Geoengineering The Skies in North Florida 4-14-2014 8

4/14 2014 – Gainesville, Florida:

High altitude atmospheric data reveals no conditions of near saturated relative humidity exist at flight levels above 29,000 feet (8,841 meters) to explain formation of persistent contrails and/or persistent-spreading contrails in this example.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

4.14.2014: Top photo taken at dawn. Botton photo near 8 AM local time

High altitude atmospheric data reveals no conditions of near saturated relative humidity exist at flight levels above 29,000 feet (8,841 meters) to explain formation of persistent contrails and/or persistent-spreading contrails in this example.

The absence of near-saturated relative humidity points to release of non water vapor jet emissions as deliberate and covert deployment of aerosols into the troposphere. (1)

Relative humidity is the amount of moisture in the air compared to what the air can “hold” at that temperature. When the air can’t “hold” all the moisture, then it condenses as dew. (Dew Point) (2)

The USAF contrail science facts document requires that relative humidity (RH)  be near saturation. (ie: RH near 100% ) at the altitude where the aircraft is flying.

” If the atmosphere is near saturation, the contrail may exist for some time. Conversely, if the atmosphere is dry, the contrail will dissipate quickly.” (3)

The Case for Covert Geoengineering to Produce Deliberate Surface Warming and Climate Change.

man_made_global_warming_is-chemtrails-xyThe IPCC and NASA Agree on significant climate change effects of contrails and thin, high (Cirrus) clouds.

“Contrails tend to warm the Earth’s surface, similar to thin high clouds”. (4)

Artificial clouds sprayed by jet aircraft can “change the climate and affect natural resources”. (5)

Sources:

NASA Contrail Education

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

 

 

 

8 comments

  1. Please Google the ‘Appleman Chart’ and re-evaluate your relative humidity comment. This chart should be referred to by all those involved in assessing con vs chem trail formations. It’s blatantly obvious that ‘they’ are spaying chemical cocktails into our skies daily around the globe. To expose them we must know ‘the science’ better than they do. This chart is a MUST for all theorists to know cold – it’s the physics for contrail formation – any violation of the physics and it’s proof positive of an artificial contrail AKA: chemtrail. All the Best…chembro2

    • You are correct to point out the Appleman chart but what/whose comment do you think needs to be corrected? Be specific.

    • Appleman chart used here in Gainesville chemtrails incident from 2012 where WCJB, Bill Quinlan meteorologist is involved. Quinlan’s comments demonstrate that TV News Weather forecasters are NOT necessarily informed on contrail physics.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s