Bipartisan Resolution Seeks Public Disclosure of 9/11 Inside Job 2

Boston Herald headerOpen the 9/11 books
Saturday, December 7, 2013

Most of the public has likely forgotten that the congressional report on the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York City and Washington contained a secret section. It’s still secret. But kudos to U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and a colleague for their bipartisan effort to uncover these surely unnecessary secrets.

Lynch and his co-sponsor of a resolution requesting the president to declassify the relevant 28 pages have been permitted to read the material themselves.

Rep Walter Jones and Sttephen Lynch mugs

“These pages contain information that is vital to a full understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding this tragedy,” Lynch said in a statement announcing the resolution.

His colleague, Rep. Walter B. Jones (R-N.C.), hinted at the nature of what’s being hidden: “The information contained in the redacted pages is critical to our foreign policy moving forward and should thus be available to the American public. If the 9/11 hijackers had outside help — particularly from one or more foreign governments — the press and the public have a right to know what our government has or has not done to bring justice to all of the perpetrators.”

If some government — or part of a government — helped the attackers, did it know what they were up to? What was the help? Money? Advice? Instruction?

Did the administration of then-President George W. Bush extract some favor in return for keeping quiet? Did the administration fear that open punishment would alienate an ally?

The questions matter and, as always, secrecy encourages belief in the worst possible situation.

An ally that would knowingly help committed terrorists kill more than 3,000 people is no ally. If that happened, it must carry a penalty to discourage others.
911-twin Towers Crime Scene

2 comments

  1. What Jones and Lynch found can be read in Dimitri Khalezov’s 9/11 book.

    Download links:

    Or read at:

    In a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can’t build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center’s demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.

    Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.

    Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.

    More info:
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htm

    You can watch the 2010 interview at:
    http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
    Video # 4 – WTC’s demolition plan
    Video # 14 – WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).
    Videos # 24/25 – chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)

    Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:
    http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/

    I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes but go check the definition of ‘Ground Zero’ in the old dictionaries you have at home. You’ll find that there would only be one definition and it would be a place where a nuclear explosion has occurred.

    After 9/11, the US government sent people round to every bookshop and public library on the planet to replace ALL the dictionaries with amended versions which have more definitions for ‘Ground Zero’. For example, the new versions (even of old editions) of the Merriam-Webster dictionaries have two extra definitions which are:
    2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change
    3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONE

    Have a look at this video:

    At 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of ‘Ground Zero’.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s