A previous post exposed the issue of foreknowledge when videos dealing with the aftermath of the alleged missile attack, were revealed to be produced prior to the crash of Flt MH-17. (More)
On July 20th, the Corbett Report published a useful summary that discloses many irregularities in corporate media coverage and international governmental propaganda sources. (More)
Now we look at more media propaganda published as perception management to global audiences.
EXHIBIT A: The aircraft allegedly shot down over Shaktarsk is a Boeing 777-200, (Tail number, 9M-MRD) – the identical model aircraft (Boeing 777-200) that remains missing in the mysterious disappearance on Flt. MH-370 – tail number, 9M-MRO).
Recent, “near conclusive” evidence reports that MH-370 (9M-MRO) was actually hijacked raising the possibility that aircraft parts from 9M-MRO could have been salvaged, altered, re-painted and used to create the crash scene for MH-17 (9M-MRD).
EXHIBIT B: Mail Online Reported the allegedly doomed Flight MH-17 carrying the tail number 9M-MRD was allegedly photographed by a passenger before boarding. Closer inspection of the nose gear (See EXHIBIT A) reveals the aircraft carries the tail number 9M-MRC. This finding makes it impossible that the “doomed flight” photo was taken on the day of departure. Records available in EXHIBIT G show that the previous departure of 9M-MRC from Amsterdam occurred on 7/11/2014 as flight MH-17.
EXHIBIT C: Photos of the crash scene reveal key sections of aircraft wreckage that appear like landscape at “stone henge”. Of interest is the section of aircraft containing the tail number or “N” number (9M-MRO or 9M-MRD) that serves as a registration number to identify a particular aircraft in the Malaysia Airlines fleet.
The Tail Number for the allegedly doomed flight is 9M-MRD. The tail section apparently fell from the sky in a vertical position as a convenient opportunity for photographers to easily show the world this plane is not to be confused with tail number 9M-MRO from the flight MH-370 – the Malaysia airliner that is now revealed to have been hijacked.
EXHIBIT D: Prominent photo of tail section with Malaysia Airlines logo (livery) provides observers with hollow assurance that the aircraft was positively identified as 9M-MRD.
With the example of this “agent” walking all over the crash scene evidence, the media has already promoted the idea that the NTSB or designated crash scene investigators will not likely be able to carry out a competent investigation. After all, what would a thorough forensic analysis of the crash scene be obligated to report if it were allowed to take place?
EXHIBT E: Alleged crash scene baggage seems too clean to be true. How likely is it that not one ripped, burnt, charred, shredded or blood-stained item can be detected in this photo?
EXHIBIT F: Flight Radar-24 screen capture on the day following the crash (7/18) shows MH-17, (9M-MRD) as “canceled” on the date of the crash (7/17). Why is it reported that the “doomed” flight was “canceled” before it was struck by a missile?
As horrific as the crash was reported to be, why did Malaysia Airlines boldly resume normal scheduling of the MH-17 flight for the following day (7/18) and before the risk of a repeated missile attack could be determined.? The screen-shot was taken after takeoff and while the aircraft (9M-MRL) was still in the air and presumably “safely” en route. When did Malaysia Airlines determine “business as usual” was more important than air safety?
EXHIBIT G: The record shows that from June 12 through July 17, thirteen (13) different B-777 aircraft were assigned to fly the MH-17 flight schedule for a total of 36 trips from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.
Of special interest is the last flight for 9M-MRD on this route prior to the alleged crash occurred on June 18, 2014 . During this interval only 3 other aircraft flew the route only one time:
(1) 9M-MRM on 6/16, (2) 9M-MRF on 7/5 and (3) 9M-MRC on 7/11.
Two of the aircraft flew the route within 12 and 6 days, respectively with the probability both aircraft could fly again before exceeding a 30 day hiatus. This distinguishes 9M-MRD and 9M-MRM as the only two – out of 13 aircraft – to exceed a 3 week hiatus between scheduled service as Flight MH-17.
EXHIBIT H: The starboard section of the fuselage contains important evidence about the configuration of the windows beneath the flag. Archive photos from 2014 show both aircraft were fitted with the metal “plug” aft of the flag rather than a transparent window. To be clear, this finding, alone does not serve as significant evidence that the aircraft in the photo is actually the hijacked MH-370/9M-MRO but is worth filing for future reference. Photos of each aircraft showing the metal plug configuration from are available: 9M-MRD Feb 8, 2014 and 9M-MRO Jan 4, 2014
“Michael Holmes of CNN shared an image on Twitter via his account @holmescnn of a section of what appears to be a Malaysia Airlines jetliner on a grassy field. The Malaysian flag is clearly depicted and the red and blue livery colours used by MAS are also shown.”
The source of the images, a man identifying himself as a tourist guide / traveller / photographer / former soldier from Slovenia, @MatevzNovak, has since posted more photos – taken by a Nadezhda Chernetskaya – of what he claims to be the crash site of Flight MH17 in Grabovo, Ukraine. (TRNS)
There is much more to discover about this story that bankster controlled media will never report. If you are paying for cable TV you are most likely financing the largest source of disinformation on earth.