Carnicom: High Levels of Aluminum and Biologicals In Same Rainwater Samples Reply

clifford carnicom Institute logo

Comments by Harold Saive

Three papers published by Cliff Carnicom in November, 2015 confirm previous rainwater testing performed by certified EPA labs over the past decade revealing high concentrations of aluminum in rainwater that greatly exceed the stated EPA limit for drinking water.

Importantly, Carnicom’s testing for biologicals within these rainwater samples is positive – a finding consistent with spraying of filaments long implicated in the dreaded Morgellons syndrome.

Mankind is now faced with the dual chemical and biological threat of an “exotic weapon” defined in HR-2977 as “chemtrails”.  The presence of heavy metals combined with The New Biology of engineered life forms released into Eerth’s atmosphere is a diabolical reality that many people will unfortunately reject as a conspiracy theory regardless the growing scientific evidence.

My personal recommendation is to filter drinking water with reverse osmosis or equivalent filters capable of removing heavy metals and fluoride.  The presence of fluoride on the nation’s water supply is likely to potentiate the heavy metals, biologicals and other toxins as an increasingly toxic brew.

Abstracts of Carnicom’s recent publications follow:

Preliminary Rainwater Analysis :
Aluminum Concentration

Clifford E Carnicom
Nov 02 2015


A method and means to identify the species and concentration of several different trace metals in ionic form has been established.  The method employed is that of differential cyclic chronopotentiometry, which is a subset of the science of voltammetry.  The brief paper presents a preliminary examination of a rainwater sample for the existence of trace metals.  The sample under examination shows the existence of aluminum in a soluble form.  An estimate of the concentration level of the aluminum has been made; this level exceeds that of the recommended standards for drinking water.  The results indicate that public concern about the toxicity levels of certain trace metals in the general environment are warranted, and that a more thorough evaluation of the state of atmospheric quality by the responsible agencies is required.



Secondary Rainwater Analysis :
Organics & Inorganics

Clifford E Carnicom
Nov 04 2015


A second rainwater sample has been evaluated. On this occasion, both organic and inorganic attributes of the sample have been examined.  Although the sample investigated is of much larger volume, the results demonstrate an essentially equivalent level of aluminum present to that defined within the earlier report, i.e., approximately 2 PPM.  This magnitude exceeds the US Environmental Protection Agency recommended standards for aluminum in drinking factor by roughly a factor of 10. 

In addition, various organic attributes of the sample are introduced within this report.

“There is now a necessity to include an additional aspect of the rainfall analysis that has made its presence known more clearly.  This is the case of biologicals.  It is a fact, that in addition to the repeated detection of a trace metal at questionable levels, certain organic constituents are coming to the fore.   The test results are repeatable at this point and these organics will eventually require an equal accounting for their existence.  I will not enter into an extended discussion of their potential significance at this time, as the first and necessary step is to place on the table that which must be confronted.  My introductory suggestion at this point is to become aware of a previous paper on this site, entitled “A New Biology” to gain some familiarity with the scope of the issue “.



Tertiary Rainwater Analysis : Questions of Toxicity

Clifford E Carnicom
Nov 08 2015


This paper presents evidence of a chemical signature that exists within an analyzed rain sample that is characteristic of known toxins and pesticides. The method of analysis used is that of mid-infrared spectroscopy. Specifically, certain functional groups involving sulfur, nitrogen, phosphorus, oxygen, and halogens have been identified in the analysis. It is recommended that the investigation be duplicated by independent researchers to determine if an environmental hazard does exist. If these results are verified to be positive, the source of the contaminants is to be identified and eliminated from the environment.


Pilots Plan Atmospheric Testing to Document Aerosol Geoengineering 1

Scientist along with pilots set out to test Chemtrails phenomenon, all while breaking a few world records in the process.
J Marvin Herndon PhDLOS ANGELES, Nov. 3, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — Potentially the most difficult environmental test in history is about to take place. World renowned scientist Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, along with two volunteer environmentalists from the National Crime Scene Cleanup Association (NCSCA), are setting out to find conclusive evidence about the existence of “chem trails”. Award Winning Director/Producer Michael J. Murphy will be documenting this incredible feat. (Continue)

Republic of Cyprus Takes Official Stance Against Climate Geoengineering Reply

“…the Minister of Agriculture, Farm Development and Environment assured the House of Represerntatives that the Republic of Cyprus does not support any interference with the atmosphere for the purpose of changing climatic conditions, through aerial spraying that might affect the environment and human health.” More…

RUSSIA TODAY: NATO Commander Tells Truth About “Chemical Trails” 3

Rumsfeld Military Chemtrails Tanker

General Fabio Mini, NAT CommanderGeneral Fabio Mini, NATO Commander:

“Concerning chemical trails, I’ll tell the truth.  I try to study this phnomenon in depth.  Now I’ll say something that could bother someone.  I used to think it was a swindel too but the pictures we can find online are really dreadful because the trails intersect regularly.”



Vatican connection to Chemical Trails and More – Click Here

Vatican Commemorative Coin Chemtrail 100 Lire


Climategate Still The Issue as Carbon Pope Lauds Corrupt Climate Science 3

Pope Climategate is still the issueThe Laudato Si’ (PDF):  It’s more than a disgrace that the Pope and Vatican would censor alternative perspectives from highly respected climate scientists to be included in encyclical’s “Laudato Si’.  Instead, only the most radical ideologs from the extreme corners of the climate debate were allowed to advide the Pope.  Reading the “Laudato Si” could give the uneducated a false impression that the Pope is a qualified climatologist speaking in the first person from his own career of research and published work.  (more)

CLIMATE of FAITH: Climate Depot Talking Points about Pope Francis’ Climate Encyclical (PDF)

Although the “Laudato” could be seen as adulterated with cherry-picked assertions on climate change, neither the speech to Congress or to the United Nations contained explicit reference to “climate change” or “global warming”.  Instead, both speeches more appropriately focused on man-made environmental damage, loss of species, damage to forests, destruction of war, nuclear weapons and reckless harvesting of natural resources as the dominant theme.  Pope’s Congressional Transcript (PDF) — UN Transcript (PDF)

The Climategate Inquiries:  A detailed assessment of the Climategate inquiries set up by the University of East Anglia and others which finds that they avoided key questions and failed to probe some of the most serious allegations. The Climategate Inquiries, written by Andrew Montford and with a foreword by Lord (Andrew) Turnbull, finds that the inquiries into the conduct and integrity of scientists at the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia were rushed and seriously inadequate. (Report – PDF)

The Myth of 97% Scientific Consensus:  The media propaganda alleging a 97% consensus that climate change is  man-made comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises now contradicted by more reliable research.  Andrew Montford (PDF)

In 2009, James Corbett reports “Climategate is still the issue”

In 2009, James Corbett Interviewed Climatologist, Tim Ball on the consequences of East Anglia climate science corruption.

Transcript and sources

BOOK - Tim Ball deliberate corruption of climate science-smallIn 2014, Dr. Tim Ball published a book: “The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science”, an astonishing work detailing the massive fraud where climate authors indulged in the incestuous practice of “peer reviewing” each others’ papers in order to make the best case for the IPCC’s repeatedly failed climate models.  

James Corbett easily debunks the myth that climate denial is a well-funded conspiracy when $Trillions in profit are revealed to be in the global industry of “climate change” – a term with no meaningful definition such that climate can be usefully distinguished from the more ordinary term, ” weather “.

“The global warming industry has generated over $140 billion in government grants, a $315 billion carbon market and is expected to generate 10s of trillions more in government-sponsored investment in the coming decades.”

Controlling the Weather Yields $BIllions in Profit for Rothschilds

In 2011 Evelyn De Rothschilds and wife purchased a 70% stake in Weather Central seeing strong growth prospects for selling it’s weather data to insurers, commodity traders, energy companies and emerging market broadcasters” (Source FT)

How the Media Reports Fake Weather as “Climate Change”


Suspicious observers header

Top 6 “Climate Change” Problems

Ben Davidson EU 2014 MugBen Davidson is a Solar and Space weather analyst at with more than 40,000 online subscribers. Ben’s regular 3 to 4 minute Youtube daily updates on solar, earthquake, geophysical and weather activity are widely regarded as unique, highly informative and professional. (Complete Bio)

In March, 2015, Davidson posted a video outlining what he regards as the top 6 problems with the flawed IPCC version of Climate Change.

Many of Ben’s observations look outside planet earth to explain how the sun, galactic forces and observed changes within our own solar system exert influences on the earth and other planets revolving around our sun.

Problem #6 focuses on the covert geoengineering operations that are “messing with the weather”.  Aerosol spraying is a global program known to exist but rarely acknowledged by IPCC investigators, corporate media, government agencies or elected officials.

Occasionally, a climate expert, not subscribed to the cult network of climate corruption will comment openly on the aerosol climate engineering operation. In the video below, Dr. Jasper Kirkby, presents the evidence for climate engineering to an audience at CERN:

Failure for IPCC workgroups to acknowledge this aerosol deployment is the smoking gun that these geoengineering eco-weapons combined with electromagnetic transmitters and ionospheric heaters, are creating the weather disruption being sold to the public as man-made climate change.

Suspicious 0bservers, Top 6 “Climate Change” Problems

Complete Source links to Video Comments (PDF)


The following video was captured by an astronomer to reveal the release of chemicals from several jet aircraft.  Although the evidence for chemical aerosol releases is confirmed beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no evidence that these aircraft were actually carrying passengers.


Vatican’s Curious Jet “Contrail Coin” Minted in 1985

Vatican Commemorative Coin Chemtrail 100 Lire

This Vatican’s “chemtrail coin” was minted in 1985 just as NASA began to indoctrinate school children into accepting chemtrails as normal clouds. A clip from Rosalind Peterson’s excellent 2010 discussion confirms the deliberate science fraud and mind-washing of school children is now in effect with forced vaccinations next on the NWO agenda. (More)

Geoengineering - The False Climate of Pope

MOVIE: “Snowpiercer” Predicts Ice Age Created by Jet Aircraft Contrails 3

The Deeper Meaning of Snowpiercer (2013)

By: Jay Dyer (Source)



Snowpiercer Movie posterSnowpiercer stands out as a recent example of a trend fans of film are witnessing more of: philosophically-focused science fiction and fantasy.  While it could be argued that many science fiction classics deal with some philosophical themes, the trend has become far more common than in previous decades.  In the last several years, films such as After the Dark, The Double, Enemy, Another Earth, as well as many others ask audiences to grapple with complex conundrums such as globalism, meaning and the self, morality and death, and even deeper esoteric questions, like alternate worlds and mystical symbology.  While Hollywood is busy with found-footage horror, cynical raunchy comedies and comic book blockbusters (the latter of which do incorporate conspiriana), lesser-known independent films are touching on far more abtruse matters that extend beyond the realm of the political.  Seeing new films clearly influenced by Terry Gilliam, for example, is a welcomed beacon of hope.  A rebellion in the arts towards asking meaningful questions that challenge social engineering and prepackaged think tank paradigms is precisely what is needed, and that is partly my intention with this site.

Based on the French graphic novel Le Transperceneige, Snowpiercer is Korean filmmaker Bong Joon-ho’s first English release.  The plot involves a post-apocalyptic world that has entered a new ice age due to mankind’s failed geoengineering and climate-altering hubris.  The amorphous chemical “CW7” is sprayed globally to halt a supposed “global warming” catastrophe, while the ice age actually occurs as a result of the chemical spraying, and not “climate change.”  To see a film present the very real threat of geoengineering and climate alteration through aerosol spraying, as well as questioning the “global warming” hoax (now morphed into “climate change” by public relations consultants) is startling to say the least.  While there may be some film that has previously questioned these establishment orthodoxies, I am not aware of it.  For unknowing skeptics and system hacks, I present two clear examples of the reality of aerosol chemical spraying (“chemtrails,” as opposed to normal ice crystal “con trails”) and geoengineering that are undeniable.

The first is The Guardian’s piece on Bill Gates’ support for geoengineering, under the very auspices Snowpiercer questions – global warming. The Guardian reports in its 2012 article, ‘Bill Gates Backs Climate Scientists Lobbying for Large-Scale Geoengineering’:

snowpiercer.-Movie Scene

“A small group of leading climate scientists, financially supported by billionaires including Bill Gates, are lobbying governments and international bodies to back experiments into manipulating the climate on a global scale to avoid catastrophic climate change.  The scientists, who advocate geoengineering methods such as spraying millions of tonnes of reflective particles of sulphur dioxide 30 miles above earth, argue that a “plan B” for climate change will be needed if the UN and politicians cannot agree to making the necessary cuts in greenhouse gases, and say the US government and others should pay for a major programme of international research.”

Skeptics are likely to claim this is only theoretical, inasmuch as the article reports on scientists merely calling for this, as opposed to it actually being accomplished.  Such naiveté is common on these matters, as so-called skeptics perpetually display their own ignorance of establishment tendencies.  Like the taunting of psychopathic criminals, whatever is “called for” in the news is generally what’s actually been practiced for a long while, and aerosol geoengineering and atmospheric manipulation is no exception.  The technology is decades old, and began as weather warfare during World War II, where seasonal changes and storms could be harnessed to harm enemy resources through controlled droughts, floods, etc.  Earthquake weaponry also falls into this category, as well as biological waarfare, EMPs and HAARP, all falling under the broad umbrella of the concept of weaponized nature.  However, for hardened skeptics, I refer to the even stronger example of the Stanford VLF Group, which openly publishes dozens of scientific papers on HAARP, atmospheric aerosol spraying, geoengineering, frequency manipulation, and other advanced research projects.

Snowpiercer begins with planes spraying the sky, while news casts report the importance of CW7 as the last hope to save humanity.  As a result, virtually all life on earth perishes, while a small number of “chosen” are whisked away aboard a high-speed perpetual motion-run train that circles the globe.  A perpetual motion machine is, in fact, a holy grail of technology, as its desire grew from the mechanistic model of the universe that gained sway in the Enlightenment.  From the Enlightenment came the reign of quantity and rationalization of all reality into the collapsed, reductionist grand narrative of evolutionary materialism.  Within this paradigm, man is viewed as a cog in the deterministic, naturalistic machine of the inanimate, eternal and universal ecosystem.  In this view, the symbiotic ecosystem requires an inchoate metaphysical principle of “balance,” and thus the Malthusian presuppositions of eugenics come into play, removing man from his previous position of ordained steward of creation under God, to an impersonal artifact on a social Darwinian ladder, who must ever grapple to become the fittest.  The “fittest” then rapaciously destroy one another to subjugate and dominate nature en toto, in order to transcend it.  The culmination of this worldview is, of course, transhumanism, and Snowpiercer will become, as I argue, a warning for this worldview.

Protagonist Curtis (Chris Evans) plays the revolutionary leader of the “back” of the train, who, under the tutelage of the aging former leader Gilliam (John Hurt), must organize the final rebellion against the tyrannical “front” of the train.  Class warfare clearly comes to the fore, as the front of the train are all presented as decadent elite, wining and dining on the finest delicacies, enjoying every possible luxury a train can afford, while the workers at the back are forced by a brutal police state to produce for the parasitical front.  Minister Mason (Tilda Swinton) heads up the front class’ security forces in a role reminiscent of something akin to Mao Tse Tung’s wife, Jiang Qing.  Her communist dictator persona may seem out-of-place, given the monopolistic capitalism of the train’s inventor, Mr. Wilford (Ed Harris), yet regular readers will be familiar with the longtime argumentation presented here that communism and monopoly capitalism are flip sides of the same dialectical coin.  The corporate fascism of Wilford works hand in hand with the dictatorial militaristic police state polices of Minister Mason.  It is also not accidental that her name is Mason, given the history of world freemasonry exhibits a clear proclivity for communism, from Robespierre and Marat to Salvador Allende.  Communism and fascism are both political technologies designed to suit the same totalitarian ends.

As the Curtis Revolution progresses, car by car, each compartment gives a new revelation of the dark nature of the system.

The train’s unbending regimented eugenics policies and schoolhouse indoctrination programs emerge are the most significant, as viewers witness a classroom propaganda video portraying Mr. Wilford as a literal god and savior.  Here the film’s symbolism used to describe the train exemplifies an important deeper message.  The train is compared symbolically three ways in the narrative: to a machine, to the world, and to a human body.  Early on, as an angry worker loses his arm as a punishment, Minister Mason curiously describes the train as a body with a “head” and a “foot.”  “Everything must stay in its preordained place,” she exclaims, as the foot trying to become the head leads to chaos, and chaos means the dissolution of mankind and loss of the train’s balanced ecosystem.  As the insurrection seizes the car associated with water production, a captive Minister Mason informs Curtis that water comes “from the mouth of the train, not the bum,” and that a resource war will harm all the train’s inhabitants.  When Curtis reaches the front of the train, Wilford gives the descriptive imagery of the train as “an eternal machine” and as “the world,” but its significance will be detailed below.

While the revolution progresses, Curtis gradually begins to make tough moral choices that reveal more about his pragmatic designs to the viewer, as well as to himself.  Curtis is forced to sacrifice his friend’s life to apprehend Minister Mason, then shoot Mason in the head, as well as admitting to cannibalism in the past to survive.  Curtis slowly grasps that his own nature is quite cruel, calculating and vicious, and the difficulty of holding everyone to his egalitarian and equalitarian moral standards becomes more challenging.  By the time Curtis reaches the front car and the engine, Wilford divulges the entire regime change was staged and engineered.  Gilliam, the old revolutionary leader, is actually Wilford’s old friend, with a special direct phone line that communicates front to back.  Gilliam and the revolution are then sacrificed by Wilford to maintain the 74% eco-balance for “sustainability.”

Wilford’s monologue then paints the train as the world, revealing to Curtis that all along the plan was to offer him leadership of the train, replacing Wilford.  Since Curtis was the first worker to make a successful coup and reach the front, he was in a unique position to have seen the entire “machine” and its full hierarchical order, as no one else had.  Wilford explains that the train must be ruled by “anxiety, fear and horror” in a balance to psychologically manipulate and control the masses.  Meanwhile, the Curtis Revolution explodes into full anarchy and Wilford whispers to Curtis that without a hero, the train won’t run.  “The eternal engine. It is eternity itself,” Wilford sneers, waiting for Curtis to accept the implications of his failed mutiny.  The crucial point in all this is the principle of managed dialectics – iconized in the communist revolutionary as a controlled creation of the engineers of the system (Wilford), whose aspirations are already calculated to serve first class when anxiety, subversion, chaos or depopulation were needed. The phony left-right paradigm of Hegelian duality could not be better demonstrated. The train is a mini one world government built upon the industrial ingenuity of mass travel and global commerce, foreshadowing our own bleak dialectical future of a planetary regime.

Approaching the climax, Wilford hands Curtis a final secret message that reads “blood,” having previously sent “water,” which are basic elements of life and energy.  They are also crucial components of the human body and its machinery, so we can make a connection here between the heart and the engine.  Curtis also discovers the ominous reality that the engine runs on the work of child slave labor, while Wilford sneers that the tail section supplies a steady stream of kids.  The parasitical tyranny that is the train proves too much for Curtis, who opts to sabotage and derail it with the aid of the prophetic drug addict Nam and his daughter, Yona.  However, Nam and Yona have discovered the great secret – the ice and snow are gradually melting, meaning there is the possibility of life outside the train.  The real ecosystem is restoring its own balance, and man can be reconciled to it.  As the train derails,. Nam and Curtis sacrifice themselves to shield Yona and a child from the explosion, and as a result, they become the last two survivors of humanity.  Upon exiting the train, Yona spots a polar bear, meaning the existence of the train as the sole means for life and survival to be a farce.  Whether intentional or not, we aren’t told, the myth of the impossibility of life outside the train was a farce.  Although CW7 had brought an ice age, the principle of life triumphs over man’s technological dominance and alienation.  The great irony is that in Wilford’s doctrine of “everything in its place,” everything was out-of-place.  Wilford had succumbed to the same irrational hubris that blinded pre-apocalypse humanity before the ice age.

On an esoteric level, there are elements of gnosticism throughout (and communism shares gnostic origins): Curtis is a kind of new man, destined to be the philosopher king Wilford desired.  Wilford’s revelation of the need for the “noble lie” of divine rulership to quell the masses echoes Plato’s Republic, which also curiously utilizes the symbology known as the “anthropic principle”.  The anthropic principle is the notion that observations about the physical universe bear some fundamental correlation and connection to human consciousness as its observer.  In esoteric tradition, the anthropic principle extends as far as the idea that the human body itself is the microcosmic (microprosopus) mirror to the macrocosmic (macroprosopus) universe as a whole.  Thus, in Plato’s Republic, the ideal republic is compared the body of man, while in his creation account, the Timaeus, this tradition replicates on the cosmic scale, comparing the universe to the body of a man.  Curtis’ journey from the tail to the front may also symbolize the ascent of the soul in many traditions, particularly traditions that describe the soul after death passing through several gates or planetary “toll houses” to reach God, heaven or some blissful afterlife.  Having forgotten his former life before the train, Curtis’ journey also echoes the Platonic doctrine of the soul’s migration from embodied particularity back to the One, from which all being flows.  Curtis can be viewed on this level as the enlightened philosophic or religious soul seeking to escape the illusory reality the platonic demiurge has imposed upon the senses through the veil of materiality and flux.

In a world where man has acquiesced to allow his technological lust to outweigh his wisdom, the dangers of bare gnosis without wisdom become apparent.  Snowpiercer asks us to ponder this profound question, and consider scientism’s past mistakes and blunders that have not led to human apotheosis, but mass death and self-destruction.  Is large-scale geoengineering, tampering with the ecosystem under phony Malthusian sustainability and eugenically-regimented population control not itself the cause for much of the misery, chaos and alienation man experiences in his modern technocratic, quantification-obsessed existence?  Snowpiercer answers in the affirmative, and the film displays this wise message in a skillful and sophisticated form that makes it stand out in its craft.  Can we exit crazytrain before crazytrain suffers a train wreck?