ICE AGE COMETH? North Pole Frozen Solid – South Pole Re-Freezing 7

Comment:  Clandestine efforts to control and warm the climate with aerosol geoengineering are probably failing to overcome the inconvenient truth of a powerful mini ice-age.  This could explain the increase of carbon-black aerosol dumps in daylight hours as a desperate attempt to provide credibility to the failed IPCC, climate warming model predictions.

Dutch Since – 2/28/2015:

So much for “global warming”, and so much for the “melted” North Pole, and “melted” South Pole.

Clearly, the North Pole is at 100% ice pack from Canada to Russia. Ice reaching as far south as Nova Scotia .. reaching out into the Atlantic fully surrounding Svalbard, almost reaching ICELAND!!!

The icepack can be seen growing BEYOND the arctic circle at this point, reaching out into the North Atlantic.

Meanwhile, we have new reports coming in on the East coast of the United States that “strange frozen waves” of slush water are hitting the shores of areas as far South as Massachusetts. https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2015/0…

Indeed it might seem strange to people on the East coast, since the ocean normally stays above freezing point. However due to the massive ice concentrations at the North Pole, it now appears to be spreading as far South as the United States.

The Antarctic South Pole is also still under ice. Unlike last year, we are seeing large areas of ice remain in place, now going into fall season in the Southern Hemisphere, you can see the South Pole ice pack is starting to even out, and grow

Last year, the South pole had RECORD levels of ice, thus it is no surprise that this year we are seeing vast areas of the South Pole remain covered in 100% concentrations of ice.

Check the levels for yourself, and see that the “global warming”, and “melted poles” stories are totally false. http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/

7 comments

  1. Pingback: Things of interest today 03.01.2015 | Jernigan's War - Ken Gallender

  2. If you go to the bottom of the page on that link you will see another link for background information on historic sea ice minima. It clearly shows a sharp decline from 1978 onwards that reveals just how tiny this “recovery” really is, one of many small variations on the plummeting line of best fit. It’s important to look at the big picture before jumping to erroneous conclusions.
    Also, Arctic sea ice thickness, the more relevant measure, shows a sharp decline with no such “recovery”.
    So it would appear that the very deliberate operation to warm the Arctic has been successful so far.

    • My extensive article on the history of geoengineering reveals the concepts and proposals to melt arctic ice have been at play since the formation of standard oil. It all fits together as deliberate global warming blamed on co2 as a strategic economic boondoggle while BIG OIL uses chemtrails to gain access to arctic oil. – never mind the ecological impact to the planet.

      • It was that article that really set me off in this direction. Before that (around 2010)I had some vague notion that HAARP was involved in global warming. That’s only partly true as I now believe.

        BIG OIL in my view is inseparable from BIG STICK.

        The commercial aspect of the deliberate effort to melt the Arctic fits the Military/Industrial agenda like a hand in a glove.

        Chapter from Unless Peace Comes 1968
        HOW TO WRECK THE ENVIRONMENT
        by Gordon J. F. MacDonald U.S.A.
        http://plausiblefutures.wordpress.com/2 … w-weapons/

        “If a nation’s meteorologists calculated that a general warming or cooling of the Earth was in their national interest, improving their climate while worsening others, the temptation to release materials from high-altitude rockets might exist. At present we know too little about the paradoxical effects of warming and cooling, however, to tell what the outcome might be.”

        In his article in 1968 Macdonald outlined a potential method for inducing global cooling and concluded that the beneficiary of such a program would be some landlocked equatorial country.
        “Who would stand to benefit from such application? The logical candidate, would be a landlocked equatorial country. An extended glacial period would ensure near-Arctic conditions over much of the temperate zone, but temperate climate with abundant rainfall would be the rule in the present tropical regions.”
        Whilst the tropical regions would enjoy a temperate climate with abundant rainfall, the temperate regions would no longer be temperate, but would suffer near-Arctic conditions.
        What if we turned this hypothesis on its head? What if instead of some landlocked country, the major countries of the northern temperate zones decided to collude to influence the climate to their advantage? After all, it is clear that the global power base that would have the technology, is in this region not in some “equatorial landlocked country”.
        They wouldn`t be interested in inflicting near Arctic conditions upon themselves but the opposite, the kind of warm climate that enabled the Vikings to once settle Greenland. They would see the far northern climes opened up to commerce and exploitation for their vast resources.
        The landlocked equatorial regions would suffer intense heat and drought whilst those closer to the sea would suffer catastrophic flooding as predicted by James Hansen in his book, Storms of my Grandchildren. This would align with the globalists` views on population control.
        In other words, a global warming would surely be the desired outcome for the global power brokers.
        Is this in fact, not what we are seeing in the world today?

  3. A while back I posted a link to this paper from way back in 1970
    ON THE POSSIBILITY OF WEATHER MODIFICATION BY AIRCRAFT CONTRAILS
    http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/098 … 0-0745.pdf
    This fellow even implies, in 1970, that they MIGHT BE PART OF SOME COVERT OPERATION TO MODIFY THE GLOBAL CLIMATE AS PROPOSED BY ANOTHER SCIENTIST IN 1965.
    “The writer himself has seen instances in which a single contrail seemed to grow until it became an overcast covering the whole sky. If the contrail were indeed responsible, which is by no means certain, this would constitute definite proof that contrails are capable of SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON LOCAL WEATHER, AND EVEN POSSIBLY ON
    GLOBAL CLIMATE, IF SUCH OCCURRENCES ARE WIDESPREAD AND
    FREQUENT.”
    “THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS ARE CONSIDERABLE;
    IN FACT, IT SEEMS PROBABLE THAT ONE OF THE PROJECTS FOR
    MODIFYING THE GLOBAL CLIMATE DISCUSSED BY FLETCHER (1965),
    NAMELY MODIFICATION OF THE CLOUD COVER OVER THE NORTH
    POLAR BASIN BY CLOUD SEEDING, IS ALREADY UNDERWAY, ALTHOUGH
    THE SCALE IS STILL MORE MODEST THAN HE ENVISIONED.”

    It’s no longer modest.

    This should put to rest the notion that contrails of an extraordinary nature did not exist prior to 1997 put it should also put to rest the notion that an organized, global effort to modify the climate is a relatively new idea.

    Now I have found a paper written by the scientist referred to in this paper, J.O. Fletcher in 1969. Fletcher discusses modification of cloud cover over the North Polar Basin by Cloud Seeding. Yes, cloud seeding and the intent of such an operation is quite clearly for causing a warming to melt the Arctic ice. It corresponds to an astounding degree with what I have been suggesting is actually underway.

    Managing Climatic Resources
    http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2009/P4000-1.pdf · PDF file

    I recommend that you read the whole paper but I have taken out some excerpts of particular interest.

    “Still another form of growing pollution, and one whose possible effects have received little study, is the creation of cirrus cloudiness (vapour trails) by the exhaust products of high-flying aircraft.
    Increases cloudiness of any form tends to increase the reflectivity (albedo) of the Earth and, according to Bryson’s calculations, a 1% increase in mean albedo would cool the Earth by 1.6OC. However, it should be noted that increased cloudiness at high levels greatly reduces radiative loss to space, and this would have a warming effect on the Earth. Thus, the dual effects of more or less cloudiness are great, but the direction of the net influence depends on the type and height of the clouds, and whether they are in a dark or sunlit region of the Earth.”

    “Possibilities for Purposeful Influence on Global Climate
    It has for example been noted that the creation of dissipation of high cloudiness has an enormous influence on the heat budget of the atmosphere and of the surface. It is estimated that it would take only sixty C-5 aircraft to deliver 1kg per km2 per day over the entire Arctic Basin (10 to the 7 km2). Thus, it is a large but not impossible task to see such enormous areas.
    Assuming that such seeding were effective in creating or dissipating clouds, it is of interest to estimate the effect of such cloud modification on the heat budget of the surface/atmosphere system. It is estimated that the presence of average cloudiness over the Arctic in July decreases the radiative heat loss to space by about 350 billion cal/km2/day from what it would be without clouds. By comparison, total cloud at 500 meters would decrease radiative heat loss by only 500 billion cal/km2 per day., while total cloud at 5000 meters would decrease radiative loss by about 1000 billion cal/km2/per day.”

    “These numbers demonstrate not only the enormous thermal leverage that might be exercised by influencing mean cloudiness, but also the range of influence that might be possible, depending on cloud type, height, and its influence on the regional heat budget. This conclusion is further underscored by noting that mean monthly values of radiative heat loss at the surface have been observed to vary by more than 100% in different years at some Arctic stations possibly due to variations in cloudiness.”

    “Ice free Arctic Ocean

    The largest scale enterprise that has been discussed is that of transforming the Arctic into an ice-free ocean. As was noted earlier, this has been carefully studied by the staff of the Main Geophysical Observatory in Leningrad. The central question is the stability of the ensuing global climatic regime. This question cannot be adequately evaluated until global climate simulation models are better developed and suitable simulations performed.
    There is also a certain amount of uncertainty in regard to the engineering feasibility of removing the Arctic pack ice. It is possible that the capacity of the present technology may be sufficient to accomplish this task, but this has not been established.
    Three basic approaches have been proposed ( Fletcher, 1965): (1) influencing the surface reflectivity of the ice to cause more absorption of solar heat; (2) large-scale modification of Arctic cloud conditions by seeding; (3) increasing the inflow of warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean.”

    “International Cooperation

    The management of global climatic resources is a problem shared by all nations. So far, international efforts in climatic research have been directed toward observation and understanding , and cooperation has been good. It is a challenge to political and scientific leadership to preserve this spirit of cooperation as further progress is achieved toward prediction and control.”

    And here we are today…….

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s