Will Governments Be Forced to Geoengineer the Climate – Or Have They Already Started? 2

Topt secret writers header7/3/2013

Geo-engineering is defined as a “large-scale intervention in the earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming”. (1)

There are two components to climate control. The first is a removal of carbon dioxide within the atmosphere, which many scientists believe is building too rapidly and creating a “greenhouse effect”.

Other scientists believe the climate change and the greenhouse effect are both natural occurrence and processes. These scientists believe that these two events are widely misunderstood.  *** continue

Chemtrail Nano-Bots: Climate Change Through Self-Replicating Aerosols 6

NOTE:  Contrary to disinfo rumors of “conspiracy theory”, the Department of Defense first published “Chemtrails” in 1990 as the title to a chemistry course for new pilots attending the esteemed US Air Force Academy. The term “Chemtrails”, and its implied meaning was eventually adopted by civilian observers to describe unusual jet contrail emissions.  Download 26 MB Chemtrails PDF file  HERE

Also see:  ” Aluminum in Chemtrails Linked to Rapid Increase in Neurogenic Disorders”, – Dr. Russell Blaylock



Nano-chemtrails comparative size

by William Thomas (Bio)

If you did not enjoy “traditional” chemtrails raining down on you, you are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable “smart” molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints.

Under development since 1995, the military’s goal is to install microprocessors incorporating gigaflops computer capability into “smart particles” the size of a single molecule.

Invisible except under the magnification of powerful microscopes, these nano-size radio-controlled chips are now being made out of mono-atomic gold particles. Networked together on the ground or assembling in the air, thousands of sensors will link into a single supercomputer no larger than a grain of sand.

Brought to you by the same military-corporate-banking complex that runs America’s permanent wars, Raytheon Corp is already profiting from new weather warfare technologies. The world’s fourth largest military weapons maker bought E-Systems in 1995, just one year after that military contractor bought APTI, holder of Bernard Eastlund’s HAARP patents.

Raytheon also owns General Dynamics, the world’s leading manufacturer of military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles.

Raytheon also reports the weather for NOAA through its AWIPS  Advanced Weather Information Processing System. According to researcher Brendan Bombaci of Durango, Colorado, these Raytheon computers are directy linked with their UAV weather modification drones. Bombaci reports that NOAA paid Raytheon more than $300 million for this “currently active, 10-year project.”

She goes on to describe the Joint Environmental Toolkit used by the U.S. Air Force in its Weather Weapons System. Just the thing for planet tinkerers.

For public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized. “Microelectric Mechanical Sensors” (MMS) and “Global Environmental Mechanical Sensors” sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct 31/05]

According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress, “The green light has been given” to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for “global warming mitigation.”

U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones “are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare,” Military Progress asserts. This dual mission – to slow global warming and use weather as a weapon – seems somewhat contradictory.

man_made_global_warming_is-chemtrails-xyFIGHTING FOR CLIMATE CHANGE
U.S. Military Inc. is already in the climate change business big time. The single biggest burner of petroleum on this planet, its high-flying aircraft routinely rend Earth’s protective radiation shielding with nitrous oxide emissions, while depositing megatons of additional carbon, sulfur and water particles directly into the stratosphere – where they will do three-times more damage than CO2 alone.

Go figure. A single F-15 burns around 1,580 gallons an hour. An Apache gunship gets about one-half mile to the gallon. The 1,838 Abrams tanks in Iraq achieve five gallons to the mile, while firing dusty radioactive shells that will continue destroying human DNA until our sun goes supernova.

A single non-nuclear carrier steaming in support burns 5,600 gallons of bunker fuel in an hour – or two million gallons of bunker oil every 14 days. Every four days, each carrier at sea takes on another half- million gallons of fuel to supply its jets.

The U.S. Air Force consumed nearly half of the Department of Defense’s entire fuel supply in 2006, burning 2.6 billion gallons of jet fuel aloft.

While flying two to five-hour chemtrails missions to reflect incoming sunlight and slow global warming, a single KC-10 tanker will burn 2,050 gallons of highly toxic jet fuel every hour. The larger and older KC-135 Stratotanker carries 31,275 gallons of chemtrails and burns 2,650 gallons of fuel per hour.

The EPA says that each gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 pounds of CO2. Each gallon of diesel produces 22.2 pounds of CO2.

Total it up and routine operations by a military bigger than all other world militaries combined puts more than 48 billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year. Nearly half that total could be eliminated by ending the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. [TomDispatch.com June 16/07; huffingtonpost.com Oct 29/07]

Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T

According to the air force’s own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025, clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.

Then these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm’s size and intensity – and “steer” it to “specific targets”.

The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails “will be able to adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make adjustments throughout the process.” Instead of being sprayed into the air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano versions will be able to “enhance their dispersal” by “adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy” and “communicating with each other” as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.

Nano-chemtrails will even “change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects,” the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]

Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military’s hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots: “Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions – clouds of microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with a control system, could provide tremendous capability.”

Sounds expensive.

“It is potentially relatively inexpensive to do,” Hall clarified. “About the same price per pound as potatoes.”

Why so cheap? Because nano particles can be potentially self-replicating. That is, they can be made to reproduce themselves until programmed to stop.




Chemtrails tankers Panel Header-B

Owning The Weather goes on to say that the USAF will “manage and employ a weather-modification capability by the Weather Force Support Element.” These weather forces will use real-time updates from swarms of the nano-size “smart sensors” to model developing weather patterns with a super-duper computer.

Based on continually updated forecast, the weather warriors will fly follow-on missions as needed to tweak the storm. It’s perfect, crows the air force. “The total weather-modification process becomes “a real-time loop of continuous, appropriate, measured interventions, and feedback capable of producing desired weather behavior.”


Weather modification did not work too well with Katrina.

If the notion of inserting Autonomous Intelligence nanobots into weather systems to monitor, steer and mess with them seems risky, just wait. Around the next cloud corner are coming swarms of airborne nano-bots to optimize wind dispersal patterns for germ warfare. Or chemtrails.

But there’s one small hitch. Nobody knows how Earth’s atmosphere works. It is so big, so complex and so unpredictable, even real-time nano-snapshots are ancient history as soon as they are taken.

This is why the air force said, “Advances in the science of chaos are critical to this endeavor.”

Good luck. After a decade of trying, not even a 48-hour weather forecast can be made without constant surprises.

Because they cannot be graphed in a cause-and-effect straight line, chaotic “non-linear” weather processes can morph unexpectedly, defying predicted weather modification inputs. Just ask Beijing.

Then there’s the matter of accidental genocide. I mean human health.

The chemtrails we are too familiar with after a decade-long dose continue to inflict eye infections, nosebleeds, skin sores, muscle pain, chronic exhaustion, weakened immunity, acute asthma and allergies, short-term memory loss and heart attacks on people in more than a dozen countries. [Chemtrails Confirmed 2008 by William Thomas]

Small particulates like the aluminum oxide found in chemtrails also kill.

Dr. Dan Woodard calls aluminum oxide a “nuisance dust”. This MD says that prolonged exposures to very high concentrations of particulates that are visible in the air “can produce pulmonary fibrosis, somewhat like the silicosis formerly seen in miners.”

“At one time it was thought to precipitate Alzheimer’s disease, but more recent research has shown it is almost certainly unrelated,” Dr. Woodward adds.

Nano-particles of alumina are highly reactive and can cross the blood-brain barrier  ” Aluminum in Chemtrails Linked to Rapid Increase in Neurogenic Disorders”, – Dr. Russell Blaylock

It’s the tiny size of chemtrail fallout – one-tenth the width of the human hair – that make people very ill. The EPA warns that there is a strong link between all tiny particles and thousands of premature deaths each year.

Two key studies from the early 1990’s by the Harvard School of Public Health and the American Cancer Society found strong links between high levels of small particles and a rise in death rates. In an article headlined, “Tiny Particles Can Kill” the August 5, 2000 issue of New Scientist pointed to findings in six cities over 16 years showing that “city-dwellers in Europe and the U.S. are dying young because of microscopic particles in the air.”

According to the New York Times, “microscopic motes… are able to infiltrate the tiniest compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream.” Particles in the size range called for by the Welsbach Patent describing chemtrails are “most strongly tied to illness and early death, particularly in people who are already susceptible to respiratory problems.” [New York Times Oct 14/06]

The Welsbach Chemtrails Patent US 5003186 calls for megatons of 10 micron-size aluminum oxide particles to be spread in the atmosphere. The EPA calls particles this small “an extreme human health hazard” leading to 5% increased death rate within 24 hrs.

“Hearts as well as lungs can be damaged by ultra-fine particles small enough to get into the bloodstream and inflame tissues and cells,” reports the LA Times. “After they reach the heart, the particles are thought to cause a stress reaction in cells, producing inflammation that contributes to heart disease. The particles also may cause blood clots.” [Los Angeles Times Dec 29/03]

The Neurotoxicology (brain poisoning) division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says that exposure to airborne Particulate Matter “is an environmental health risk of global proportions.” [Health Risks Of Aerosoled Particulates PubMed Abstract]

The EPA explains that by penetrating deep into the lungs and circulatory system, these dust-size particles “are implicated in tens of thousands of deaths annually from both respiratory and coronary disease.”

POP QUIZ: What do you think will happen when nano-size machines tens of thousands of times smaller than this are sprayed into the open air?

Nanoparticles might better be called Nastyparticles because they make a beeline for the brain as soon as they are inhaled. Not surprisingly, they tend to accumulate and clump in the area of the brain that deals with smell. Too big to pass back through the blood-brain barrier, they become trapped there. [Nature.com Jan 5/04]

Dr. Celine Filippi also observed that nanoparticles inhaled into the lungs are so mall they easily cross the lung barrier and enter the blood. “Particles in the blood can reach the liver, amongst other organs.” [globalresearch.ca Oct 21/07]

So are we being sprayed with nano-chemtrails?

Owning The Weather 2025 was published in 1995 and discussed only non-classified military weather modification projects. Hall’s Overview of Nanotechnology also appeared in 1995, when nanotech was in its Frankenstein infancy. Since then, many sources tell us, nanotech has gone exponential. [nanotech-now.com]

The term “nano-chemtrails” on my homepage prompted my trusted military informant I’ve dubbed “Hank” to call.

“They have them,” he confirmed. The U.S. Air Force has occasionally added nanoparticles to the chemtrail mix to demonstrate proof of concept.

“We’re way beyond science fiction,” Hank confirmed. ” You can hide just about anything you want in a chemtrail – including nanotubes. Chemtrails are being altered for whatever spectrum of wavelength they’re trying to bounce off of them.

Morgellons Syndrome Photos

The specimen in the dish is expectorant from a “positive” Morgellons red wine test.  The patient drinks and holds a small amount of  red wine  in the mouth for about one minute then spits the contents into a dish.  If  “clumps” of fibers are seen, this probably indicates the patient has been exposed to bio-engineered fibers that can manifest as a Morgellons-like syndrome of skin lesions with protruding fibers.  (source)

Carnicom morgellons red-wine peroxide test

Expectorant from “positive” red-wine/peroxide test

MORGELLONS  (Carnicom Institute)
What about Morgellons? Is there any connection between this bizarre and frightening malady and nano experiments?”You’re not going to like this,” Hank said. “Morgellons is one unintended manifestation of nano spray experiments. “Morgellons manifests – or presents” – as intolerable itching in the skin followed by alien eruptions of thin hairs or tendrils through the skin. “It’s basically the same as excreting something through a hair follicle,” Hank said.He meant a toxin – something foreign to the body.”If you manufacture a liquid super-cyrstalline structure, vibrate it a little and give it an electrical charge – it will form into a chain.”These nanotubes will be invisible to the eye, of course. But their tendency to clump together could eventually make them big enough to be photographed and posted on the web.

How much nanocrap has been sprayed so far?

“Tens of tons,” he replied.

Tens of tons of molecules?

“Much of it is still up there,” Hank went on to explain. This is because nanoparticles are so light and small they tend bind to bind with oxygen molecules. And piggybacking on oxygen particles makes them buoyant.

“It travels worldwide,” Hank continued. “Some of it comes down. Whatever it’s exposed to up there it brings down here. We get exposed to it. We breathe it in, we ingest it. It accrues in the same spot every time. And attracts more of it… “

In the liver.

And brain.

“The fallout would look like a prion disease,” Hank said.

“Fallout from nanoparticles would eat holes in our brains?”

“Pretty much. Nano particles are ionized particles that go to what attracts them…. Because of their electro-chemical properties, they are attracted to the potassium-calcium channel in the brain.”

Think about it, he said. “If they are capable of withstanding the corrosive upper atmosphere – corrosive sunlight and all those (industrial) chemicals – what would they have to be manufactured out of? Does the body manufacture anything that can deal with that? Who will come forward and say these are good?

A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.
-EPA Air Quality Management Rule 402.


Incredible Technology: How to Engineer the Climate Reply

live science header

Incredible Technology:  How to Engineer the Climate

Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer

Date: 01 July 2013

Editor’s Note: In this weekly series, LiveScience explores how technology drives scientific exploration and discovery.

Greenhouse gases are heating up the planet, spurring plenty of controversy about whether — and how — to stop pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  But some scientists are looking at another option, one they often see as an emergency brake: Geoengineering.

The idea behind geoengineering is to combat man-made climate change with man-made solutions, mostly involving ways to pull carbon out of the atmosphere or to deflect the sun’s rays so the carbon dioxide has less heat to trap. The ideas are largely untested and highly controversial. They also involve tackling major technological challenges, some of which may be too great to overcome.   *** Continue

Department of Homeland Security Assembling Secret Assassination Squads in American Cities? 2

Veterans Today Logo

Sunday, June 30th, 2013 | Posted by

DHS Secret Assassination Squads ?

Has the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assembled “Top Secret” Assassination Squads in every major American city?

DHS and AR-15 Assault Rifle

If so, do these squads now employ the use of special Lapua .338 Magnum bolt action sniper rifles with silencers and are they part of a sophisticated plan featuring the use of ”decapitation lists” to assassinate top politicians, legislators, police, judiciary, and any dissident or Patriot on their MIAC type lists?

Is DHS now morphing into a new Bolshevik style Cheka, preparing to deploy mass murder and “Red Terror” in America?

Now tell me this, who are the real American Terrorists?

As many know, DHS has distributed numerous watch lists for the police and it is alleged that these have been prepared by the ADL. These lists now feature the following groups in order of alleged domestic terror threats:  Evangelical Christians, Catholics, Vets, Tea Party Members, Ron Paul supporters, Patriots, Constitutionalists, gun owners, tax protesters, etc.

I know quite a few people in these categories and none are violent, none have police records nor could ever pose any threat as a potential domestic terrorists.  I do believe however that those who prepare and distribute these lists are terrorists and have been involved in numerous gladio style false flag stage events such as Murrah, First Trade Center Bombing, the 9-11-01 inside-job false flag attacks, Aurora, Sikh Temple, Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon false-flag “bombing”.

DHS has been ordering, acquiring and stockpiling massive quantities of arms and ammo including approximately 2 billion rounds of ammo (most of which are hollow points, illegal for wartime use, thus for targeting of civilians only), 2700 armored cars, 30,000 armed drones and 2700 fully automatic M-16 assault rifles.   *** contune

TV Station Reporter Slows Down Video Playback To Reveal UFO’s Reply

KDVR FOX 31 Denver header

Mile High Mystery Pt. 1

Keep in mind that several Military Contractors are based in the Denver Area.  And the esteemed Air Force Academy wrote the book on “Chemtrails in 1990 as a chemistry manual  for new cadets and future jet pilots. *** full story

Mile High Mystery Pt. 2


KDVR TV in Denver Reports 2008 Story on Chemtrails Reply

KDVR FOX 31 Denver header

Interesting video from 2008 shows Joe Golden denying that weather modification programs are active.  He then challenges the KDVR reporter to call the FAA where Golden knows the response will be a total coverup.   Multiple agencies are involved in these projects and operate like secret societies and cults on covert weather modification and weapons programs. – programs that were initiated by NASA in 1966 (source)

In fact, it was Joe Golden who presented the Department of Homeland Security Project “HAMP”  Hurricane Atmospheric Microphysics Program) to the American Meteorological Society in 2010.  Golden claims to be a able make hurricanes either stronger or weaker depending on where the aerosols are sprayed.

Golden officially lets the cat out of the bag when he reports that aerosols are a potent agent in weather modification.  This admission further confirms that one aspect of the chemtrails operation is the covert manipulation of the climate to be sold to the public as “Global Warming and/or “Climate Change”.

Rosalind Peterson – USDA inspector –  spoke to the evidence in public documents that California’s drinking water is contaminated with toxins consistent with what is known to be in the aerosol spraying.

Department of Homeland Security Sets Up Aerosol Weather Modification Program at the same time Golden – then with NOAA – denied any such programs were active.   *** continue


Listen carefully as Golden spills the beans on the effectiveness of aerosols in weather modification

Related Stories:

Disinformation Campaign Presents Chemtrails and Geoengineering As Same Operation 2

The Truth Denied Breaking News

Chemtrails are not the same as geoengineering

The public has been hoodwinked!
by sucahyo on June 26, 2013

Before you begin to read this article, ask yourself a question. Are you familiar with how disinformation campaigns work? Are you familiar with the following  expressions? INTEL, CIA, NSA, ( CO)  Covert Operations, troll, shill, informant, deception, counter intelligence, and of course, disinformation?

If you are familiar, then I would like to point out the obvious in this article, that being Chemtrail activists were deceived by paid individuals who were hired to strategically place  disinformation right in the heart of activist camps.

Unfortunately, most of you are eating up the lie, that being  the propaganda that is being  spread about the science and technology of  Geoengineering  being referred to as  Chemtrails when it is NOT ! It is important to know that it is NOT one in the same, and  it’s time you did a little homework.

It is frustrating  that  so many people are  still referring  to  chemtrails as  ”geoengineering”.  This is disinformation at it’s best.  It is an outrageous lie at the very least.

Why is it so important to KNOW the difference between CHEMTRAILS and GEOENGINEERING?    *** Continue

CHEMTRAILS: Has Nanobot Mind Control Already Begun? 20

Nazi Naobots on your brain header

Comment:  This is an interesting post that reveals another dark agenda of this massive chemtrail operation inspired by US and German supporters of the Third Reich and made possible by post-war, Operation Paperclip.   Cliff Carnicom linked Morgellons syndrome to chemtrails in 2002 . Cliff’s work on neutralizing this self-replicating “bot” continues at the Carnicom Institute

The post-war sequence of events rapidly led to development of electromagnetic “weather control” under NASA and most every US government agency. This dark and fascinating history is echoed louder than ever in President Eisenhower’s warning about the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex. Read more to understand the history of weather modification, chemtrails and the insidious beginnings of the ” Global Warming” scare campaign.  Read the three bulleted articles on this page


Original post

What you see here is a nano-bot encapsulating a neuron or synapse (for example your purkinje neurons) or other nerve ending/bridge. It’s only a simulation, but accurately summarizes everything that has happened in the past decade. This allows complete control of the host (your body) remotely as demonstrated repeatedly in the movies (for example Metropia (2009), Ultrasonic (2012)). A more sophisticated set of nano-bots would and very well has subsequently allowed for a complete and full BioAPI to be installed without the host (you) even knowing it. If you want to get technical your neurons have been encapsulated, your synapses have been bridged.

“The basic idea consists of a set of nano-wires tethered to electronics in the main catheter such that they will spread out in a “bouquet” arrangement into a particular portion of the brain’s vascular system. Such arrangement could support a very large number of probes (in the millions). Each n-wire would be used to record, very securely, electrical activity of a single or small group of neurons without invading the brain parenchyma.” — source

What is the Purpose of Chemtrails?

Chemtrails are a huge logistical operation. Larger than the hoover dam, trans-alaska pipeline or moon landing. It’s large and expensive. The biggest mistake one can make is assuming there is only one reason for chemtrails. There are about five or six reasons and possibly more. The top six are listed below with a brief summary. This web site is concerned with the last. A visual overview may help by reviewing a flowchart here.

  • Blocking the Sun: This is the standard reason given to fools in the government. We need to secretly stop global warming, so keep it a secret that we’re spraying. Global warming is the catch all con for everyone in the government. If you’re smarter than this they’ll give you a better reason.
  • Blocking the Sun (Again): A reduction in sun light across the planet works well to decrease or manipulate crop yields slightly. This is part of the requirement to engineer a food crisis and bring in a famine. You can dismiss this.
  • Superheating the Atmosphere: In order to create earthquakes and steer hurricanes (for example hurricane Katrina in New Orleans) the atmosphere needs to be more conductive for electricity so installations such as HAARP (HAARP is just what they want you to see, HAARP has nothing to do with anything) can work their magic. So the chemtrails spray barium and aluminum among other things to create a more conductive upper atmosphere.
  • Health Erosion: As a side effect everyone’s health and immune systems become slightly compromised. This is usually not an issue for most healthy people. Older people on average will now die sooner and any health complication is slightly more likely to be fatal. This is both a side effect of spraying and intentional.
  • Climate Modification: To help or hurt crops, keep skies clear for a major event (like the Olympics), cause a typhoon, steer super storms, etc.
  • Nano-fiber Propagation: To universally install a BioAPI in everyone they need to spray nano-fibers. These fibers cannot be put into the food supply or given in some other way, the uptake across the population would take forever and not propagate very effectively. It’s much easier just to spray everyone like an insect; and because it’s happening to everyone the universal herd mentality of the unwashed masses then justifies it.



It’s easier to put the whole operation into a flowchart for a quick overview. Below shows the core purpose of chemtrails (which is nano-fiber propagation). There are other reasons for chemtails as outlined on the summary page, but nothing as significant as this. Mouseover the orange objects for additional information. Also see a simpler flowchart for targeted individuals. This flowchart and entire web site apply to every living person on the planet in one way or another.   *** continue


Chemtrail nanobot flow-chart

*** continue

NASA Discovers Carbon Dioxide Is a “Coolant” – Destroys Globalists Warming Myth 4

Veterans Today Logo

Friday, June 28th, 2013 (source)

Al Gore Lied  – Friday, June 28th, 2013

NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant

by  Bob Nichols

[Editors Note: Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum (Hammer's wikipedia has remained cleaned of his espionage history, despite it's being out over a decade now. You can guess why) was the financial and political mentor for both Senator Gores. So they hold the honor of having a top Soviet spy as a patron. Hammer's much advertised early Soviet business ventures (all of which lost money) were a cover for his espionage venture.

This was finally revealed when Prof. Harvey Klehr of Emory University here in Atlanta in his book, Venona, Decoding Soviet Espionage in America. The proof came from the Soviet archives when Yeltsin had them open for a few years. I was fortunate to spend an afternoon with him around ten years ago shooting two one hour Jim Dean Journals, one of them on Venona...and hoping to get this up on the Net some day... Jim W. Dean]


NASA gores Gore - it's just biz-ness - Global Warming is out is the Take-away

NASA gores Gore – it’s just biz-ness – Global Warming is out is the Take-away

(San Francisco) The United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lowers the Boom on Al Gore’s Big Lie that the humble, beneficial gas – CO2 – causes global warming. NASA states absolutely that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a Global Coolant and massively cools the Earth.

You can bet that the NASA scientists designed, built, launched and placed in Earth orbit the satellite machinery to prove it, too.

So, there we have it. In addition, the Earth has not gotten any warmer for 17 years. NASA has finally pulled the plug on Gore’s Big Lie and ended the gigantic, world wide charade on CO2.

This “discovery” about CO2 is nothing new, it’s well known by scientists not employed by the Gore-istas. The Gore-istas probably know it, too; but the money was just too good to pass up. Besides, you don’t have to do anything except sit around, make up wild stories and tell lies. Great “job” if you like that sort of thing.

Why did Gore do it?

If you follow the money, Gore, a career politician, now has a net worth of about $200 million to $300 million dollars, conservatively. That is a stratospheric increase from about $1 million dollars in the year 2000.

They say all politics is local and if we look around in Gore’s home state of Tennessee, there are many Tennessee companies, both private and governmental, that owe their existence to Gore Jr. or his dad, Gore Sr.

US Businessweek's Cover - Watch how fast they ditch Gore and change their tune,

US Businessweek’s Cover – Watch how fast they ditch Gore and change their tune.

Both father and son were elected United States Senators from Tennessee and brought home the “bacon” for many companies and home state jobs. Both were the “go to” politician for various “political problems” of the sponsored companies and industries.

Nothing unusual there, many Senators see that as just part of their job as privatized public servants. In other words, they are bought and paid for many times over as they sell themselves for campaign cash. It’s a devil’s bargain.

Senators on the make have no concern whatsoever for what they are privately hired to do on government time; but, the results can disastrously boomerang on the country and world. Especially so in the very particular cases of the United States nuclear weapons programs (the nuker program.)

The high sounding Toronto Protocol of the United Nations was simply to phase out the use of CFCs word wide. CFC is an abbreviation for a chemical refrigerant manufactured, at the time, by the rich and powerful DuPont Company.

It is used in cooling systems like refrigerators and air conditioners. CFCs are responsible for killing the Ozone over Antarctica all the way to Australia. Ozone is essential to life on Earth since it blocks deadly Ultraviolet Rays from our Sun and makes the Earth habitable.

Pro-Nukers: Deadly when their Livelihoods are threatened

As far as the Nuke Labs were concerned, though, the Toronto Protocol was a poisoned dagger held to the throat of the entire US Nuclear Weapons Program by its sneaky world wide enemies.

Making uranium suitable for nuke weapons and reactor fuel rods is really hot nasty work. It requires many thousands of “tons” of air conditioning for cooling the machinery, uranium, buildings, computers and people. The air conditioning equipment in the uranium plants is saturated by Uranium Dust and impossible to work on. When it leaks CFC refrigerant gas; it just leaks.

The “close enough for government work” non-solution was to back CFC refrigerant tanker trucks up to the back of the plants and dump as much CFC as was needed into the broken machinery to try to keep it working, leaks and all.

One nuke plant was internationally known to be the point source of 55% of the CFC released to the air in North America. The nuke boys had a serious problem.

The alternative was to shut down the US Nuclear Weapons Program. That would never do. Because of these easy to follow reasons the Nuke Program and the nuclear jobs were in jeopardy from the nuke killing Toronto Protocol on CFCs.

Closing the nuker program down was a non-starter for political reasons. US World Domination is based on thousands of nuclear weapons and the willingness to use them on humans. So, forget any do-gooder “treaties” killing the US nuke weapons program.

Money - The most powerful drug in America

Money – The most powerful drug in America

The threatening Toronto Anti-CFC Protocol had to be killed or sidetracked. The nuke boys would lose their cushy government jobs if not. Besides that, there was the US world domination thing based on the realistic Fear that the US Military would go Postal and blow another little country away.

Ta-Da! Al Gore to the Rescue of the Nukers!

The Nuke Boys needed a culprit substitute gas to kill the Toronto Protocol and a “Media Personality.” They decided to pick on the lowly gas Carbon Dioxide, symbol CO2; and Gore was the just the Man to lead the anti-CO2 campaign.

All that was necessary was to, literally, fool most of world. That and intimidate the rest. All people had to do was “To Believe;” or, at least not speak up. The finely crafted lie was that CO2 was a heat trapping “Greenhouse Gas” and was causing “Global Warming;” when CO2 is actually a Global Coolant. Not a problem for the New York Times and their ilk. They do stuff like that all the time and it works the same in every country.

Al Gore would be the lead “Media Personality” and was free to make as much money as he could. Above all else, the United States nuclear weapons program would survive and US world domination was assured.

Why Now on the NASA Press Release?

After many years of frustrating failed attempts, weapons physicists and scientists finally figured out how to separate the all important Bomb Grade Uranium from raw Uranium ore in 2010. The lightening speed at which the government moved to capitalize on it was amazing. The job uses far less electricity and makes a fraction of the heat

The US moved to build a new $6 Billion dollar building for uranium laser separation, closed the old plant and fired 1,150 dedicated nuke plant employees. The NASA announcement on CO2 effectively cut Al Gore loose and closed the curtain on the mythology of fictitious global warming; which is now changed to “Global Cooling.”

Welcome to your new world of Global Cooling! 

Copyright by Bob Nichols Jun 27, 2013. The article may be freely re-published with attribution and end notes. Videos and pictures are the copyright of their respective owners.

Editing:  Jim W. Dean


Gore Chemtrails is Conspiracy Theory GW is Real

Sources and Notes

1. NASA Study Proves Carbon Dioxide Cools Atmosphere Written by H. Schreuder & J. O’Sullivan, The Drudge Report, Monday, April 22, 2013.

“A recent NASA report throws the space agency into conflict with its climatologists after new NASA measurements prove that carbon dioxide acts as a coolant in Earth’s atmosphere. NASA’s Langley Research Center has collated data proving that “greenhouse gases” actually block up to 95 percent of harmful solar rays from reaching our planet, thus reducing the heating impact of the sun. The data was collected by Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry, (or SABER). SABER monitors infrared emissions from Earth’s upper atmosphere, in particular from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances thought to be playing a key role in the energy balance of air above our planet’s surface.” [Emphasis is mine]  Tiny URL:  http://tinyurl.com/ljyqxbz  http://www.drudge.com/news/167663/nasa-study-proves-carbon-dioxide-cools

2. NASA – The Report: Solar Storm Dumps Gigawatts into Earth’s Upper Atmosphere Short URL:  http://tinyurl.com/6rdou6x  http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/

3. NASA – The Movie. CO2 ScienceCasts: The Surprising Power of a Solar Storm http://tinyurl.com/mcxd683  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEFQHDSYP1I

4. How much is Al Gore worth? $300 Million, a conservative estimate. Al Gore net worth: Al Gore is a former senator, Vice President, environmental activist and entrepreneur who has a net worth of $300 million. Al Gore has achieved a lot in his years in the public eye, both in the public and private sectors. In addition to his net worth, he’s considered one of the most influential activists for the environment. Through his efforts in getting the word out about the danger our environment is in, he’s done much in the way of changing the conversation about the issues of global warming, pollution, and environmentalism. Gore comes from a political family, his father was a Democratic US Representative and Senator.

In addition to influencing Gore’s path in life, this is also believed by some to be the reason Gore’s call to enlist in the military during the Vietnam War was held up by the Nixon administration, so as to avoid Gore’s father getting any sympathy votes! Gore himself was eventually elected Vice President under President Bill Clinton, with whom he served two consecutive four year terms. Al Gore won an Academy Award for his 2006 climate documentary An Inconvenient Truth. Gore then went on to found the cable news network Current TV. Despite their low ratings, in December 2012 Current TV was purchased by Al Jazeera for $500 million. Gore’s 20% stake in Current TV earned him $100 million in pre-tax profits. Gore is a board member of Apple Inc, and owns $35 million worth of Apple shares. He is also the chairman of Generation Investment Management which has $7 billion in assets.  http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-politicians/democrats/al-gore-net-worth/

5. “Where does Al Gore live? Al Gore owns a 4,040 square foot brick-faced Tudor home in the Arlington Ridge neighborhood in Arlington, Virginia in 1977, a 10,070 square foot Greek Revivial home on 2.09 acres in the Belle Meade area of Nashville, Tennessee, and the family farm in rural Carthage, Tennessee. Al and Tipper Gore purchased a home in Montecito, California, in October 2009. The Italian Grand Style ocean view villa has approximately 6,500 square feet, 6 bedrooms, and 9 bathrooms. Gore’s two-story main house property features 6 fireplaces with carved stone mantelpieces, French doors, arched doorways, stone floors, a gourmet kitchen, two family rooms, and panoramic views. The home also includes a 3 car garage, pool, pool house, and guest house on the property.”


6. “95% of 26 GigaWatts” = 24.7 GigaWatts, This number is equal to 84,279,898,388 Btu/hour [I.T.] (or eighty-four billion, two hundred seventy-nine million, eight hundred ninety-eight thousand, three hundred eighty-eight Btu/hour [I.T.] Rounded number: 84 Billion Btu

And, it is equal to: thirty-three million, one hundred nine thousand, nine hundred nineteen HorsePower (electric.) Rounded number: 33 Million HP

7. Ozone Hole Watch: Latest status of Antarctic ozone  http://ozonewatch.gsfc.nasa.gov/

8. “Chronic inflammation, mutation and cancer,” Stephan Christen, Tory Hagen, M K Shigenaga, and Bruce N Ames, pages 35 to 88 in book. 319 references in one article.

9. C E Finch, Biology of human longevity. 182 pages of references. Amazon, http://www.amazon.com/Biology-Human-Longevity-Inflammation-Nutrition/dp/0123736579

10. Microbes and Malignancies, Infection as a cause of human cancers, edited by Julie Parsonnet. Amazon,   http://www.amazon.com/Microbes-Malignancy-Infection-Cause-Cancers/dp/0195104013


Related Posts:

Greeks Challenge ETC Group and Reject US Doublespeak on Chemtrails and Climate Change 2

Nsnbc header

Wayne Hall’s Blog

Wayne Hall chemtrails mugFFN,- April, 2013:   Wayne Hall, a Greece chemtrail activist, takes a look at how the US steers the discussion of climate change and geoengineering in a 15-minute video.

The surest way not to understand what is happening with geoengineering is to become involved in the contrails versus chemtrails debate. Rather than debate whether chemtrails are contrails, one should point out the parallel with what happened with genetically modified food production: the corporations and their laboratories and their lobbyists decide to introduce a change, so at the same time they start a public relations campaign to deny that any change has occurred.  *** continue


April 9, 2013 Video EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – Wayne Hall – Beyond Theories of Weather Modification Civil Societies Versus Geoengineering.


Global March Against Chemtrails

Chemtrails Photo of the Day 4


Chemtrails Manual printed by the Department of Defense for use  at the Air Force Academy for new pilot training.  Download Your Copy of the USAFA CHEMTRAILS Manual   ***More

photo of the day four Chemtrail Tankers Spray with no gapFour Jets release emissions that rule out possibility of normal water vapor contrails and consistent with aerosol deployment of “chemtrails”

Stunning Video Shows Commercial Jets Spraying Chemtrails

Photo of the Day

Key to Abbreviations:

  • RH = Relative Humidity = The ratio of current to saturated water vapor at a specified temperature and pressure .  When RH = 100%  it’s called “saturation” and occurs when the atmosphere can no longer support additional water as a gas before condensing into dew, fog or clouds.  It’s important for chemtrail spotters to know that  jet aircraft rarely encounter conditions of “saturation” to PC’s at normal flight level above 30,000 feet. More
  • CONT = Contrail = Visible and usually normal ice crystal formation produced by jet engine combustion and certain conditions of RH
  • CD = Chemdumps = chemical aerosols deployed by means other than jet contrails. A likely suspect is the Evergreen Air, B- 747 Supertanker patent design with large volume weather modification aerosol ejection system.
  • CT = Chemtrail = Persistent contrails containing chemical aerosols in addition to any water vapor that may exist.
  • PC = Persistent Contrail created under required conditions of high, near saturated RH
  • PCS = Persistent Spreading Contrails created under required conditions of high, near saturated RH
  • NC = Normal contrail in appearance but does not necessarily rule out deliberate chemical additives.
  • EM = Electromagnetic signature reacting with conductive properties of CT aerosols.
  • CH = Chemhaze = Amorphous distribution of man-made chemical aerosols.
  • GE = Geoengineering, a man-made attempt to control natural processes
  • WM = Weather/Climate modification
  • PC = Persistent Contrail created under required conditions of high, near saturated RH
  • PCS = Persistent Spreading Contrails created under required conditions of high, near saturated RH


Terra Sat 2-24-2013 Gulf7/24/2013 Terra Satellite

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA7/17/2013 Gainesville, Fl – CD and truncated CT

POTD USA8.2013194.Aqua.1km.coast+borders

7/13/2013  MODIS Aqua

POTD USA8.201 3194.terra.1km.coast+borders

7/13/2013  MODIS Terra

POTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_10

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_09

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_08

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_07

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_06

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_05

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_04

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails InsetPOTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_03

7/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails Inset POTD- MODIS 7-13-2013_027/13/2013  MODIS Chemtrails Inset



POTD_7-12-2013 Terra Sat

7/12/2013  Terra Satellite reveals 2 areas of chemtrails in the Gulf while ignoring the chem-dumps that dominate the geoengineering activity over unstable progression of  the front.


POTD -Terra Sat 7-9 Chemtrails West of Tampa

7/9/2013 Chemtrails and Aerosol Dumps  West of Tampa / MacDill AFB


Photo of the Day-1230L-7-6-20137/6/2013 1230 PM EST GOES Sat. – Video reveals massive aerosol deployments. Notice the aerosol blooms that remain stationary and/or move SE to NW (retrograde) in unnatural opposition to flow.

Photo_of-the-Day-7-7-2013-Gainesville_207/3/2013 wide-angle lens captures chemical sky

Photo of the day 6-29-2013

6/29/2013 Identification of normal clouds vs. chemical aerosol dumps and chemtrails

photo of the day -12-23-2012_cropped

12/23/2012 Numerous straight line chemtrails. Cotton candy clouds are actually chemdumps. Make no mistake – This aerosol operation is enormous and global. Click Here for more

Photo of the Day  - Chemtrails Pacific TS COSME 6-28-20136/28/2013: GOES-15 satellite reveals features of aerosol and electromagnetic climate modification over TS COSME and elsewhere in the Pacific Ocean

Photo of the day 6-12-20136/12/2013 Aerosol dumps and trails south of LA, Gulf of Mexico

Photo of the Day-6-11-2013 Gulf6/11/2013: Terra Satellite, Gulf of Mexico

Photo of the day sandy hook 12-14-2012
12/14/2012 Terra Satellite: The aerosols appear in a way that suggests they could have been intentionally deployed over the broad area of the crime scene and Sandy Hook school prior to the “event”

POTD Modis Jacksonville 11-20-2012

11/20/2012 Large, wide Chemtrail over Fl/GA border suggests System like Evergreen Air Weather Mod Patent

photo of the day 2-28-2011 unusual aerosol formation2/28/2011 Unusual aerosol patterns in Gulf and Apalachicola

Photo of the day 2-27-2011 Apalachicola chemtrails2/27/2011 Targeted chemtrails deployed over gulf coast and Apalachicola

Photo of the day 2-21-2011 unusual Gulf aerosol2/21/2011 Unusual aerosol deployment in Gulf with “artistic” features


Inconvenient Truth About Global Warming: Earth Has Been Cooling Since 2002 2

Gore Chemtrails is Conspiracy Theory GW is Real

Comment: Expectations by globalists that CO2 would be the major greenhouse gas to blame for warming the planet has met with huge scientific and financial disappointment.

Solar and galactic forces are now revealed to trump the CO2 effect of warming in either direction of warmer or cooler.  In case you hadn’t noticed, the UN/IPCC had to quietly discard the scare-tactic “Global Warming” to adopt “CLIMATE CHANGE” as a more nebulous reference to an emergent globalist “final solution”.

Climate Change?   Of course, the climate has been changing before mammals appeared on Earth

Aerosol and electromagnetic geoengineering projects (chemtrails/ionospheric heaters) intended to warm the planet and control the weather since the 1960’s failed to provide the expected outcome of elevated surface temperatures. The 1950’s CO2 theory of oceanographer, Roger Revelle and adopted by Al Gore, didn’t bother to consider the “unknown, unknowns” of galactic, Solar and Space weather influences.

But even if Earth’s surface temperature has not been elevated with Chemtrails,  ionospheric heaters and NEXRAD stations, these  weapons remain effective at engineering the violent weather of tornadoes, hurricanes, droughts,  floods and seismic events.

Furthermore, it’s a powerful advantage to be able to synchronize weather disasters with calendar events or as “weather terrorism” to distract from breaking government scandals.  Robust evidence exists from many independent investigators that Hurricane Sandy was engineered by the Department of Homeland Security under program Operation HAMP (Hurricane Aerosol Microphysics Program)

A little publicized public version of non-weaponized electromagnetic weather modification debuted in 2009.  The Aquiess Group uses electromagnetic radiation to move rain clouds over parched land masses in Africa.

Backing away from “global warming” to climate change” provides a catch-all term to describe any deviation from perceived “normal weather” as a manifestation of “climate change”, even though global warming could soon give way to global cooling.   Using “climate change” as the alarmists’ mantra, globalists stand a far better chance of implementing a carbon tax even as the planet retreats into 50 to 100 years of a mini ice-age.  ie: Simply blame the ice-age on “Climate Change” (formerly, global warming).

Finally, the perception of  “normal weather” is heavily influenced by the media and populace sources like The Weather Channel.  Anyone watching television is witnessing non-local news coverage naturally biased and edited for dramatic effect and ratings even when official statistics are closer to normal than what is perceived by watching TV.  Tornado chasers and meteorologists blowing around in a hurricane have added to the drama.  It’s little wonder that the Rothschilds acquired a majority stake in Weather Central, LP

The public needs to wake up to the mammoth contradiction when the UN/IPCC is determined to implement a Carbon tax while censoring any discussion of an obvious global aerosol and weather weapons program obviously doing the explicit work of covert “climate change”.

Al Gore mad nazi

  • Growing number of scientists are predicting global cooling: Russia’s Pulkovo Observatory: ‘We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years’
  • ‘Sun Sleeps’: Danish Solar Scientist Svensmark declares ‘global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning…enjoy global warming while it lasts’
  • Prominent geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook warns ‘global COOLING is almost a slam dunk’ for up to 30 years or more
  • Australian Astronomical Society warns of global COOLING as Sun’s activity ‘significantly diminishes’

As of 6/26/2013:  Global Cooling  predictions  

Many scientists in recent years have noted the recent global cooling and predicted many years to decades to centuries of more global cooling. Below is a sampling of scientists and studies on global cooling.

Professor Judith Curry of, the chair, School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, on June 14, 2013: “Attention in the public debate seems to be moving away from the 15-17 year ‘pause’ to the cooling since 2002 (note: I am receiving inquiries about this from journalists). This period since 2002 is scientifically interesting, since it coincides with the ‘climate shift’ circa 2001/2002 posited by Tsonis and others. This shift and the subsequent slight cooling trend provides a rationale for inferring a slight cooling trend over the next decade or so, rather than a flat trend from the 15 yr ‘pause’.”

UW-Milwaukee Professor’s Peer-Reviewed Study Predicts 50 Years of Global Cooling – January 2010: ‘A University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee professor is making headlines for his work suggesting the world is entering a period of global cooling. “Now we’re getting a break,” Anastasios Tsonis, Distinguished Professor of Mathematics at UWM, said in an interview with the MacIver Institute. Tsonis published a paper last March that found the world goes through periods of warming and cooling that tend to last thirty years. He says we are now in a period of cooling that could last up to fifty years.

Atmospheric Scientist Tsonis on record cold: ‘It just isn’t true to say this is a blip. We can expect colder winters for quite a while’ – Tsonis was flooded with ‘hate emails’ after 2009 peer-reviewed study predicting ’20 or 30 years of cooler temperatures’ — ‘People were accusing me of wanting to destroy the climate, yet all I’m interested in is the truth’

Russia’s Pulkovo Observatory: ‘We could be in for a cooling period that lasts 200-250 years’

New Study: Russian Astrophysicist from Russian Academy of Science Predicts Global Cooling: ‘From 2014 we can expect start of deep cooling with a Little Ice Age in 2055′ — Habibullo I. Abdussamatov, Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Science, St. Petersburg, 196140, Russia — Applied Physics Research, Vol. 4, No. 1 February 2012: Abstract: ‘We can expect the onset of a deep bicentennial minimum of total solar irradiance (TSI) in approximately 2042±11 and the 19th deep minimum of global temperature in the past 7500 years – in 2055±11.’

Flashback Sept. 2009: ‘Sun Sleeps’: Danish Solar Scientist Svensmark declares ‘global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning…enjoy global warming while it lasts’

Global Cooling Coming? Aussie Scientist David Archibald uses solar and surface data to predict 4.9°C fall — ‘Normal solar cycles are 11 years long, but the current one (cycle 24) is shaping up to be 17 years (unusually long), and using historical data from the US, David predicts a 2.1°C decline over Solar Cycle 24 followed by a further 2.8°C over Solar Cycle 25. That adds up to a whopping 4.9°C fall in temperate latitudes over the next 20 years. We can only hope he’s wrong’

Prominent geologist warns ‘global COOLING is almost a slam dunk’ for up to 30 years or more — ‘There is no single piece of real evidence that points to CO2′ as driving temps – Dr. Don Easterbrook: ‘We’ve had 27 climate changes in the last 400 years: warm, cold, warm, cold. There have been four in this past century that have nothing to do with CO2, because CO2 wasn’t a factor hundreds of thousands of years ago. We know that those are not at all related to CO2. So why would we expect climate change today to be related to CO2?’

AUSTRALIAN SCIENTIST PREDICTS GLOBAL COOLING: “SUN IS THE MAJOR CONTROL OF CLIMATE; LOOK FOR COOLING’ — ‘Prof. Cliff Ollier of the School of Earth & Env. Studies, U,  of Western Australia, recently presented a paper in Poznan, Poland,  in which he described the sun as the major control of climate, but not through greenhouse gases.”There is a very good correlation of sunspots and climate. Solar cycles provide a basis for prediction. Solar Cycle 24 has started and we can expect serious cooling. Many think that political decisions about climate are based on scientific predictions but what politicians get are projections based on computer models. The UN’s main adviser, the IPCC, uses adjusted data for the input, their models and codes remain secret, and they do not accept responsibility for their projections.” Download paper here

New paper finds that a solar proton event could cause global cooling of more than 3C — Paper published today in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics – Study finds that ‘a solar proton event, if it took place in the near future with an intensity similar to that ascribed to the Carrington Event of 1859, must be expected to have a major impact on atmospheric composition throughout the middle atmosphere, resulting in significant and persistent decrease in total ozone,’ resulting in a ‘significant [global] cooling of more than 3C’

Famed hurricane forecaster Dr. William Gray predicts global cooling over next 20 years

Geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook at Heartland Skeptic Conf.: ‘The main question is not will we have global cooling, it’s how intense will it be’

Dr. Easterbrook: ‘What we see now in the climate is nothing new 90% of 10000 years was warmer than the present’

Watch Now: Meteorologist Joe Bastardi on how global warming hype is hurting the economy & warns of global cooling

Sampling of scientists and scientific studies predicting global COOLING – Up until October 2008

[Note: Many of the scientists and studies cited below first appeared in the December 2007 U.S. Senate Report of over 400 (For Full Senate Report see: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport  ) See also U.S. Senate Report released in July 2008: ‘Consensus’ On Man-Made Global Warming Collapses in 2008 ]

Global COOLING Continues: 2008 So Far Coolest For at Least 5 Years Says World Meteorological Organization – ‘First half of 2008 the coolest since 2000’ — Excerpt: – The first half of 2008 was the coolest for at least five years, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said on Wednesday. The whole year will almost certainly be cooler than recent years, although temperatures remain above the historical average. […]  The global mean temperature to end-July was 0.28 degrees Celsius above the 1961-1990 average, the UK-based MetOffice Hadley Centre for climate change research said on Wednesday. That would make the first half of 2008 the coolest since 2000. […] Chillier weather this year is partly because of a global weather pattern called La Nina that follows a periodic warming effect called El Nino. “We can expect with high probability this year will be cooler than the previous five years,” said Omar Baddour, responsible for climate data and monitoring at the WMO. “Definitely the La Nina should have had an effect, how much we cannot say.” “Up to July 2008, this year has been cooler than the previous five years at least. It still looks like it’s warmer than average,” added Baddour.

‘This is going to be catastrophic’  – Brrr! Farmers’ Almanac says cold winter ahead – Associated Press – August 20, 2008 — Excerpt: Households worried about the high cost of keeping warm this winter will draw little comfort from the Farmers’ Almanac, which predicts below-average temperatures for most of the U.S.  “Numb’s the word,” says the 192-year-old publication, which claims an accuracy rate of 80 to 85 percent for its forecasts that are prepared two years in advance. The almanac’s 2009 edition, which goes on sale Tuesday, says at least two-thirds of the country can expect colder than average temperatures, with only the Far West and Southeast in line for near-normal readings. “This is going to be catastrophic for millions of people,” said almanac editor Peter Geiger, noting that the frigid forecast combined with high prices for heating fuel is sure to compound problems households will face in keeping warm. The almanac predicts above-normal snowfall for the Great Lakes and Midwest, especially during January and February, and above-normal precipitation for the Southwest in December and for the Southeast in January and February. The Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions should be getting an unusually wet or snowy February, the almanac said. The forecasts, which are spelled out in three- and four-day periods for each region, are prepared by the almanac’s reclusive prognosticator Caleb Weatherbee, who uses a secret formula based on sunspots, the position of the planets and the tidal action of the moon.

‘Global warming of the past 30 years is over’ – July 20, 2008 – By Geologist Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Emeritus Professor at Western Washington University, who has authored eight books and 150 journal publications. – Excerpt: Addressing the Washington Policymakers in Seattle, WA, Dr. Don Easterbrook said that shifting of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) from its warm mode to its cool mode virtually assures global cooling for the next 25-30 years and means that the global warming of the past 30 years is over. The announcement by NASA that the (PDO) had shifted from its warm mode to its cool mode (Fig. 1) is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes (Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007) and is not an oddity superimposed upon and masking the predicted severe warming by the IPCC.  This has significant implications for the future and indicates that the IPCC climate models were wrong in their prediction of global temperatures soaring 1°F per decade for the rest of the century.

Mexican scientist warns Earth will enter ‘Little Ice Age’ for up to 80 Years Due to decrease in solar activity! – August 16, 2008 — Excerpt: An expert from the National Autonomous University of Mexico predicted that in about ten years the Earth will enter a “little ice age” which will last from 60 to 80 years and may be caused by the decrease in solar activity. Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the UNAM, as argued earlier during a conference that teaches at the Centre for Applied Sciences and Technological Development. […]  Velasco Herrera described as erroneous predictions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), pursuant to which the planet is experiencing a gradual increase in temperature, the so-called global warming. The models and forecasts of the IPCC “is incorrect because only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity,” said the specialist also in image processing and signs and prevention of natural disasters. The phenomenon of climate change, he added, should include other kinds of factors, both internal, such as volcanoes and the very human activity, and external, such as solar activity. […]  “In this century glaciers are growing”, as seen in the Andes, Perito Moreno, Logan, the highest mountain in Canada, and with Franz-Josef Glacier, New Zealand, said Velasco Herrera. […] The prognosis on the emergence of a new Ice Age has little uncertainty as to their dates. The latest, according to Victor Manuel Velasco, could arrive in approximately two years. In another lecture he gave at the beginning of last December, the same expert had said that the cooling would arrive within 30 or 40 years. And in early July, Velasco Herrera said that satellite data indicate that this period of global cooling could even have already begun, since 2005. Original Spanish language website: http://www.milenio.com/mexico/milenio/nota.asp?id=651680 – Google Translated link from Spanish: http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.milenio.com%2Fmexico%2Fmilenio%2Fnota.asp%3Fid%3D651680&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=es&tl=en

Meteorologist David Dilley of Global Weather Oscillations and author of “Global Warming—Global Cooling, Natural Cause Found.” – August 25, 2008 — More Global COOLING Predictions: Meteorologist predicts ‘global climate will become similar to the colder temperatures experienced during the 1800s’ – Excerpt: Global temperatures have cooled during the past 12 months. During 2008 and 2009 the first stage of global cooling will cool the world’s temperatures to those observed during the years from the 1940s through the 1970s. By the year 2023 global climate will become similar to the colder temperatures experienced during the 1800s.

Australian Astronomical Society warns of global COOLING as Sun’s activity ‘significantly diminishes’ – June 29, 2008 – (LINK))  Excerpt: A new paper published by the Astronomical Society of Australia has a warning to global warming believers not immediately obvious from the summary: Based on our claim that changes in the Sun’s equatorial rotation rate are synchronized with changes in the Sun’s orbital motion about the barycentre, we propose that the mean period for the Sun’s meridional flow is set by a Synodic resonance between the flow period (~22.3 yr), the overall 178.7-yr repetition period for the solar orbital motion, and the 19.86-yr synodic period of Jupiter and Saturn. Or as one of the authors, Ian Wilson, kindly explained to me:  It supports the contention that the level of activity on the Sun will significantly diminish sometime in the next decade and remain low for about 20 – 30 years. On each occasion that the Sun has done this in the past the World’s mean temperature has dropped by ~ 1 – 2 C. http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/cooling_coming#35743 & (LINK)

Renowned Norwegian solar expert warns  temps may  ‘actually fall in the course of a 50-year period’ – [ By Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth and served as a referee for scientific journals. Brekke was the deputy project scientist for the entire international Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO). SOHO is collaboration between the European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA researching every aspect of the Sun. Full bio here: http://www.solarmax.no/pbrekke_en.html  and information on Brekke’s new book on the sun titled “SolarMax.” Here: http://www.solarmax.no/Hjem.html ] Excerpt: “We could be in for a surprise,” Brekke cautions. “It’s possible that the sun plays an even more central role in global warming than we have suspected. Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.” […]  “There is much evidence that the sun’s high-activity cycle is levelling off or abating. If it is true that the sun’s activity is of great significance in determining the earth’s climate, this reduced solar activity could work in the opposite direction to climate change caused by humans. In that case,” contends Dr Brekke, “we could find the temperature levelling off or actually falling in the course of a 50-year period” – an assertion that provokes many climate researchers. […] The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) has determined that the earth’s temperature has risen by about 0.7° C since 1901. According to Dr Brekke, this time period coincides not only with an increase in human-caused greenhouse gas emissions, but also with a higher level of solar activity, which makes it complicated to separate the effects of these two phenomena. […] Dr Brekke has published more than 40 scientific articles on the sun and on the interaction between the sun and the earth. (LINK)

NY Times Cites Possible Coming Little Ice Age! – Dot Earth Blog – October 3, 2008 — Expert: Some wonder if this could be the start of an extended period of solar indolence that would more than offset the warming effect of human-made carbon dioxide emissions. From the middle of the 17th century to the early 18th, a period known as the Maunder Minimum, sunspots were extremely rare, and the reduced activity coincided with lower temperatures in what is known as the Little Ice Age.

NEW JASON SATELLITE INDICATES 23-YEAR GLOBAL COOLING – Canada Free Press, 1 May 2008 – By Dennis Avery, Environmental Economist and Global Warming Co-author — Excerpt: Now it’s not just the sunspots that predict a 23-year global cooling. The new Jason oceanographic satellite shows that 2007 was a “cool” La Nina year-but Jason also says something more important is at work: The much larger and more persistent Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) has turned into its cool phase, telling us to expect moderately lower global temperatures until 2030 or so. […]All of this defies the “consensus” that human-emitted carbon dioxide has been responsible for our global warming. But the evidence for man-made warming has never been as strong as its Green advocates maintained. The earth’s warming from 1915 to 1940 was just about as strong as the “scary” 1975 to 1998 warming in both scope and duration-and occurred too early to be blamed on human-emitted CO2. The cooling from 1940 to 1975 defied the Greenhouse Theory, occurring during the first big surge of man-made greenhouse emissions. Most recently, the climate has stubbornly refused to warm since 1998, even though human CO2 emissions have continued to rise strongly. […] How many years of declining world temperature would it take now – in the wake of the ten-year nonwarming since 1998 – to break up Al Gore’s “climate change consensus”?

National Post: Global Cooling! ‘Spotless Sun’ prompts scientists to fear ‘dramatic turn for the worse’ – May 31, 2008 – Excerpt: ith the debate focused on a warming Earth, the icy consequences of a cooler future have not been considered You probably haven’t heard much of Solar Cycle 24, the current cycle that our sun has entered, and I hope you don’t. If Solar Cycle 24 becomes a household term, your lifestyle could be taking a dramatic turn for the worse. That of your children and their children could fare worse still, say some scientists, because Solar Cycle 24 could mark a time of profound long-term change in the climate. As put by geophysicist Philip Chapman, a former NASA astronaut-scientist and former president of the National Space Society, “It is time to put aside the global warming dogma, at least to begin contingency planning about what to do if we are moving into another little ice age.” The sun, of late, is remarkably free of eruptions: It has lost its spots. By this point in the solar cycle, sunspots would ordinarily have been present in goodly numbers.  Today’s spotlessness — what alarms Dr. Chapman and others — may be an anomaly of some kind, and the sun may soon revert to form. But if it doesn’t – and with each passing day, the speculation in the scientific community grows that it will not – we could be entering a new epoch that few would welcome. […] Several renowned scientists have been predicting for some time that the world could enter a period of cooling right around now, with consequences that could be dire. “The next little ice age would be much worse than the previous one and much more harmful than anything warming may do,” believes Dr. Chapman. “There are many more people now and we have become dependent on a few temperate agricultural areas, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Global warming would increase agricultural output, but global cooling will decrease it.”

NASA reveals ‘sun’s solar wind is at a 50-year low’ — could result in solar system changes (NASA press release) – September 22, 2008 – Excerpt: NASA will hold a media teleconference Tuesday, Sept. 23, at 12:30 p.m. EDT, to discuss data from the joint NASA and European Space Agency Ulysses mission that reveals the sun’s solar wind is at a 50-year low. The sun’s current state could result in changing conditions in the solar system. Ulysses was the first mission to survey the space environment above and below the poles of the sun. The reams of data Ulysses returned have changed forever the way scientists view our star and its effects. The venerable spacecraft has lasted more than 17 years – almost four times its expected mission lifetime.

We should prepare now for dangerous global cooling (By Paleoclimatologist Tim Patterson, professor in the department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University in Ottawa) — Excerpt: Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest Schwabe solar cycle of the past two centuries, likely leading to unusually cool conditions on Earth. Beginning to plan for adaptation to such a cool period, one which may continue well beyond one 11-year cycle, as did the Little Ice Age, should be a priority for governments. It is global cooling, not warming, that is the major climate threat to the world, especially Canada. As a country at the northern limit to agriculture in the world, it would take very little cooling to destroy much of our food crops, while a warming would only require that we adopt farming techniques practiced to the south of us.

Geologist Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Emeritus Professor at Western Washington University, who has authored eight books and 150 journal publications, predicts that temperatures should cool between 2065 until 2100, and that global temperatures at the end of the century should be less than 1 degree cooler than at present. This is in contrast to other theories that there will be a warming by as much as 10 degrees by 2100.  – Excerpts of sampling of scientists predicting a coming global cooling Geologist Dr. Don Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University who has authored eight books and 150 journal publications, announced earlier this week that he was putting his “reputation on the line” by predicting global cooling. “The average of the four main temperature measuring methods is slightly cooler since 2002 (except for a brief el Niño interruption) and record breaking cooling this winter. The argument that this is too short a time period to be meaningful would be valid were it not for the fact that this cooling exactly fits the pattern of timing of warm/cool cycles over the past 400 years,” Easterbrook wrote on March 1, 2008. (LINK)

Solar Cycle 24: Implications for the United States – March 2, 2008 (By Geologist David Archibald of Summa Development Limited in Australia is a Perth-based scientist working in the field of climate research. Archibald .wrote a scientific paper titled “Solar Cycles 24 and 25 and Predicted Climate Response” in Energy and Environment in 2006) Excerpt: I will demonstrate that the Sun drives climate, and use that demonstrated relationship to predict the Earth’s climate to 2030. It is a prediction that differs from most in the public domain. It is a prediction of imminent cooling. […] We have 29 years of satellite temperature data. It shows that the temperature of the Southern Hemisphere has been flat, with a slight increase in the Northern Hemisphere. Note the El Nino peak in 1998. Globally, we have had 10 years of temperature decline since that peak in 1998, with a rate of decline of 0.06 degrees per annum. I am expecting the rate of decline to accelerate to 0.2 degrees per annum from the end of this decade. That satellite record is corroborated by the record of Antarctic and Arctic sea ice extent over the same period. There is no long term trend evident. Most recently, there has been a 1 million square kilometre increase over the long term mean. This is a five per cent increase. […] The peak US temperature was in 1936, at much the same time that Total Solar Irradiance peaked. If you have wondered why US temperatures are still lower than what they were 70 years ago, the fact that Total Solar Irradiance is lower than what it was 70 years ago might provide an explanation.

Geologist David Archibald reveals CO2 is ‘tuckered out as a greenhouse gas’ – May 12, 2008 — Excerpt: The more carbon dioxide you put into the atmosphere, the more you are helping all plants on the planet to grow, and of course that makes you a better person. Virtue is in direct proportion to your carbon dioxide output. What of the temperature, you ask? Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, but the effect is strongly logarithmic. The first 20 ppm achieves 1.5 degrees of heating, but it takes more than another 400 ppm to equal that. By the time we get to the current level of 384 ppm, carbon dioxide is tuckered out as a greenhouse gas. From here, every 100 ppm extra may be worth 0.1 of a degree.  […] Surely a few more years of cooling will leave only the true believers in their misanthropic ideology, and the truly idiotic. […]  Not only will it continue, substantial cooling next decade is in the bag based on current solar behavior. There is a good correlation between solar cycle length and the temperature over the following solar cycle. Long solar cycles cause lower temperatures.

Canadian Climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball: “If we are facing [a crisis] at all, I think it is that we are preparing for warming when it is looking like we are cooling. We are preparing for the wrong thing.” (March 2008)

UK Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn: “There is no evidence that CO2 has ever driven or will ever drive world temperatures and climate change. The consequence of that is that worrying about CO2 is irrelevant. Our prediction is world temperatures will continue to decline until 2014 and probably continue to decline after that.” (March 2008)

Four prominent scientists warn ‘global warming out, global cooling in’- ‘Potential for a significant decline in the average mean temperature’ – July 12, 2008 (LINK) & (LINK)   – Excerpt: Four scientists, four scenarios, four more or less similar conclusions without actually saying it outright — the global warming trend is done, and a cooling trend is about to kick in. The implication: Future energy price response is likely to be significant. Late last month, some leading climatologists and meteorologists met in New York at the Energy Business Watch Climate and Hurricane Forum. The theme of the forum strongly suggested that a period of global cooling is about emerge, though possible concerns for a political backlash kept it from being spelled out. However, the message was loud and clear, a cyclical global warming trend may be coming to an end for a variety of reasons, and a new cooling cycle could impact the energy markets in a big way. Words like “highly possible,” “likely” or “reasonably convincing” about what may soon occur were used frequently. Then there were other words like “mass pattern shift” and “wholesale change in anomalies” and “changes in global circulation.” Noted presenters, such as William Gray, Harry van Loon, Rol Madden and Dave Melita, signaled in the strongest terms that huge climate changes are afoot. Each weather guru, from a different angle, suggested that global warming is part of a cycle that is nearing an end. All agreed the earth is in a warm cycle right now, and has been for a while, but that is about to change significantly. […]  We are on our way out of the latest (warming) cycle, and are headed for a new cycle of low (solar) activity,” van Loon said. “There is a change coming. We may see 180-degree changes in anomalies during high and low sunspot periods. There were three global climate changes in the last century, there is a change coming now.” […] Perhaps the best known speaker was Colorado State University’s Gray, founder of the school’s famed hurricane research team. Gray spoke about multi-decade periods of warming and cooling and how global climate flux has been the norm for as long as there have been records. Gray has taken quite a bit of political heat for insistence that global warming is not a man-made condition. Man-made carbon dioxide (CO2) is negligible, he said, compared to the amount of CO2 Mother Nature makes and disposes of each day or century. “We’ve reached the top of the heat cycle,” he said. “The next 10 years will be hardly any warmer than the last 10 years.”

‘Global Warming Will Stop,’ New Peer-Reviewed Study Says — Excerpt: The UK Telegraph reports on April 30: “Global warming will stop until at least 2015 because of natural variations in the climate, scientists have said. Researchers studying long-term changes in sea temperatures said they now expect a “lull” for up to a decade while natural variations in climate cancel out the increases caused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions. The average temperature of the sea around Europe and North America is expected to cool slightly over the decade while the tropical Pacific remains unchanged. This would mean that the 0.3°C global average temperature rise which has been predicted for the next decade by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change may not happen, according to the paper published in the scientific journal Nature.” End article excerpt. This significant new study adds to a growing body of peer-reviewed literature and other scientific analyses challenging former Vice President Al Gore and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen’s March 2008 presentation of data from the Hadley Centre of the UK Met Office found the Earth has had “no statistically significant warming since 1995.” (LINK)

Is there a cold future just lying in wait for us? – August 13, 2008 – Belfast Telegraph — Excerpt: Based on the past Armagh measurements, this suggests that over the next two decades, global temperatures may fall by about 2 degrees C — that is, to a level lower than any we have seen in the last 100 years. Of course, nothing in science is certain. Perhaps (though I doubt it) Armagh’s old measurements are wrong or perhaps there are now other factors, such as CO2 emissions, which may change things somewhat. However, temperatures have already fallen by about 0.5 degrees C over the past 12 months and, if this is only the start of it, it would be a serious concern.

Solar Declines Freeze Global Warming, Drops Seas:   – Excerpt: By John Zyrkowski, President, Lean Techniques, LLC, © 2008 – New Book: It’s the Sun Not Your SUV, St. Augustine’s Press © 2008 – Foreword by 2001 IPCC Reviewer – The temperature record tracks the sun’s decline in energy output over the past 10 years. In my new book, “IT’S THE SUN, NOT YOUR SUV,” using the Global Warming community’s own data, a conclusive proof is made that the zigzag historic temperature record is forced to change by the major changes in the sun’s energy. Using solar forces only from 1880 to 1960, the increase to 0.61° C in 1998 then the recent decline to 0.32° C over 1960 is accurately forecast to within several hundredths of a degree. This miniscule change forecast is as accurate as the most current data when compared to the sun’s forcing the earth’s surface 280°+ C over deep space temperatures (Chart 1). Other fits to the historic record can include minor influences of green house gases (GHG). Confirming the decline in temperature is a 28% drop in the level of the oceans since October, 2006 when the oceans increased by 2.3 inches over 1992. Since then they have declined to 1.8 inches according to Topex/Jason-1 measurements from Jet Propulsion Laboratories (Chart 1a). These are miniscule changes compared to the gargantuan projections by the Global Warming community. http://www.itsthesunnotyoursuv.com

Solar physicists Galina Mashnich and Vladimir Bashkirtsev, of the Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of the Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, believe the climate is driven by the sun and predict global cooling will soon occur. The two scientists are so convinced that global temperatures will cool within the next decade they have placed a $10,000 wager with a UK scientist to prove their certainty. The criteria for the $10,000 bet will be to “compare global temperatures between 1998 and 2003 with those between 2012 and 2017. The loser will pay up in 2018,” according to an April 16, 2007 article in Live Science. (LINK)

Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of Space Research for the Pulkovo Observatory in Russia, predicted the decline in solar irradiance is going to lead to global cooling by 2015 and “will inevitably lead to a deep freeze around 2055-60,” according to Abdussamatov. Abdussamatov was also featured in a February 28, 2007 article in National Geographic titled “Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says,” where he reiterated his scientific findings that “man-made greenhouse warming has made a small contribution to the warming seen on Earth in recent years, but it cannot compete with the increase in solar irradiance.” (LINK)

Australian engineer Dr. Peter Harris authored an August 20, 2007 paper entitled “Probability of Sudden Global Cooling.” The study Harris authored found that “the data…clearly shows the nominal 100KY cycle for glaciation and the interglacial phases and it shows that we have reached the end of the typical interglacial cycle and are due for a sudden cooling climate change. Based on this analysis we can say that there is a probability of 94% of imminent global cooling and the beginning of the coming ice age.”  He added, “By observation of a number of natural internal processes we can find further support for the coming change and I have referred before to the confirmed slowdown of the Gulf Stream, the effect of major endothermic polar ice melt and forecast reduction in solar activity after 70 years of extreme activity not seen for 8000 years before. The Stratosphere is cooling and ice is building on the South Pole. Climate is becoming unstable. Most of these major natural processes that we are witnessing now are interdependent and occur at the end of each interglacial period, ultimately causing sudden long term cooling.” (LINK) & (LINK)

A cold spell soon to replace global warming (Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, is staff researcher of the Oceanology Institute.) – Excerpt: Stock up on fur coats and felt boots! This is my paradoxical advice to the warm world. Earth is now at the peak of one of its passing warm spells. It started in the 17th century when there was no industrial influence on the climate to speak of and no such thing as the hothouse effect. The current warming is evidently a natural process and utterly independent of hothouse gases. […] Carbon dioxide is not to blame for global climate change. Solar activity is many times more powerful than the energy produced by the whole of humankind. Man’s influence on nature is a drop in the ocean.

Global Cooling is Imminent! (By Meteorologist Jim Clark of Florida’s WZVN-TV ABC 7) – Excerpt: It was about this time (1990’s) that Dr. Bill Gray, the famed hurricane climatologist, began speaking out against the global warming crisis at the National Hurricane Conferences.  He didn’t just stop at criticizing the scary climate models, but went so far as to predict GLOBAL COOLING in the first have of the 21st Century. Now, nearly 15 years later, it looks like Dr. Gray may be right!  The planet has not warmed over the last decade and climate factors seem to be lining up for a global cool down, despite the ever increasing concentration of atmospheric CO2.  The approaching ‘cold snap’ is not a global crisis, but when it is all said and done, we will likely have a better appreciation for the relative warmth we have enjoyed recently.

Hurricane Forecaster William Gray Predicts Global Cooling in 10 Years — Excerpt: “We should begin to see cooling coming on,” Gray said. “I’m willing to make a big financial bet on it. In 10 years, I expect the globe to be somewhat cooler than it is now, because this ocean effect will dominate over the human-induced CO2 effect and I believe the solar effect and the land-use effect. I think this is likely bigger.” Gray, 79, wasn’t sure if he’d be around to see his prediction come true. “I may not be around by that time,” Gray said. “But, I’ve asked some of my students to put dandelions on my grave if that happens.” Gray criticized NASA scientist and global warming alarmist James Hansen, calling him “the most egregious abuser” of data. According to Gray, Hansen’s alarmism is exaggerated because the models he uses to predict the increase in global warming count on too much water vapor in the atmosphere.  “[S]o he puts that much vapor in his model and of course he gets this,” Gray said. “He must get upper troposphere where the temperature is seven degrees warmer for a doubl[ing of] CO2. Well, the reason he got that was – why this upper-level warming was there – was he put too much water vapor in the model.”

Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and the first Australian to become a NASA astronaut, served as staff physicist at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), dissented from global warming fears, and warned of a coming ice age. “The first sunspot appeared in January this year and lasted only two days. A tiny spot appeared last Monday but vanished within 24 hours. Another little spot appeared this Monday. Pray that there will be many more, and soon,” Chapman wrote in a April 23, 2008, article tilted “Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh.” “There is no doubt that the next little ice age would be much worse than the previous one and much more harmful than anything warming may do. There are many more people now and we have become dependent on a few temperate agricultural areas, especially in the U.S. and Canada. Global warming would increase agricultural output, but global cooling will decrease it. Millions will starve if we do nothing to prepare for it (such as planning changes in agriculture to compensate), and millions more will die from cold-related diseases,” Chapman explained. “The bleak truth is that, under normal conditions, most of North America and Europe are buried under about 1.5km of ice. This bitterly frigid climate is interrupted occasionally by brief warm interglacials, typically lasting less than 10,000 years. The interglacial we have enjoyed throughout recorded human history, called the Holocene, began 11,000 years ago, so the ice is overdue,” Chapman wrote. “All those urging action to curb global warming need to take off the blinkers and give some thought to what we should do if we are facing global cooling instead. It will be difficult for people to face the truth when their reputations, careers, government grants or hopes for social change depend on global warming, but the fate of civilization may be at stake,” he added. (LINK)

Statistician Dr. Richard Mackey authored a 2007 peer-reviewed study which found that the solar system regulates the earth’s climate. The paper was published August 17, 2007 in the Journal of Coastal Research. Mackey predicted a coming global cooling in 2008. Mackey wrote: “The solar inertial motion hypothesis predicts that the period from about 2010 to 2040 will be one of relatively severe cold throughout the world. The hypothesis predicts that the emergent Sunspot Cycle No 24 will be quieter than Sunspot Cycle No 23 and just like Sunspot Cycle No 14, the weakest cycle in the last 100 years, which began in February, 1902 and ended in August, 1913. “Other things being equal, a strong geomagnetic field contributes to a warmer climate; a weaker field to a cooler climate. But the effect may not be uniform across the planet. Currently, the geomagnetic field seems to be weakening, contributing to global cooling.,” Mackey wrote on February 8, 2008. “The science of climate dynamics: continues to publish findings about solar/climate relationships and internal variability of the climate system that invalidate the account of the Earth’s climate dynamics presented by the IPCC; predicts the likelihood of an extended period of global cooling, if the emergent solar cycle 24 has a low amplitude, as seems increasingly likely on the basis of current science,” Mackey explained. “Low amplitude solar activity cycles generally result in a cooler global climate. Two or more such cycles in succession usually result in severe cooling. In the past such sequences have induced cold epochs referred to as little ice ages. There is increasing evidence that the emergent solar cycle 24 will be low amplitude and followed by one or two more low amplitude cycles,” he added. “If there is a period of severe global cooling over the next several decades as indicated by the science of solar/climate relationships and predictions of the next three solar cycles, there would be a 30 year period of far greater hardship than our ancestors experienced during the last several cycles of the quieter Sun,” he added. (LINK) & http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/why_sceptical_scientists_do_it_tougher/  & http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/pdf/ICS176.pdf

UN Scientist & Professor Dr. Will J.R. Alexander, Emeritus of the Department of Civil and Biosystems Engineering at the University of Pretoria in South Africa and a former member of the United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters. “This whole climate change issue is rapidly disintegrating. From now onwards climate alarmists will be on the retreat. […] All indications are that we are now on the threshold of global cooling associated with the second and less active solar cycle.” – May 2, 2008 – (LINK) http://www.climatescience.org.nz/images/PDFs/alexwjr.2-3.5.08.pdf

Atmospheric Scientist Tennekes: ‘Sun may cause some cooling’ – ‘No evidence at all for catastrophic global warming’  – July 14, 2008 (By Atmospheric scientist Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, a scientific pioneer in the development of numerical weather prediction and former director of research at The Netherlands’ Royal National Meteorological Institute.) (LINK)

U.S Army Chief Scientist Says Sun, Not Man, Is Causing Climate Change – June 3, 2008 (Dr. Bruce West, Chief Scientist, Mathematical & Information Science Directorate, Army Research Office)

[Note: Dr. West co-authored a March 2008 scientific analysis Nicola Scafetta showing the Sun “could account for as much as 69% of the increase in Earth's average temperature” (LINK) & (LINK) ]

Excerpt: The Army is weighing in on the global warming debate, claiming that climate change is not man-made.  Instead, Dr. Bruce West, with the Army Research Office, argues that “changes in the earth’s average surface temperature are directly linked to … the short-term statistical fluctuations in the Sun’s irradiance and the longer-term solar cycles.” In an advisory to bloggers entitled “Global Warming: Fact of Fiction [sic],” an Army public affairs official promoted a conference call with West about “the causes of global warming, and how it may not be caused by the common indicates [sic] some scientists and the media are indicating.”  In the March, 2008 issue of Physics Today, West, the chief scientist of the Army Research Office’s mathematical and information science directorate, wrote that “the Sun’s turbulent dynamics” are linked with the Earth’s complex ecosystem. These connections are what is heating up the planet. “The Sun could account for as much as 69 percent of the increase in Earth’s average temperature,” West noted. […]  He argues that these groups have done a poor job modeling the Sun’s impact, however, and that’s why they have “significantly over-estimated” the “anthropogenic contribution to global warming.” […]  Global Warming: Fact of Fiction – 11 AM Thursday, June 5 – Is global warming really caused by humans, or is it simply the result of different aspects of the sun’s dynamics? Dr. Bruce West, Chief Scientist, Mathematical & Information Science Directorate, Army Research Office, will discuss the causes of global warming, and how it may not be caused by the common indicates some scientists and the media are indicating. Research conducted by Dr. West contends that the changes in the earth’s average surface temperature are directly linked to two distinctly different aspects of the sun’s dynamics: the short-term statistical fluctuations in the Sun’s irradiance and the longer-term solar cycles. Please reply to this message if you are interested in participating. Lindy Kyzer – Public Affairs Specialist – Media Relations Division – Office of the Chief of Public Affairs – Department of the Army http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/06/army-vs-global.html

New Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Arctic COOLING Over last 1500 years! – Feb 5, 2008 – Published in Climate Dynamics on 30 January 2008 (LINK)

Ivy League Geologist Explains that Earth is currently in one of coldest periods in History. Excerpt: Ivy League geologist Dr. Robert Giegengack is a professor of earth and environmental science at the University of Pennsylvania. Giegengack noted that the history the last one billion years on the planet reveals “only about 5% of that time has been characterized by conditions on Earth that were so cold that the poles could support masses of permanent ice.” Giegengack also noted “for most of Earth’s history, the globe has been warmer than it has been for the last 200 years. It has rarely been cooler.” http://www.phillymag.com/articles/science_al_gore_is_a_greenhouse_gasbag & http://icecap.us/index.php/go/political-climate/al_gore_is_a_greenhouse_gasbag/

Artificial Climate Change, Droughts and Floods Caused by Chemtrails and Weather Modification 3

US Drought Monitor 6-18-2013

Comment: Headline today 6/26/2013:  “Extreme Weather Tied To Unusual Jet Stream”

“Scientists say that big river of air high above Earth that dictates much of the weather for the Northern Hemisphere has been unusually erratic the past few years”. – (AP science writer)

This is nothing new to the many citizen investigators who have understand for years how electromagnetic beams acting as ionospheric heaters can move jet streams around.  Warm air can be artificially drawn into arctic regions and unstable weather can be engineered into deadly tornadoes and hurricanes.  All this is facilitated with artificial metallic clouds dumped into the atmosphere or sprayed by jet aircraft.   Contrary to disinformation propaganda, the Air Force Academy first used and published the word chemtrails in the early 1990’s.  — Hsaive


Global Geoengineering – The Ever Changing Experiment

June 25, 2013

Dane Wigington

It is a challenge to predict the outcome of experiments that are being constantly altered. The saturation of the atmosphere with particles has specific and well documented effects. It forces a complete disruption of the hydrological cycle with a tendency toward CAUSING DROUGHT overall.

Numerous geoengineering patents state the expressed goal of creating artificial cloud cover by spraying nano particles of aluminum, barium, and other heavy metals into the stratosphere and/or troposphere.The ongoing saturation of the atmosphere with these moisture absorbing nano particles (desiccants) has created protracted drought in many regions around the globe. Blocking a percentage of the suns’ direct rays (GLOBAL DIMMING) is an expressed goal of the geoengineers.  However, if the sprayed materials change, if the size of the particulates change, if the atmosphere becomes too overly saturated with moisture, or if there is a temporary reduction in the spraying, the outcome changes. Regions that have been experiencing years of protracted drought, can flip to constant deluge or vice versa. Nothing can be set in stone in regard to the ever changing experiment of global geoengineering. Currently, the WESTERN US IS LOCKED IN PROTRACTED DROUGHT while the much of the eastern US is receiving record rain. Moisture that should have fallen in the west is, in effect, migrated east by constant spraying of geoengineering particulates. Much of this moisture eventually comes down in the eastern US. Some of the areas in the east that are now receiving record rain had record drought only a year ago. Europe is also experiencing “weather whiplash”, the DROUGHT AND FLOOD SCENARIO.

Changing Conditions

Though many still wish to argue the cause, the planet is getting warmer, and fast. As the planet warms, the atmosphere carries more water vapor. No matter how strong the drought causing effects of atmospheric nano particle particulates, DELUGES WILL INCREASE in conjunction with a warmer planet.

Atmospheric particulates and 911

The effect of the constant spraying of the atmosphere was truly REVEALED IN THE DAYS AFTER 9/11. The grounding of air traffic allowed a very unique opportunity to document profound atmospheric changes. There was an immediate increase in the clarity of the skies over the continental US, the daytime high temperatures rose significantly, and the nightime lows dropped significantly. This is exactly what would be expected with the temporary halting of the global geoengineering programs over our air space.

What Do They Have “Scheduled” For Our Weather?

The Global power structure owned “Weather Channel” has just released the long term forecast for the next three months (summer 2013). What do they have planned for the continental US? More of the same, or worse.

Blanket spraying of the Eastern Pacific off of the US west coast continues day in and day out. Any moisture that manages to make it over land gets heavily sprayed, greatly reducing the potential of precipitation in the Western US. If the constant spraying continues, protracted drought will only worsen in the west and the deluges in other parts of the Eastern US will continue. In the last 7 years, the exact location in Northern California where I live is almost 200 inches short of the precipitation that should have been received over this time period based on historical averages. The historical average in my location is 69 inches annually, we have received an average of about 40 inches a year during the last 7 years. The decrease in rainfall has correlated closely with an increase in the intensity and frequency of the aircraft spraying of our skies and off of the US west coast in the pacific.

The Bottom Line

Geoengineering is truly wreaking havoc with the earths climate systems, decimating the atmosphere, and saturating the entire surface of the planet with toxic metals and chemicals. Though the whole spectrum of human activity has done great damage to the environment and climate system, global geoengineering is the elephant in the room which is doing the most damage of all. Scientists and environmentalists seem all too willing to ignore or deny geoengineering, and the public at large has been blind to it due to constant media and societal conditioning. Its high time to break the mold of denial on this most critical issue, all is at stake.

Dane Wigington

Globalists Closer to Admitting Climate Change Caused by Geoengineering and Chemtrails 2

Chemtrails Pilots Header

World Bank: Humans May Not Cause It But Climate Change is Real

Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
June 20, 2013

Jim Yong Kim, president of the World Bank (WB) , asserts that climate change is real, regardless of whether or not humans are causing it.

In a new report published by the WB, while it may not be provable that human activity is the sole cause for climate change it is an undeniable fact that it is happening and the international community must force all governments to adhere to changes in order to adapt to the new global weather patterns.

Kim said: “If you disagree with the science of human-caused climate change you are not disagreeing that there is anthropogenic climate change. What you are disagreeing with is science itself. It is time to stop arguing about whether (climate change) is real or not.”

The WB claims that because global temperatures are rising, they threat of extreme weather will remain.

Kim asserts that the public opinion about climate change must be altered to accept this paradigm to avert disaster.

China was made an example of as a nation that must be made to curb their CO2 emissions by installing an international carbon taxing scheme to ensure that “China, the U.S. and the EU to agree on a price for CO2 we will have a market mechanism to fight climate change. I hope a practical solution will happen before 2020.”

*** continue

High School Student Presents CHEMTRAILS as Real Reason for Climate Change 2

By  Hunter Shanaida

Hunter Shanaida Chemtrails studentA class project on the electro magnetic spectrum gave me a chance to explain what this “Climate Change” thing is really all about and I wasn’t going to miss this opportunity; even if it was hard for me to get up in front of everyone, being the normally shy person that I am.

We’ve had “Climate Change” and “Green Sustainability” crammed down our throats in school, so I thought it might be time to find out where all this stuff was coming from and use the school to let people know what I found out. However, there still are some good teachers out there and I’d like to thank Mr. Olson for allowing me to do my presentation.

My dad says that our societies really went off the rails in the 70’s and it will be my generation that will have to set things right. All it takes is the power of one voice to brave up and say what needs to be said, to bring attention to the issues others are afraid to speak up about, to do your own research and investigations and see what is really going on around you.

You can hear that my classmates are awake, they know that something is not right with our skies, and if our politicians refuse to answer to us, it will be up to us to figure this mess out. Even if this whole thing is sold to us through geoengineering as “saving the planet” you should be asking “whom exactly are we saving it for” and why would we continue to allow an unnatural system that could be easily and rapidly weaponized, hang over our heads?

If your really new to this, you might want to check out a couple of movies called What in the World are they Spraying —- and Why in the World are they Spraying

Sorry, my dad has shut off the comments – he says that there are still too many people out there that have their head in the sand and would turn to rude comments out of their own fear.  He also said that this video would probably come under attack from the, what he calls – “Contrail trolls aka Con-trolls”

Take care,
…and remember, it only takes one voice to begin change.