UN’s endeavors toward global governance with a generous $513 billion for Agenda 21 project that will restrict the movements of humans, perverse biodiversity and assist the UN in attaining their Millennium Development Goals.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was thrilled that so much money had been given to the UN. “These huge numbers give a sense of the scale and growth of investment going into sustainable development. They are part of a growing global movement for change. Our job now is to create a critical mass, an irresistible momentum.”

Corporations like PepsiCo, and Virgin’s CEO Richard Branson project Carbon War Room are receiving $2 billion from the US government. Academia and universities in places like Beijing, Sydney, Paris and New York will conduct and fund Agenda 21 projects on mega-city sustainability. Most of the $1 trillion allotted will go to projects in turbine, solar, biofuel and geothermal energy.

The European Union, US Japan and other nations have given $23.6 billion so far to the UN, according to the International Institute for Environment and Development; (IIED) however even this falls short of the amount promised and frustrates the UN for demanding funding. Funding for the UN is being deposited at HSBC in London.

The IIED plans to use the UNCCC to exact propaganda against humanity for the betterment of the planet. Their hope is to initiate “steps . . . towards reaching a global agreement that can shift us off our current inexorable trajectory towards unprecedented global warming.”

Another mode of the IIED is to motivate citizens in developed nations to clamor for climate change mandates and pressure their governments to comply with the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) suggestions. By networking with local members of communities and deliver ideology that can be implemented at the local level, climate change advocacy can reach a new level of influence.

Eco-fascists are also hoping to make ecocide the next punishable crime that would legally force humanity to conform to the mandates of Agenda 21 or suffer the consequences.

Ecocide is defined as “the extensive damage to, destruction of or loss of ecosystem(s) of a given territory, whether by human agency or by other causes, to such an extent that peaceful enjoyment by the inhabitants of that territory has been or will be severely diminished.”

The demonization of humanity is central to ecocide where human effects on the planet are classified as unsustainable and having irreversible consequences; hence requiring a criminal mandate that can be internationally enforced to protect the planetary boundaries of our world.

The Law of Ecocide promises to “prosecute those who destroy the planet.” And when made a legitimate legal mandate, alarmists and eco-fascists will finally have the judiciary standing to unilaterally prevent any atrocities perpetuated upon the planet by corporation or individual.

While these fanatics complain that governments have yet to “intervene to make the destruction of our world a crime” the law enforcement and justice system of sovereign nations have their hands tied. With the advent of a global mandate, those nations would be forced to adhere to global governance and punish those found guilty by international law.

Defined in the proposed Ecocide Act, all nations, corporations and individuals would be “under the principle of superior responsibility” and legal obligation to “ensure their actions do not give rise to the risk of and/or actual extensive damage to/or destruction of or loss of ecosystem(s).”

http://occupycorporatism.com/un-climate-talks-promise-to-create-new-global-mandate-on-co2-emissions/

Doomsday Scare Tactics on Global Warming to Impose Carbon Taxes and African Land Grabs 2

World Bank Study: To Avoid Doomsday Reduce CO2, Carbon Taxes & African Land Grabs

*********************************************************************

Click Here to Read The Article That Reveals the Basis for the Global Warming Hoax

*********************************************************************

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
November 20, 2012

In a new study published by the World Bank, there is a call for “stepping up efforts” to meet the global carbon reduction levels to avert catastrophic consequences that would cause of the planet’s temperature to rise an estimated 4 degrees Celsius before the end of the century.

Alarmists like Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank, decry lowering CO2 emissions must be reduced before the temperature threshold is crossed and “widespread crop failures and malnutrition and dislocate large numbers of people from land inundated by rising seas.”

Kim is trying to coerce sovereign nations to adopt UN mandates on carbon emissions by urging world leaders to become aggressive with eco-friendly planning in developing countries to offset their impact on the environment.

The threat of rising sea levels, a common tactic of eco-fascist, promises to limit the amount of fresh water access, cause drought and unbearable heat in areas not normally exposed to such extremes; as well as promotes disease while simultaneously reducing the amount of food accessible to the world’s population.

Rachel Kyte, vice president of sustainable development for the World Bank warns: “The kind of sea level rise we are talking about is going to make the process of urban planning and services to the poor absolutely fundamental. The race to heat resistant and drought resistant strains [of staple food crops] becomes fundamental.”

In 2011, at the conference for the Carbon Initiative for Development, (CID) the focus of under-developed nations was first and foremost as the BioCarbon Fund (BCF) was discussed as a way to give those nations access to agriculture and energy with sustainability in mind. The BCF is setting the guidelines for countries like Moldova to purchase carbon credits in a scheme to force governments to tax citizens for breathing.

In conjunction with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the CID is seeking to convince African nations that they must strictly consider climate change and adopt measures to mitigate its effects in households and farming systems to increase productivity.

Since May of this year, corporations and foreign governments have been land-grabbing from third world nations to control agriculture.

Nations like Ethiopia, South Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo and Sierra Leone, in Africa have been pressured into signing agreements with multi-national corporations and foreign investors, allowing them to control agricultural land. The nation’s leaders believe that giving access to their resources will benefit their people; however this is just another manipulative ploy to coercively acquire control over land, food production and securitization.

The United Nations (UN) has enacted global guidelines on purchasing agricultural land from developing nations like Africa and Asia. The UN claims that to secure equality for the poor and disadvantaged, this international body must control their lands through the allowance of multi-national corporations and governments who will develop the land for agriculture and securitize the crop yields; thereby giving the UN control over the global food supply.

The Copenhagen Consensus 2012 project has combined the expertise of Nobel laureates to define prioritization and economic principles to create proposals for international policy reform.

The issues researched were:

• Armed conflicts
• Biodiversity
• Population growth
• Food and Water Securitization
• Natural disasters
• World hunger
• Global warming

Cost benefits and the allocation of funding were outlined. The expert panel spoke in Denmark to coerce climate change conference attendees that these investment proposals should be enacted immediately.

President Obama showed his support of the UN’s African land grab by announcing that he has a $3 billion plan to securitize Africa’s food supply and agricultural farms. Obama wants to use Africa as a base for growing the world’s food supply, under his controlled initiatives.

Rajiv Shah, head of the US Agency for international Development (USAID) praises the President’s plan. “We’re very excited. It really is the culmination of years of effort on behalf of African leaders, on behalf of entrepreneurs, this Administration, partners in the G8 and many, many others including the private companies that are joining this private-public partnership.”

Andrew Mitchel, secretary of state for the UK’s International Development department remarked: “Governments cannot tackle this challenge alone. The skills, resources and financial expertise of leading private businesses will help transform African agriculture, giving poor farmers the chance to pull themselves out of poverty, hunger and malnutrition.”

To coincide with this new initiative, Obama created the Global Development Council (GDC); a new commission that is promoting global growth and expansion through international initiatives.

The purpose of the council is to advance the US government’s “national security objectives: security, prosperity, respect for universal values, and a just and sustainable international order.” Funding for the GDC dictates their policy with the engagement of financial partners and beneficiaries as well as stakeholders.

 

Don’t Think The US Military Is Concerned With The Climate? Think Again 4

By Dane Wigington –  Geoengineeringwatch.org

There are still a great many people that cant bring themselves to imagine that the mighty US military would have much if any concern with the state of global climate. Many that can not even begin to believe that the same US military would be actively involved with ongoing climate modification “Manhattan Projects” (global geoengineering programs, SAG and SRM). The glaring reality is that climate change, and the manipulation of the global climate system, are a top priority for the US military.

All available data indicates that the US military has been experimenting with weather modification for over 60 years. A document drafted in 1966 recently located from the NASA archives outlines the ongoing and expanding US weather modification programs at that time. These programs were well funded having budgets in the hundreds of millions of dollars even then.

So what is the US military and its NATO allies doing to mitigate the risk of climate change? They are fully engaged in massively destructive global geoengineering programs. SRM (solar radiation management) and SAG (stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) are likely only a part of the lethal aircraft spraying programs going on above our heads day in and day out.

The links below illustrate a few of the existing documents and articles regarding the US military and its urgent concern over the state of global climate. These links are of great relevance to this article and should be examined.

1 – CLIMATE CHANGE AS A NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERN (12-29)
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=14682&page=12

2 – CLIMATE CHANGE, VULNERABILITY, AND NATIONAL SECURITY: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK (30-45)
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=14682&page=30

3 – POTENTIALLY DISRUPTIVE CLIMATE EVENTS (46-63)
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=14682&page=46

4 – HOW CLIMATE EVENTS CAN LEAD TO SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STRESSES (64-79)
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=14682&page=64

5 – CLIMATE EVENTS AND NATIONAL SECURITY OUTCOMES (80-117)
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=14682&page=80

6 – Office of the Director of National Intelligence
http://www.dni.gov/index.php/about/organization/national-intelligence-council-nic-publications

7 – NY Times Article on threat of climate change to Pentagon
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/science/earth/09climate.html?pagewanted=all

The damage being done by these completely unregulated and out of control climate modification programs ( SRM, SAG, and other potential programs as of yet unknown) can not be quantified.

Below are some of the known consequences of global geoengineering programs.

Greatly reduced overall global rainfall.

Completely disrupted global hydrological cycle

Loss of blue skies and direct sunlight, thus effecting photosynthesis

Greatly increased global drought

Greatly diminished crop yeilds

Decimated ozone layer. Northern and Southern hemispheres

Contaminated soils

Contaminated waters

Contaminated atmosphere and breathable air column

Unquantifiable negative impacts to all life forms

Increased dry lightning strikes creating record forest fires

Possible triggering of climate feed back loops like methane hydrate and clathrate releases

If there was anything truly benevolent about the global spraying, why would there be so much effort to keep these programs hidden? Why would virtually every government agency aggressively deny their existence?

The military industrial complex is doing whatever it deems necessary to increase its power no matter what the cost to the planet or all life that exists here. Their past conduct makes this abundantly clear. The detonation of over 1800 nuclear bombs on planet earth should make this clear.We are not dealing with sanity in any sense of the word in regard to the runaway juggernaut that is the global power structure and its military industrial complex.

All things considered, global geoengineering is not a cure, but a curse so horrific that it quite literally puts life on Earth in the balance. It is up to all of us to bring this greatest untold issue to light and to a halt. Our lives, and our long term survival, literally depends on it.

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org

Related Article:  Government Documents link Global Warming to Advanced Military Climate Modification

Scientists Investigate Role of HAARP in Destructive Weather Patterns. 2

Destructive weather patterns and HAARP – Scientists investigate a possible connection

Wednesday, November 14, 2012 by: Carolanne Wright

 (NaturalNews) With the aftermath of hurricane Sandy still fresh in the minds of Americans, many are questioning the possible link between destructive weather patterns and the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska. Several researchers who study the science behind HAARP have come forward with concerns about the disruptions this technology causes in the ionosphere and the impact it has on earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis and other natural disasters. Some also consider HAARP to be a new breed of weapon.

HAARP 101

HAARP is located in Gakona, Alaska. It is a collection of antennas placed on a computer controlled grid referred to as a “phased array.” The Navy and Air Force manage the program. According to the official government website:

“HAARP is a scientific endeavor aimed at studying the properties and behavior of the ionosphere, with particular emphasis on being able to understand and use it to enhance communications and surveillance systems for both civilian and defense purposes.”

The antennas send out powerful radio waves that are focused onto the ionosphere (the delicate upper layer of the atmosphere), heating up those areas. “Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto the earth and penetrate everything — living and dead,” explains Dr. Nicholas Begich, an expert on HAARP. Not only does this technology have applications for communication systems and defense, but some believe it also has the capability to alter jet stream routes along with weather patterns. Many fear it could be used as a weapon of mass destruction as well.

Weather warfare

Worldwide concern about using the weather as a tool for warfare has created a public outcry, demanding transparency regarding HAARP technology. A Canadian CBC documentary about HAARP asserts:

“It isn’t just conspiracy theorists who are concerned about HAARP. The European Union called the project a global concern and passed a resolution calling for more information on its health and environmental risks. Despite those concerns, officials at HAARP insist the project is nothing more sinister than a radio science research facility.”

The European Union requested an investigation of HAARP to establish “its legal, ecological and ethical implications before any further research and testing.” The United States has repeatedly refused such an investigation on the grounds of ‘national security.’

Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, a professor at the University of Ottawa, Canada, believes that both the Americans and Russians have developed the capacity to manipulate climate with a new generation of “non-lethal weapons.”

More…

Big Oil Using Weather Modification to Melt Ice For Access to Huge Arctic Oil Reserves Reply

EXOPOLITICS with Host Alffred Webre – Aug 30, 2012:  Guest is  Lauren Moret, PhD who reports:

Big Oil at BP and Shell are beneficiaries of HAARP and Jet Aerosols involvement in melting ice in order to gain access to huge arctic oil reserves.

HAARP Involvement in Hurricane Isaac and New Orleans Flooding on 5th Anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.

Weather Modification/HAARP producing drought with Nation’s food supply in CA at peril due to water restrictions.

Moret declared on March 21, 2011 that the “Japan Earthquake” and “accidents” that occurred March 11, 2011, were deliberate acts of tectonic nuclear warfare. She claimed further that the “attack” was carried out using HAARP technology by the Central Intelligence Agency, the United States Department of Energy, and British Petroleum on behalf of London banking interests.

More…

Geoengineering: IPCC’s Plan To Spray Toxic Aerosols To “Fix” Climate Change. Reply

This 1999 IPCC Special Report – “Aviation and the Global Atmosphere” was presented as the most comprehensive assessment available of the effects of aviation on the global atmosphere.

The report promises to consider all the gases and particles emitted by aircraft into the atmosphere and the role they play in modifying the chemical properties of the atmosphere and initiating the formation of contrails.

But the publication betrays this promise on the book’s cover when emissions of persistent contrails (PC’s) are seen behind the engines as the jet travels across a clear blue sky.

Although persistent contrails are an occasional fact of aircraft flight in very humid conditions, NASA and Air Force contrail science makes it clear that conditions of high relative humidity – near water vapour saturation – are required to produce a PC.

A normal water vapour contrail under typical flight conditions of < 50% relative humidity will not produce a PC and will become visible no sooner than 1/2 plane length behind the tail section.

Emissions from these jets are visible significantly ahead of the tail section – a condition that violates the long-accepted definition of contrails produced by water vapour.

Instead it’s more reasonable that these aircraft are depicted flying in formation to deploy particulates and chemicals of geoengineering aerosols.  If so, the IPCC failed in their mission to consider the role of all the gases and particles emitted by aircraft  when they excluded the huge impact of tons of atmospheric particulates emitted from jet aircraft as geoengineering aerosols.

Notes:

“Aviation And The Global Atmosphere”

Contrail Science

Geoengineering and Climate Change Experiments Altering Natural Weather Patterns 1

Susanne Posel (Source)
Occupy Corporatism
September 7, 2012

According to a report published in Nature, biodiversity thrives in periods of warming; however alarmists do not want this fact to be misconstrued with the dangerous conditions man-made global warming is creating across the planet.

Bálint Miklós, researcher at the Biodiversity and Climate Research Center in Germany believes that there is an underestimation of biodiversity loss when it comes to purveyors of the man-made global warming myth. By using genetics to identify a species, Miklós asserts that climate change disrupts a species natural ebb and flow which is directly tied to global warming.

The myth of biodiversity suffering because of man-made climate change stems from a World Wildlife Fund (WWF) blog that claimed the polar bear population was suffering due to man-made climate change. The claim of the drowning polar bears goes back to a federal study that was obviously doctored. The 2006 paper from the journal Polar Biology lacked any supporting evidence for its claims that “drowning-related deaths of polar bears may increase in the future if the observed trend of regression of pack ice and/or longer open-water periods continues.”

More…

Secret US Climate Modification Program Offers Big Profits to Wall Street Insiders 2

Why In The World Are They Spraying?:  Released in early September, 2012this is the second documentary exposing a classified global geoengineering program where military and now, civilian jet aircraft release nano-sized heavy metals and other toxins into the upper atmosphere.

The populace term for this global spraying operation is “chemtrails” –  a term used in the 2001 language of House Resolution 2977 sponsored by Rep., Dennis Kucinich.

In 2001 Proposed legislation (HR 2977) created a buzz in the Air Traffic Control community.  Introduced by Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, this bill called for the peaceful uses of space, and a ban on ‘exotic weapons’ .
Section 7 of the ‘Space Preservation Act of 2001’ sought specifically to PROHIBIT “CHEMTRAILS”.  (Source)

More…

Secret Geoengineering With Jet Aerosols is Warming The Weather Reply

Beginning in the nid-90’s people all over the world began to notice a dramatic increase in jet aircraft emissions that sprayed strange persistent contrails in their skies.

Meanwhile, illnesses like obesity, Alzheimers, cancer, autism and MS have increased during the same period.

Forests, trees, plants and animals are under increasing stress from persistent drought and probable soil degradation when the aerosols settle to earth.

More…

1980 Stated Objective to Use Jet Contrails to Improve Weather Reply

Aired on 12/30/1980

“On clear days, you can often see long white lines being traced high in the sky. They are contrails of jet aircraft. They’re actually long, slender clouds. Other men are finding them especially fascinating because the theory is being developed that those long, white lines may be changing our weather for the better.

Basis of NBC report in this 1980 document:  State Water Survey Division, ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES SECTION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS –  EFFECT OF CONTRAIL CIRRUS ON SURFACE WEATHER CONDITIONS IN THE MIDWEST – PHASE I-Aug-1980
More…