Loretta Lynch Assumed a Fake Name to Avoid Being Discovered Working With United Nations Foreign Agents in Order to Develop Corrupt and Unconstitutional Domestic Law Enforcement Policies under the global #StrongCities Network. The scheme enlists school officials and Law Enforcement to enact staged school shootings deceptively promoted by Propaganda News sources as Genuine Events.
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch used a fake name to conduct official Department of Justice (DOJ) business in agency emails obtained by Judicial Watch.
As the nation’s chief law enforcement officer Lynch, Barack Obama’s second attorney general, skirted public-records laws by using the alias Elizabeth Carlisle in emails she sent from her official DOJ account.
In the records provided to Judicial Watch, the DOJ explains it as necessary to “protect her security and privacy and enable her to conduct Department business efficiently via email.”
Obama and Lynch were busted when Judicial Watch requested the records as part of an investigation into the Obama administration’s involvement in a United Nation’s international law enforcement coalition called Strong Cities Network (SCN). The purported mission of the global coalition was to build social cohesion and community resilience to counter violent extremism. The DOJ masterminded the agreement and Americans found out about the U.S.’s participation when Lynch announced it during a U.N. speech on September 29, 2015. Lynch referred to SCN as a “truly groundbreaking endeavor” and assured the notoriously corrupt world body that the Obama administration was deeply committed to the new initiative. “The government of the United States is fully invested in this collaborative approach and we have seen the value of empowering local communities by promoting initiatives they design and lead themselves,” Lynch said. (Source, JW)
This begs the question of how many other government officials use fake names and whether those aliases are searched when agencies process Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
By removing the protection of the Smith-Mundt Act, the NDAA , as passed in 2012, allows the government and media to fabricate false events and narratives as social control propaganda. The result is that TV News and Print media can no longer be trusted or distinguished from Russia, where domestic propaganda is a principal government activity.
For the purpose of this article, the NDAA opens the door for creation of staged school shooting and related false flag events. We now see domestic policies on constitutionally protected gun rights rushed through the Florida legislature based on sensational fake shootings that are not investigated, then followed by a march into the Florida capitol by an insurgency of subversive crisis actors. Use your imagination as to what may be coming next. (More)
Max Keiser Explains Draconian NDAA
Loretta Lynch Announces Strong Cities Network?
“The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.” (More)
KrisAnne Hall, Esq. interprets the SCN as unconstitutional
“Violent Extremism” is Code for Gun Control
Eric Holder Wants School Board to “Brainwash” Kids About Guns
SIGN OF THE TIMES (SOTN)
Strong Cities Network:
Did the UN just install a global police force?
Amanda Warren Activist Post Mon, 05 Oct 2015
While people were in a daze of reverie following the lunar eclipse and the Pope’s U.S. visit, a very important yet overlooked announcement was made by the Department of Justice.
“Launch of Strong Cities Network to Strengthen Community Resilience Against Violent Extremism” rang the bell to usher in a global-local initiative to ferret out extremism at the local level – yes, in the United States. Symbolically, it could also signal a turning point when it comes to local authorities and their treatment of the residents at large. Indeed, it is a global enmeshment that most Americans are either a) in the total dark about, or b) going hysterical over, if they’ve heard about it.
Honestly, either of those reactions is understandable when you start digging into the announcements and its sponsors only to find the typical convoluted, global-psycho-babble that signals to the astute that they are about to lose their rights and be perceived as domestic terrorists. But can anyone really say for sure? Of course not. Not when the message is written in Newspeak gibberish.
What is the Strong Cities Network and why did some U.S. cities join up?
On the face of it, SCN is to strengthen the bond between cities in the U.S. and global cities in the fight against violent extremism, internationally and at the local level. It will funnel help to local authorities of those cities which hop on board.
From the press release:
“While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.” (More)
SCN is a Subversive United Nations Entity
False Flag School Shootings an SCN Agenda to Promote Gun Control?
The Strong Cities Network is run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a UK registered charity with charity number 1076660.
Launched at the United Nations in September 2015, the Strong Cities Network (SCN) is the first ever global network of mayors, municipal-level policy makers and practitioners united in building social cohesion and community resilience to counter violent extremism in all its forms.
Led by ISD ( Institute for Strategic Dialogue, UK) and comprised of more than 100 cities, the SCN builds collaboration between mayors, political actors and frontline teams to tackle polarisation, hate and violence in local communities in every major global region. The network catalyses, inspires and multiplies community-centric approaches and action to counter violent extremism through peer learning and expert training. It operates with a set of fundamental principles, agreed by all members, that protect and promote human rights and civil liberties in all aspects of its work to prevent violent extremism.
Officially adopted by the UN in 2015, the Strong Cities evidence reveals the concept was enacted in the US long before it was adopted by the ISD. A Strong Cities “franchise” can actually be traced to the 9/11 False Flag event. (NewYorkCityStrong)
Another rabbit-hole theory alleges Lance Armstrong’s “LIVESTRONG” motto takes the credit. Until 2012 “every red-blooded man and woman sported a yellow wristband with the words LIVESTRONG in relief. The iconic yellow band created wildfire support for Lance Armstrong’s fight against cancer and cancer research.” (Forbes) Despite the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency report that found Armstrong had participated in an elaborate doping scheme the already popular “Strong” theme was adapted to Sandy Hook in the same year and the Boston Marathon bombing in April 15th, 2013.
Still unexplored is the quiet intent to memorialize the life of globalist, Maurice Strong who died the same year as the inception of the SCN.
Maurice Frederick Strong (April 29, 1929 – November 27, 2015) was a Canadian oil and mineral businessman served as Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations. As head of UNEP, Strong convened the first international expert group meeting on climate change. (Wiki)
False Flag Shooting Cities Are Branded as “Strong Cities” with the fake school shooting at Marjory Stone Douglas high school branded as #PARKLAND STRONG
The Colorado Aurora theater shooting in 2012 was immediately branded as “#AuroraStrong” . By the way, Colorado is also listed as a member of the UN’s SCN charter. Now we have #SandyHookStrong, #OrlandoStrong #BostonStrong , #NewYorkCityStrong and others.
Peshawar, Pakistan is a SCN member, but the validity of the 2014 shooting at the Army Public School was seriously questioned when a picture of the child victim, “Noah Pozner” – who allegedly died at Sandy Hook school in 2012 – was heavily promoted as a Peshawar shooting victim. Noah’s alleged father “Lenny Pozner” has never provided an explanation.
Snopes offered a best-guess but that explanation brings into question the validity of every image used in the Peshawar school shooting.
Illustrating how government hides information from the American public, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch used a fake name to conduct official Department of Justice (DOJ) business in agency emails obtained by Judicial Watch. As the nation’s chief law enforcement officer Lynch, Barack Obama’s second attorney general, skirted public-records laws by using the alias Elizabeth Carlisle in emails she sent from her official DOJ account. In the records provided to Judicial Watch, the DOJ explains it as necessary to “protect her security and privacy and enable her to conduct Department business efficiently via email.”
This begs the question of how many other government officials use fake names and whether those aliases are searched when agencies process Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Besides Lynch, we have only discovered the use of such aliases among government operatives to conduct official business at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Obama’s EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, famously used the alias Richard Windsor in a government email account to conduct official business and communicate with staff. Jackson even took required EPA computer training under the fake identity with the handle Windsor.Richard@epa.gov. She eventually resigned over the scandal, which brought to light the agency’s violations of federal open-records laws.
In Lynch’s case, Judicial Watch requested the records as part of an investigation into the Obama administration’s involvement in a United Nation’s international law enforcement coalition called Strong Cities Network (SCN). The purported mission of the global coalition was to build social cohesion and community resilience to counter violent extremism. The DOJ masterminded the agreement and Americans found out about the U.S.’s participation when Lynch announced it during a U.N. speech on September 29, 2015. Lynch referred to SCN as a “truly groundbreaking endeavor” and assured the notoriously corrupt world body that the Obama administration was deeply committed to the new initiative. “The government of the United States is fully invested in this collaborative approach and we have seen the value of empowering local communities by promoting initiatives they design and lead themselves,” Lynch said.
Following the Attorney General’s fiery U.N. delivery, a New York newspaper reported that the city was joining a new global, terror-busting network to combat homegrown extremism. Civil rights groups quickly denounced the U.S. participation, expressing concerns about law enforcement abuses against Muslims. In a letter to New York Mayor Bill de Blasio 22 civil rights groups warned that other programs created to counter violent extremism stigmatized “Muslim communities as suspicious and in need of special monitoring.” The anti-terror initiatives have also made “the relationship between Muslims and schools and social service providers into security-based engagements,” the letter states. SCN assures however, that “violent extremism and prevention efforts should not be associated with any particular religion, nationality or ethnic group.” In a statement the DOJ also guaranteed that the SCN will safeguard the rights of local citizens and communities. The State Department also put its weight behind SCN.
In its mission to educate the public about the operations and activities of government, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request with the DOJ on October 15, 2015 for documents related to SCN. Specifically, Judicial Watch asked for legal opinions and analysis prepared by the DOJ relating to the U.S. involvement in the program, documents that form the foundation for the decision for the country to participate in SCN, all international agreements and related records involving the commitment of U.S. resources or personnel to SCN and records of communication between officials in the Office of the Attorney General relating to the initiative. The DOJ claimed to have no records related to the SCN and billed Judicial Watch a startling $50,000 to conduct the search that didn’t produce a single file.
Though the DOJ recently furnished the documents with Lynch’s fake name, the records were part of Judicial Watch’s original 2015 FOIA request. The records also show that then Assistant Attorney General John Carlin touted SCN at an event sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an extremist leftist group that helped a gunman commit an act of terrorism against a conservative organization.
A year later Carlin would launch the Michael Flynn counterintelligence investigation and seek the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant now in question.
- Member Cities: Strong Cities Network
- “Boston Strong,” the phrase that rallied a city. How’d we find a unifying phrase so fast? It’s been evolving for years.
- New York City Strong (9/11 False Flag)
- Institute for Strategic Dialogue, UK (ISD) Publications – With the assistance of Google/YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, ISD helped train over twenty peacebuilding CSOs in online counter-narrative creation. (trolls/censorship/FB, Twitter and Youtube account termination)