HAARP? 6 Stunning Earthquake Predictions Including Fukushima 4

Suspicious observers header

Does Ben Davidson’s method for predicting earthquakes remove HAARP and Climate Engineering Weapons from suspicion?

How does the collapsing magnetosphere affect Climate Events

Complete Story at MAGNETICREVERSAL.org

Summary:  Magnetosphere began most rapid decline after year 2,000.   Earth magnetic poles are rapidly moving and getting ready to reverse or “flip”.   This could lead to extinction level event and biblical floods. (More)

Satellite Image over Japan reveals electromagnetic influence and aerosol climate engineering during period of Fukushima Earthquake on 11/21/2016.

japan-7-4-earthquake-11-22-2016

North Magnetic Pole Shift From 1900 to 2020

north-pole-shift-visual-map

Elevated Radiation Readings Found in Forida Air Conditioning Filter 9

Why-Obama-Won’t-Admit-Fukushima-Radiation-is-Poisoning-Americans…Connecting-the-DotsElevated Radiation Readings in Gainesville, Fl

On September 24, a test was performed to measure surface radiation contamination accumulated on the surface of an air conditioning filter that had been in service for 90 days.

The filter tested was an Aprilaire Model 2200 and all measurements were determined using  an Inspector Alert Surface radiation contamination monitor, Model AI-V2.

The first 10 minute test was performed on a brand new filter to determine the particle decay rate (CPM) on a surface not contaminated by prior service as an air conditioning filter.

A second 10 minute test was performed on a filter surface following 90 days of normal operation from mid-June through Mid-September, 2015 .

The new filter measured a 10 minute rate of 308 counts or 31 counts per minute while the used filter reported a 10 minute rate of 714 counts or 71 counts per minute – more than twice the decay rate of the new, uncontaminated filter.

Although 71 CPM is under the radiation warning rate of 100 CPM the test reveals hidden radioactive contamination can be insideously introduced into the breathable household atmosphere.

Modern Survival Blog

__________________

California Detects Radiation in Rainwater

EnvironmentalReporter.com

As reported in the article, “High Radiation Detected in L.A. Rain” hot rain was detacted in the western Los Angeles basin multiple times with the highest registering 3.3 times background levels. The California Highway Patrol considers any substance radiating more than three times background hot enough to trip its Hazardous Materials protocols. Those emergency measures include suiting up personnel in impermeable outfits with ventilators.

Those precautions were not evident in the greater Los Angeles as the storm drenched thousands of people caught unawares of the impending storm. High levels of beta radiation in rain are especially of concern when children and pregnant women are exposed to the hot water which can cause blood cancers, including leukemia, and a host of ailments introduced courtesy of the Atomic Age.

Fukushima Radiation Up 50,000% With Elevated Radiation Reported Across North America 3

Obama Hush on Fukushima

(NaturalNews) Beta radiation levels are off the charts at monitoring sites all across North America, according to new reports. But experts are blaming these radiation spikes on practically everything except for Fukushima.

Data gathered from tracking units in California, Arizona, Illinois and elsewhere reveal radiation levels up to 50,000 percent higher than what was observed at the same time last year, and in some cases compared to levels seen this past summer.

EnviroReporter.com says the impacted Global Fukushima Radiation warningsites are scattered throughout the country and aren’t just confined to the West Coast. Readings taken near Los Angeles; Chicago; Montgomery, Alabama; and Madison, Wisconsin, reveal total beta counts per minute (CPM) greatly exceeding the 1,000 CPM threshold considered by the government to be problematic.

In Tucson, Arizona, for instance, a 460 CPM reading was recently taken, which is more than 10 times higher than the reading taken last year on November 27. Similarly, Phoenix, Arizona’s 735 CPM reading measured more than 21 times higher than last year’s reading.

San Diego appears to be one of the hardest-hit areas, with a CPM reading of 650, as of October 1. This figure is 60 times higher than it was last year on the same date, despite the fact that San Diego’s normal background radiation rate typically hovers around 20 CPM.

“U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RadNet radiation monitors have detected renewed surges in atmospheric readings of dangerous beta radiation across the country,” explains EnviroReporter.com about the seemingly inexplicable phenomenon.

“Over a dozen metropolitan test sites have registered four-month highs in EnviroReporter.com’s most recent comprehensive assessment.”

Radiation testing site near Chicago records radiation levels thousands of times higher than maximum safety threshold

*** Continue ***

Florida Hit With Highest Level of Fukushima Radioactive Fallout Anywhere on Earth 1

Fukushima to Florida Radiation Fallout-a

Published: September 26th, 2014
By ENENews

Newly released data shows Florida hit with highest level of radioactive material from Fukushima measured anywhere in world outside Japan — #1 out of more than 1,500 test results — Total radioactive iodine was up to 500% of amount reported.

Analysis of data from sensitive U.S. monitoring stations for the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactor accident, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity: [A] major nuclear event at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station… resulted in a breach of the nuclear fuel integrity and release of radioactive fission products to the environment. Fission products started to arrive in the United States via atmospheric transport on March 15, 2011… Atmospheric activity concentrations of 131I reached levels of 3 x 10^-2 Bq/m³ [30,592 microBq/m³] in Melbourne, FL.  *** Continue

h

Is Fukushima Radiation Causing Critical Aircraft Parts to Fail? Reply

 

climate viewer News header

The Glowing Reality of Fukushima & Aviation – Pt 1.

Nuked Radio Special with Leuren Moret & Laurens Battis
Program recorded Sept 14th, 2014

Is Fukushima Radiation causing problems with aviation and infrastructure?

In February of 2014, we discussed ‘flying through fallout’ and the effect it has had on the health of pilots, flight crews, and frequent fliers since the Fukushima accident in Airline Anomalies Post-Fukushima. Following that interview, and in conversations with both pilots and nuclear engineers who reviewed our material, it became increasingly apparent that an even greater concern may be the compromised integrity of aircraft that have been flying through radioactive fallout for the past three-and-a-half years.

So we embarked on a new journey, which involved charting the numerous aircraft emergencies and crashes post-Fukushima. We uncovered extraordinary scientific studies from weapons testing, nuclear labs, aerospace, previous nuclear accidents such as Sellafield and Chernobyl, and from the IAEA on accelerated metal fatigue and material science studies done in radioactive environments.

We found similar data in regards to glass, electrical components, and computer systems. Discussions about how to approach this subject and its numerous complexities across multiple fields of science posed a unique set of challenges, and needed to be laid out carefully pre-interview so that people could easily digest this important information, regardless of their field of study. And, most importantly, keeping up with the ever-growing list of plane emergencies and crashes, and approaching each instance with a critical eye.  *** Continue

The Glowing Reality of Fukushima and Aviation – Pt 1 1

The Glowing Reality of Fukushima and Aviation – Pt 1
Christina Consolo  9/30/2014

Obama Hush on Fukushima

Is Fukushima Radiation causing problems with aviation and infrastructure?

In February of 2014, we discussed ‘flying through fallout’ and the effect it has had on the health of pilots, flight crews, and frequent fliers since the Fukushima accident in Airline Anomalies Post-Fukushima. Following that interview, and in conversations with both pilots and nuclear engineers who reviewed our material, it became increasingly apparent that an even greater concern may be the compromised integrity of aircraft that have been flying through radioactive fallout for the past three-and-a-half years.

So we embarked on a new journey, which involved charting the numerous aircraft emergencies and crashes post-Fukushima. We uncovered extraordinary scientific studies from weapons testing, nuclear labs, aerospace, previous nuclear accidents such as Sellafield and Chernobyl, and from the IAEA on accelerated metal fatigue and material science studies done in radioactive environments.

We found similar data in regards to glass, electrical components, and computer systems. Discussions about how to approach this subject and its numerous complexities across multiple fields of science posed a unique set of challenges, and needed to be laid out carefully pre-interview so that people could easily digest this important information, regardless of their field of study. And, most importantly, keeping up with the ever-growing list of plane emergencies and crashes, and approaching each instance with a critical eye.  ***Continue

Breaking News From Fukushima Radiation Leak Remains a Secret 5

Interview by Greg Hunter – 8/26/2014

James Corbett in Japan – Fukushima Update VIDEO –  (Start Time 15:20)

With disgraceful and irresponsible failure of federal agencies to monitor the impact of the Fukushima ecological disaster, independant sites have come online to present what data they can access.

  • FUKUSHIMAUPDATE.COM   James Corbett lives in Western Japan and provides no-nonsense info
  • FUKUSHIMAINFORM Excellent site for data presentation under scientific supervision.

James Corbett of The CorbettReport.com says it looks like we are headed towards global war.

Corbett says, “It is only a matter of what shape and what form that war will take place. We are seeing the battle lines being drawn. . . . I think this is very much going to be an economic conflict, or at least one that is fundamentally centered on economics. . . . They are constructing an alternative system, and we are truly moving out of the unipolar world, U.S. hegemony towards a multipolar world. There is no doubt that is taking place right now, and there is no doubt that can’t happen without some conflict happening. That conflict is on the way.”

On the ongoing enormous problems with the nuclear meltdown for Fukushima, Corbett who lives in western Japan, says, “There are three to four hundred tons of radioactive water spilling out every day from the Fukushima plant. Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with journalist James Corbett.

Complete interview including exposing the Federal Reserve

 

James Corbett Documentary
Century of Enslavement: The History of The Federal Reserve

IPCC Lost Credibility on Global Warming, Necessarily Renamed “Climate Change” Reply

Listen Closely to Media Fear Porn Propaganda That Blames Fukushima Disaster on “Climate Change”

IPCC History Lesson

February 17, 2014 (Original upload by Suspicious 0bservers)

The impetus to create this page was the assertion that Maurice Strong wrote the terms of reference for the IPCC Climate Assessments to cover only man-made causes of climate change. Terms of Reference are the de-facto “thou shalt only speak of these things” in this realm of study. While Mr. Strong is currently living in China-unresponsive to all attempts for contact- and while his signature is found on no official documents for that reference that I can find on the internet, I can say this… “U.N., we have a problem.”

IPCC WG1 Full Report – 1st Assessment +400 pages: Selected Screenshots and explanations for inclusion.
Click the Images for a Larger Version

Title 1 title 2

The Initial Charge to the IPCC:
1st IPCC WG1 Human Only
This is the first indication of how the IPCC views Climate Change. Although we do not yet see an expressly biased position, we see where the focus of causation could be found.

The Activities of Working Group 1:
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.15.12 AM
Working Group 1. The IPCC was divided into three working groups, each group was to build on the work of the previous group ONLY. This is not a wholly improper scientific technique, as it helps define the scope of the work. However, here we see the scope defined in the early 90s (actually much earlier) as being only that which might arise as a result of man’s activities. Working Group 1 built on those. Does this mean that WG2 and WG3 can only consider the work of WG1 on the result of human activities? Yes.

Oops.
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.19.19 AM
Nothing dishonest here… their models said one thing, that with the increasing CO2 we would see warming SURFACE TEMPERATURES. We know that CO2 is skyrocketing, and that the IPCC recently (2013) said there has been no global warming since the first report – but that the warming was occurring deep in the oceans. Honest mistake :)

Mister Twister calling the Past
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.20.37 AM
“Paleo-climate data is potentially useful but it’s not. It has too many variables but may yet be useful.” Is this a serious segment of a scientific report? Essentially, the historical CO2/Temperature data-match is one of their proofs for the current CO2 story, but where that correlation is now broken and we appear to be on the precipice of another temperature drop (keep reading) the historical context is clearly not a factor… right?

Discussing THEIR POTENTIAL ERRORS (A sign of good science; 1 point awarded to Slytherin)
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.23.58 AM
This is what we have come to learn more and more, including a few days ago in our morning news via NASA, Johns Hopkins and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem …maybe not such a drastic forcing effect after all?

So much for good science.
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.25.32 AM
As the highlighted portion suggests, it is obvious to the IPCC that our emissions are the primary factor. This cuts against their recognition of cooling mechanisms from the previous screen-shot, and indeed the words directly above the highlighted portion itself. They are NOT certain; they list their uncertainties but then claim that certain things are obvious. As it turns out, we now know our emission levels since then, the effect on atmospheric concentrations, and their LACK of an ability to warm the SURFACE TEMPERATURES as they so obviously predicted.

The can’t decide how uncertain they are…
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.27.35 AM
…but they can definitely say that they considered their current ocean-warming explanation way back then. Another point for the IPCC.

They should choose a different word.
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.28.52 AM
Significant. adjective – to the extent where it materially alters the outcome of a given scenario. I’ll use it in a sentence: No conclusion is worth reading if it has ‘significant’ errors.

We’re starting to get serious.
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 10.31.31 AM
So what exactly is Working Group 1 supposed to cover? They characterize these as “scenario” evaluations, and the scenarios are restricted to greenhouse gas emissions. Imagine the Reverse: It would be unwise to leave out all scenarios involving greenhouse gases, right? …just as absurdly, the “STEERING GROUP” veered WG1 away from anything natural, such that the scope of climate change would be so-defined.

Just Read.
Gangbusters
Plain and simple, from the start, CLIMATE CHANGE did not include naturally-forced variability.

Kind-of a cheap shot.
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 11.00.49 AM
“Oh look how cold we would be!” You mean if we took away a huge part of our atmosphere we’d be colder? You don’t say. In the box– I’m pretty sure there are a gargantuan amount of radiators from the earth that are not the direct result of greenhouse gases… oh crap, I forgot, that’s not allowed to be part of this analysis. My bad.

Look how close they were…
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 11.01.31 AM
Greenhouse gases are #2, the Sun is #1 – they knew it all along.

Don’t Lose Perspective
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 11.13.39 AM
One of the primary messages of our C(lie)mate video series is that the health affects of pollution, including those to the flora and fauna of earth, is a paramount concern, but one that cannot be used to cloud the meteorological analysis of our planet, and especially not in perspective with the changes in the rest of the solar system. Fact is, pollution is not a good thing for a large number of reasons. Even where no emissions are present, this author strongly opposes things like deforestation- for more reasons than I care to mention here. Got a little bit of hippy in me, so what?

Remember that paleo-data which may or may not be useful? They say THIS part is useful-
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 11.02.02 AM
Let’s go ahead and take their word for it…

…Look familiar?
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 11.38.20 AMScreen Shot 2014-02-17 at 12.00.12 PM
On the left side you see the image given in the original IPCC report with the latest data on the left and going into the past as the chart goes to the right; on the right side you see a bit more data-directly from the best available ice core data, and current day is at the right with the past shown to the left. Keeping this mirror-effect in mind, you should recognize the same source of the two charts. Look at the IPCC’s version, where it claims to show the current levels as of 1990… compare to the right side, where even that is outdated as we’ve broken the 400ppm mark in the atmosphere in the last 24 months. The IPCC chart is a lie; it does not show the most current data they had available, as 1990 levels of CO2 were well above the high 200s, and had already stopped being so-perfectly correlated to global surface temperatures once the industrial revolution began.

“Searching for a handle on the moment?” Feel like you have seen a lot but don’t know where to go from here? Curious about the implications, the natural variability, and what’s coming? Click Here.

The scientists at the IPCC aren’t necessarily doing anything wrong – although it is quite clear that at least some members of the steering committee and the scope-definition parameters for the initial project had just one agenda in mind. The scientists, for the most part, are performing a scientific process under the scope of those who are ‘above them.’ Consider that the evidence has been pushing us towards a more detailed look at solar forcing and the cooling mechanisms of certain emissions, then see the NEW definition of Climate Change in the latest IPCC Assessment (5th):
Screen Shot 2014-02-17 at 1.11.21 PM
Well now… that’s quite the shift now isn’t it? Great revelations in understanding do not happen overnight… and apparently only to small extents even over a couple decades. Baby steps…

The pattern is clear; the warming has stopped. The sun was strongest during the periods identified for global warming, and while scientists have identified the pacific ocean cycle as the current cause for a lack of surface warming, it matches the solar weakening we’ve now seen for years (better described in the C(lie)mate series). Despite the shift in evidence and discourse, the IPCC’s conclusions mysteriously get “more certain.”

Dear IPCC-

You brought all your skills, you brought all your data, you brought all your friends…

Online Book Tells All About Fukushima, Plume-Gate and Deadly Radiation Cover-up Reply

HATRICK PENRY UNBOUND

Hatrick Penrey, 2/9/2014

Plume Gate Book Cover Hatrick PenreyHistorically speaking, Plume-Gate is the world’s largest, provable, cover-up and conspiracy. If the Guinness Book of World Records considered ‘cover-up and conspiracy’ as a legitimate category, then certainly Plume-Gate would be at the very top of the list…above 9/11, above Watergate, above Fast and Furious, above even the JFK assassination, and not just for the sheer size and scope of the conspiracy, not because of the many alphabet agencies involved, not because President Obama is implicated, not because it reveals the truth about nuclear power and everything that goes with it, but because Plume-Gate is PROVABLE. And that proof is available to the public in the form of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Freedom of Information documents. The simple fact is: all one needs is the desire to know and the ability to read to familiarize oneself with this grandiose cover-up.

One Day Before Fukushima: NRC and Japanese “Utility Execs” participate in “incident response”

Don’t miss the stunning evidence of Fukushima foreknowledge published the day before the Tsunami. (Video Clip)  CLICK HERE

Examples of False Flag Events Preceded by Officially Noticed Exersizes

Complete Book in PDF Format (Large File)

Map of Fukushima Fallout in USA

*** Continue

Psychologists Conclude Conspiracy Theorists More Sane Than Sheeple 5

Conspiracy Theorist,  Dan Rather Comments on Controlled Demolition of WTC Building 7

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK).

Entitled “What about Building 7?  A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites. *** Continue

Government Not Reporting Fukushima Radiation So Public Should Be Alarmed Reply

Why-Obama-Won’t-Admit-Fukushima-Radiation-is-Poisoning-Americans…Connecting-the-Dots

Fukushima Radiation Hitting West Coast of North America:

“No One Is Measuring So Therefore We Should Be Alarmed”

Federal, State and Local Governments Refuse to Test for Radiation on the West Coast of North America

By Washington’s Blog
Global Research, January 27, 2014

Numerous models show that – while the ocean dilutes radiation – pockets and streams of concentrated radiation may still hit the West Coast of North America.

West Coast residents are very concerned.  Indeed, many local and state government officials have said that residents are inundating them with questions about Fukushima radiation.

And yet the government isn’t measuring seawater or fish on the West Coast for radiation.

Ken Buessler is the head scientist at Woods Hole in Massachusetts,  one of the world’s top ocean science institutions.  Much of Buessler’s career has focused on measuring radioactive particles in the ocean, and he’s been studying groundwater and ocean samples in and around Fukushima since the accident in March of 2011.   *** Continue

Economic Collapse Possible If Public Knew Truth About Fukushima Radiation 4

Why-Obama-Won’t-Admit-Fukushima-Radiation-is-Poisoning-Americans…Connecting-the-Dots

“If you like your ignorance of Fukushima radiation poisoning, you can keep your ignorance”

Why Obama Won’t Admit Fukushima Radiation is Poisoning Americans…Connecting the Dots

Chris Carrington
The Daily Sheeple
January 17th, 2014

We all know that the radiation from the stricken Fukushima plant has spread around the globe and is poisoning people worldwide. We all know that the West Coast of the United States is being polluted with radioactive debris and that the oceans, the beaches that border them, and even the air is becoming more polluted by radioactivity as time goes on.

You have to ask yourself why the government won’t admit this. It’s not like a disaster half a world away is their fault is it?

Or is it? Could the United States government have done something to prevent the situation getting to this point?

Nothing in this article is a state secret, everything is in the public domain, but the information is so disseminated that it appears disconnected.

I suggest that the United States government know only too well that the West Coast is polluted with radiation and that the situation is getting worse by the day.

I suggest that the United States government and General Electric knew that Fukushima was a disaster waiting to happen, and they did nothing to prevent it.

I suggest that they know that the many of nuclear reactors in the United States are also prone to catastrophic meltdown, and they are doing nothing about it.

I suggest that research by doctors and scientists is being suppressed, and that research by private citizens is being written off purely because they have no scientific background.

All the warnings were ignored. *** Continue

Scientists Release Report on Fukushima Radiation in Pacific Ocean 3

Nature News Header

International marine science organization releases report on radiation in Pacific Ocean

“Fukushima is indeed reaching the shores of Canada and the United States – and was detected at least six months ago.”

Monday, January 20, 2014 by: Thomas Henry

(NaturalNews) If you’ve heard about Fukushima radiation spreading to the Pacific Coast of North America but were “corrected” by sources both official and expert that this was based more on rumor than reality, then consider the information presented at the October 2013 North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES) annual meeting.

Researchers from Fisheries and Oceans Canada confirmed that the radioactive plume from Fukushima is indeed reaching the shores of Canada and the United States – and was detected at least six months ago – carried both in the ocean surface water and the atmosphere on similar but slightly different courses.

In a presentation titled “Communicating the forecasts, uncertainty and consequences of ecosystem change,” the Canadian researchers gave evidence that the bulk of radioactivity from Fukushima is shifting almost entirely from the western portion of the North Pacific (Japan) to the eastern portion (North America) over the course of the next five years. As of 2012, it had already reached the central region of the Pacific Ocean, and a previously unpublished map shows that, as of 2013, it had reached the shores of Alaska and British Columbia, with the most intense area of the plume yet to arrive. *** continue