Rockefeller Globalist Agenda-21 Behind Biomass and Plum Creek? Reply

Biomass Plant Approved

Hanrahan Endorses 3 Billion PPA contract

Hanrhan hand-picked Craig Lowe Scandal

______________________

Plum Creek and The Rockefeller Group to Pursue Development of 4,722 Acres in the Southeastern U.S.

Rockefeller-brothers-photo-with CaptionSEATTLE–(BUSINESS WIRE)— Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (NYSE: PCL  ) , and The Rockefeller Group, the global real estate investment and development company, today announced a memorandum of understanding to evaluate and pursue joint venture development projects on 4,722 acres of land in the southeastern United States owned by Plum Creek.

The initial agreement covers two large tracts of land, including approximately 2,600 acres in Columbia County, Fla., near the municipality of Lake City, as well as approximately 2,122 acres in Laurens County, Ga., near the municipality of Dublin. The companies have also agreed to review other land parcels owned by Plum Creek for consideration of future development opportunities. (Continue)

______________________

David Rockefeller book Memoirs“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” –  David Rockefeller “Memoirs”

______________________

Agenda 21: The Rockefellers Are Building Human Settlement Zones In Connecticut

 According to many “experts”, such as the World Health Organization, and the United Nations, 70% of the world’s population will be living in cities, by 2050.  Usually left out of the reporting of this statistic, are the determining factors that will be causing people to move off of rural land, and into the crowded cities.  What would make so many people leave their quiet, rural community, to go and live in a city, that is becoming evermore crowded, or what would stop someone that is living in a crowded city, from moving to a more quiet, rural community?  Surely more than 30% of the people in the world will want to have their own piece of land, with a house, away from the city, in 2050.
.

What these organizations are not telling you is that a massive shift of the population into cities is not a random projection, but a planned goal of many of the world’s top “leaders”, and leading organizations.  By causing an increase in the cost of owning, and living on, property in rural areas (property tax, car tax, utilities, etc.), governments will cause a shift of population from rural communities to the city.  This is one of the goals of United Nations Agenda 21.  Agenda 21 is a massive plan, or program of action, for the 21st century, developed by the United Nations, and connected organizations, that would require every resource in the world, including humans, to be collectivized, and controlled.  If you have never heard of, or are looking to become more familiar with, UN Agenda 21, I have read, and analyzed, the document, and have written a report titled, A Critical Analysis of Agenda 21 – United Nations Program of Action, which I highly recommend.  (More)

______________________

Rockefeller Brothers Fund Buying Off Evangelicals, Mayors, and Governors for the “Green Agenda”

“(…) foundation dollars extended to support these non-green voices have grown dramatically (…). The RBF has supported “allied voices for climate action” that include businesses, investors, evangelicals, farmers, sportsmen, labor, military leaders, national security hawks, veterans, youth, and governors and mayors. (more)

______________________

Rockefellers Invest in Fracking as they pretend to divest from Petroleum. (article)

Reducing their investment in petrol, Standard Oil has focused on hydraulic fracturing (fracking) as is sanctioned by the UN as the alleged eco-friendly replacement for petrol across the globe.

Devil in the Details:

♦  Hydraulic “fracking”  is a mining process invented by Standard Oil (Rockefellers) in 1947 to extract Oil and Natural Gas.

♦  Natural Gas (Ngas) is the corporate name for Methane (CH4) a powerful greenhouse gas far more potent than CO2.  Corporate media rarely reports that Ngas is essentially no different than methane.  Instead, the stock market refers to Ngas as a relatively clean energy commodity to be lauded by global warming activists.  But the same uninformed activists who fall for Ngas propaganda will wave signs to protest releases of methane into the atmosphere by cows.  Even activists who protest the environmental assault of fracking are mostly unaware that methane is being mined for re-sale as “Natural Gas”.   EPA Statement  (More) .

Fracking Protesters

________________________

An aggressive program of annexation has served to capture rural areas into Ganesville’s urban tax base while Alachua County governtment is moving to increase the cost for those who choose to live in unincorporated areas.

________________________

Secret Weather Modification Programs Exposed As Cause of “Climate Change” 1

WEATHER MODIFICATION Programs, Problems, Policy and Potential-b

The most important finding in this report is that climate engineering was covertly deployed decades before any measurable effects of so-called “global warming” could be detected to justify such climate manipulation.

The inescapable conclusion is that aerosols and electromagnetic weapons have been used for decades in order to justify pseudo-scientific findings by the IPCC that an epidemic of bad weather is caused by CO2 and greenhouse gases.

The WWII development of the V-2 rocket was the inspiration for space-based weapons deployment to control people on the ground regardless their nationality.

The post-war influx of NAZI scientists under the ironically named, “Operation Overcast” (later named Operation Paper-Clip), began the military effort of weaponizing the unreachable high altitudes of the atmosphere and outer space.

The 1978 Senate report – only made public in digital PDF in 2013 – confirms these aircraft dumps were carried out for decades under the guise of national defense. But the recent emergence of global United Nations governance over national sovereign has exposed the weaponization of space as a tool of the oligarch elite to ultimately control the global population regardless their disappearing notions of countries with borders.

 

EXPLOSIVE BOOK RELEASE: “Nobody Died At Sandy Hook” 5

The contributors to this book prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax to promote the Obama/ Holder gun-control agenda More…

RUSSIA TODAY: NATO Commander Tells Truth About “Chemical Trails” 3

Rumsfeld Military Chemtrails Tanker

.
General Fabio Mini, NAT CommanderGeneral Fabio Mini, NATO Commander:

“Concerning chemical trails, I’ll tell the truth.  I try to study this phnomenon in depth.  Now I’ll say something that could bother someone.  I used to think it was a swindel too but the pictures we can find online are really dreadful because the trails intersect regularly.”

.

.

Vatican connection to Chemical Trails and More – Click Here

Vatican Commemorative Coin Chemtrail 100 Lire

____________

Court Orders Monsanto to Pay Victims of Toxic Aircraft Contrail Emissions 3

agent orange the last battle-koppers-headerUS firms ordered to pay over Agent Orange

From: AAP  July 12, 2013

Chemtrails of Contrails spraying agent orangeSOUTH Korea’s highest court has upheld a ruling ordering two US Agent Orange makers to compensate 39 Vietnam War veterans in one of the country’s most prominent lawsuits.

The Supreme Court recognised the epidemiological correlation between the toxic defoliant and skin diseases for the first time, saying the 39 victims should receive a total of 466 million won ($A454,445) from Dow Chemical and Monsanto.

The veterans had complained that Agent Orange was responsible for skin diseases such as “chemical acne”, which is caused by exposure to dioxin contained in Agent Orange, the court said.

Payment is now up to the US firms, but Dow Chemical said in a statement quoted by Yonhap news agency that it disagrees with the Supreme Court’s decision as Friday’s verdict was not backed by clear evidence, citing US court rulings.

The South Korean court also reversed an appeals court verdict that the two firms should compensate thousands of other veterans who claimed to have similarly suffered from exposure to defoliants used during the Vietnam War.

Four-ship formation on a defoliation spray run. (U.S. Air Force photo)

More than 16,000 veterans filed separate lawsuits in 1999 against the US firms, seeking about five trillion won in damages, but a district court ruled against them.

agent_orange-spray_hIn 2006, an appeals court ordered the US firms to pay a total of 63 billion won in compensation to 6795 veterans and their families.

But the Supreme Court, in its ruling on Friday, sent the case back to the appeals court for review.

“There is no evidence their diseases were caused by their exposure to the defoliant sprayed during the Vietnam War,” it said in a statement.

South Korea sent some 300,000 troops to fight alongside the United States and southern Vietnamese forces during the war.

Agent-Orange-Dioxin-GMO-Monsanto-BarrelUS forces widely sprayed Agent Orange, which contained the lethal chemical dioxin, in Vietnam during the conflict to deprive enemy guerillas of forest cover and destroy food crops.

Veterans in South Korea estimate the number of Korean victims of the chemicals at about 150,000. Many insisted they were suffering from various ailments associated with exposure to the powerful herbicide.

Vietnam says millions of its people have died or suffered from direct or second-generation disabilities as a result of the use of Agent Orange.

Washington has never accepted responsibility for the Vietnamese government’s claim.

___________________________________

Message From Resident Victims of EPA Superfund Site –  9/13/2009

koppers dioxin agent orange-gGainesville residents, intended visitors, and those considering residency, please beware.  Our city’s heart is black and polluted.

Since its creation in 1916, for use as a chemical treatment facility for wood products, especially telephone poles and railroad ties using creosote, the officially federally (EPA) registered Cabot-Koppers Superfund (or Brownfields) site has been steadily and cumulatively chemically polluting Gainesville, to the point where this travesty can now no longer be ignored, having become a serious threat to the very future of Gainesville itself as a once pleasant place in which to live, to be educated, and to do business.

Lying just north-west of Downtown, the Cabot-Koppers site is STILL! being licensed by local authorities for the same industrial purpose, but it now uses an even more toxic and carcinogenic “chemical cocktail” known as Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA). This mix, used to protect “treated lumber”, is now known to present a major danger to Public Heath throughout the entire USA.

These, and multiple other such pollutants from Koppers, are officially known to be about to pollute the city’s very own water supply – the Murphree Aquifer.  These chemicals also constantly run off into the large Floridan Aquifer via a natural creek system. Moreover, toxic, dioxin-laden dust has only just been officially recognized as being yet another major pollutant, with dire consequences to the health of ALL Gainesville citizens, including students of the University of Florida, which lies a mere 2 miles from the Cabot-Koppers site.

___________________________________

USAF Physician in Charge of Assessing Troop and Civilian Health Damage From Agent Orange

Joel Michalek Air Force Health Study senior principle investigator

Dr. Joel Michalek

Dr. Joel Michalek listens to a reporter’s question during a press briefing on the Ranch Hand Study in the Pentagon on March 29, 2000.

The Ranch Hand Study, titled after the Vietnam operation of the same name, is the result of the 1997 physical examination of 2,300 Vietnam veterans exposed to the defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War.

Michalek is the U.S. Air Force Health Study senior principle investigator for the study(source)

MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering and Weather Modification 1

Activist Post Header

Source: Activist Post

NOTE:  Open Complete MIT report as PDF Here

By Derrick Broze

As humanity works to avoid further environmental and ecological destruction to the planet, scientists continue to search for possible solutions to the numerous issues facing our species. One of these proposed solutions has been the science of geoengineering.

According to a 2013 congressional report:

The term ‘geoengineering’ describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects.

In general, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) method or a solar radiation management (SRM) method. CDR methods address the warming effects of greenhouse gases by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. CDR methods include ocean fertilization, and carbon capture and sequestration. SRM methods address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmosphere or surface.

Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, but can be deployed faster with relatively immediate global cooling results compared to CDR methods.

Geoengineering is seen as a controversial solution, to say the least. That controversy is likely to deepen following a recent study from MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences. The study, published in Nature’s Scientific Reports, has found that ocean fertilization geoengineering would alter global rainfall patterns and affect water resources.

Ocean fertilization is a type of geoengineering that seeks to mimic the ability of phytoplankton, the microalgae at the base of most oceanic food webs, to photosynthesize sunlight. As the phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide, they also release dimethyl sulfide (DMS) into the atmosphere, which can form sulfate aerosols and reflect sunlight and cool the climate. Geoengineers hope to reproduce this natural process and thus reflect sunlight and cool the Earth.

According to Phys.org, the researchers used one of the global climate models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which simulates the evolution of and interactions among the ocean, atmosphere, and land masses. These simulations found that increased DMS emissions would actually lead to an increase of 1.2 degrees Celsius by 2100 and “substantial reduction in precipitation for some regions.”

Chien Wang, a co-author of the study and a senior research scientist at MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, said the study was “the first in-depth analysis of ocean fertilization that has highlighted the potential danger of impacting rainfall adversely.”

Benjamin Grandey, a senior postdoc in Wang’s group who configured the model simulations and analyzed the data, said that although “Generally, our results suggest that the cooling effect associated with enhanced DMS emissions would offset warming across the globe, especially in the Arctic,” it would also lead to dangerous changes in global weather. “Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically,” Grandey stated.

The lower rainfall could reduce water resources considerably and threaten the environment and livelihoods of the animals and people in the affected regions.

The MIT team is not the first to ring the alarm bells when it comes to geoengineering and other forms of weather modification. Although a number of authorities have warned about the dangers of geoengineering techniques, the risks are seen as secondary to the perceived risks of climate change. The interesting thing to note is that although proponents of geoengineering hail it as the solution to climate change and sustaining life, studies show that geoengineering could actually have the reverse effect of heating the Earth.

In February of 2015, an international committee of scientists released a report stating that geoengineering techniques are not a viable alternative to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat the effects of climate change. The committee report called for further research and understanding of various geoengineering techniques, including carbon dioxide removal schemes and solar-radiation management before implementation.

The scientists found that Solar Radiation Management, or albedo-modification techniques, are likely to present “serious known and possible unknown environmental, social, and political risks, including the possibility of being deployed unilaterally.” The report was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, the U.S. intelligence community, NASA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of Energy.

Another danger of manipulating the weather is the loss of blue skies. According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science has shown that releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere would scatter sunlight into the atmosphere. He says this could decrease the amount of sunlight that hits the ground by 20% and make the sky appear more hazy.

According to a 2013 study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, if geoengineering programs were started and then suddenly halted, the planet could see an immediate rise in temperatures, particularly over land. The study, titled, “The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management,” seems to indicate that once you begin geoengineering, you cannot suspend the programs without causing the very problem you were seeking to resolve.

What are the solutions to the many ecological and environmental problems facing humanity? The studies indicate that attempting to play God with the weather will have disastrous effects on the ability of the human population to live and prosper. If you fear the results of mad scientists controlling the weather or pursuing dangerous solutions like geoengineering, please share this article and continue to spread knowledge. It is time for the awakened people of this Earth to stand together against those who seek to destroy the planet — and seek solutions that work with Earth rather than seeking to dominate and exploit it.

Also Read: Masters Of The World Meet To Play God With The Climate

This article (MIT Study Warns About the Dangers of Geoengineering & Weather Modification) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Derrick Broze and theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! The Anti-Media radio show airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

9/11 BOMBSHELL: Cheney, Halliburton, Mossad, Art Students, Bomb Experts 3

SGT Report

THIS WILL SHOCK YOU TO YOUR CORE: 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad to Halliburton

Author, Rebekah Roth

______________

Rebekah Roth talks to Bill Ryan – Project Avalon

BIll Ryan Introduction (PDF)

______________

Methodical Deception by Rebekah RothOrder the Book

Obama’s connection to the Kelogg School of Management

In 2000, the Joyce Foundation provided a grant to Richard Sandor and Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management to develop a competing carbon trading software. At the time, Barack Obama was on the board of directors for the foundation. A second grant was made in 2001 and eventually led to the birth of the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), the only emissions reduction and trading system for all six greenhouse gases and the only operational cap and trade system in North America after their competition – Cantor Fitzgerald – was targeted for assassination by the False Flag events of 9/11.

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_10

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_13

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_07

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_12

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_06

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_04

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_02

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_01

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_05

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_03

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_11

911 Gelatin art students in WTC Tower_09