CIA Looks at Destruction of OZONE As Future Geoengineering Strategy 1

Geoengineering schematicComment:  Putting aside the the past 25 years of covert, global atmospheric aerosol deployment (ie chemtrails), this future plan to destroy the OZONE layer with aerosols will assure a global disaster. 

Recent research by Dane Wigington’s group at has discovered lethal ultraviolet (UVB and UVC) radiation is reaching the earth’s surface due an already compromised OZONE layer due to decades of Weather Modification via “chemtrails” and various aerosols sprayed into the global atmosphere.  Wigington’s discovery points to severe and criminal under-reporting of lethal levels UV radiation by federal agencies.

Furthermore, the “official” IPCC atmospheric data shows no need for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering (SAG) since the earth’s surface has shown no warming in the past 16 years. Since the Global Warming hypothesis is now fully discredited why are agencies looking to deliberately destroy the OZONE layer when the Global Warming hypothesis is no longer valid?  — HWS


Aspen public radio HeaderGeoengineering: The Technological Fix to Climate Change?
Credit Kathleen Smith / Lawrence Livermore National Lab
Schematic showing the major geoengineering strategies in the scientific literature. Among those discussed in this piece are aerosols in the stratosphere and iron fertilization of the oceans.

You may have missed it, but last week national headlines read, “the CIA wants to control the weather.”  Those headlines came on the heels of the media learning the CIA was funding a report on geoengineering. It’s an idea that’s akin to a man-made thermostat for the globe.  Aspen Public Radio’s Science Reporter explains what geoengineering is, why you need to know about it, and why the CIA is involved.

*** continue

Why the Global Warming Hypothesis is “Unsustainable” 3

Why the climate models are wrong

Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Steve Goreham

CHICAGO, July 30, 2013 — Climate science is in turmoil.

Contrary to predictions by the world’s leading climate models and despite rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, global surface temperatures have been flat for 16 years. How can it be that the climate models are wrong?

Last October, the UK Daily Mail announced that temperature data from the UK Meteorological Office showed no global warming for 16 years. In December, an advance chart from the upcoming Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change showed a divergence between model projections and actual global temperatures.

In January of this year, the Met Office revised their forecast of temperatures down to almost no increase over the next five years.

*** continue

Experts and CIA Look At Ways to “Manipulate” Global Climate Reply

Climate change and geoengineering: Sheldon Glacier in Antarctica

Reuters: NASA: British Antarctic Survey

This photo, released by NASA on July 15, shows the Sheldon Glacier in Antarctica. Scientists are looking at geoengineering as a way to stem global warming.

MSN News 23 hr ago By Jodi Helmer of MSN News

Researchers are exploring ways to possibly change Earth’s atmosphere to counteract climate change. Will they work, and at what cost and what trade-offs?

It sounds like weird science, but experts — and the CIA — are investigating whether they can manipulate the environment to halt global warming.

Organizations including UNESCO, Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Federation have conducted research to address climate change, but current efforts to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are warming Earth are falling short. Two of the most vivid examples are the continued disappearance of Arctic sea ice and extreme weather.

Related: Economists say tax carbon emissions to combat climate change

The National Science Foundation reports that the planet is warmer than it’s been in the past 11,300 years, and if the trend continues, temperatures will rise between 2 and 11.5 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century.

Now scientists are suggesting geoengineering — large-scale manipulations of the environment to counteract climate change.

“The concept has gained recent attention as a possible backstop measure if other strategies, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, to counter climate change are not successful,” William Kearney, spokesman for the National Academy of Sciences, told MSN via email.

The NAS received $631,000 from several governmental agencies, including NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the CIA, to evaluate research related to two geoengineering technologies: solar radiation and carbon dioxide removal, as originally reported by Mother Jones.

Solar radiation attempts to use artificial methods to reduce the amount of sunlight hitting Earth. The methods could include releasing billions of aluminized balloons into the stratosphere to act as a reflective screen or using aircraft to release stratospheric sulfur aerosols to modify the amount of solar energy reflected from the Earth back into space.

As the name suggests, carbon dioxide removal seeks to remove the greenhouse gas from the atmosphere. The technologies for this include capturing carbon dioxide and compressing and storing it in geologic reservoirs, or adding iron sulfate to seawater to create algae blooms that absorb carbon in a process known as ocean iron fertilization.

Related: Climate change threatens food supply

The CIA is helping fund the research because the NAS also plans to evaluate “the national security concerns (that could be) related to geoengineering technologies being deployed somewhere in the world,” Kearney said.

In an emailed statement, Christopher White, a spokesman for the CIA’s office of public affairs, told MSN, “On a subject like climate change, the agency works with scientists to better understand the phenomenon and its implications on national security.”

Although the CIA and the NAS are tight-lipped about what these concerns might be, one researcher notes that geoengineering has the potential to deliberately disrupt the weather for terrorist or military goals.

John Pike, the director of, a Washington-based firm that specializes in addressing emerging security concerns, says that worries about the potential impact of geoengineering aren’t as paramount as the potential security issues that could arise if the United States doesn’t use the technology.

“A failure to engage in geoengineering could impact the political stability of other countries, and that could lead to trouble for the U.S.,” he said.

Other countries have already tried geoengineering. In China, cloud seeding, a process of dropping particles containing super-cooled water into clouds, where it dissipates and falls to the ground as rain, was reportedly used during the 2008 Olympics to force dark clouds to release rain before they reached Beijing.

As a means of providing “a clear scientific foundation for ethical, legal and political discussions surrounding geoengineering,” Kearney says, NAS scientists will be examining existing studies that have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Their goal is to gain a better grasp of what is understood — and unknown — about the technologies.

The project is expected to run for 21 months. All of the research is unclassified, and a full report, which will include recommendations for additional research related to geoengineering, will be available to the public when the project is completed in 2015.

One open question is how geoengineering could affect the environment.

A 2012 study published in Environmental Research Letters found that although solar radiation technologies could be effective in reducing the amount of sunlight that reaches Earth’s surface, the practice would not reduce greenhouse gases. In addition, researchers at Stanford University note that there are environmental concerns about ocean fertilization, including potential disruptions to marine ecosystems.

There also are concerns about the cost of these technologies. The research published in Environmental Research Letters found that it would cost $5 billion annually to put solar radiation into practice.

Investigators Discover Lethal Levels of UV Radiation Caused by Chemtrails Geoengineering 4

Dane Wigington

dane-wigington-mugWe have known for some time that the UV levels were getting rapidly worse due to the ongoing atmospheric spraying. Anyone that is even slightly awake and aware has noticed that the sun feels incredibly intense on the skin. Most varieties of plant life are showing at least some signs of stress in most areas. In many regions, whole forests are in steep decline. And it’s getting worse by the day.
Although extreme drought and toxic rains (due in large part to the heavy metal fallout from geoengineering) are taking their toll, recent metering of UV levels in Northern California indicate that there is an element in this die off that is far worse than we had realized, an incomprehensibly high level of UV radiation.
Geoengineering Is Destroying The Ozone Layer

Recent science study on excessive UV

With the assistance of a very generous and conscientious individual, purchased top-of-the-line UV metering equipment which was put in the hands of a 40-year environmental metering veteran, with 20 years government experience and 20 years as a private consultant. Our findings are far beyond shocking.

Agencies are telling us that UVB is only a minor component of the total solar radiation reaching the surface but our recent tests reveal this information is far from representing the skyrocketing numbers discovered in our tests.

Our metering reflects an exponential rise in UVB radiation.  Due to its high energy, its potential for causing biological damage to plants, animals, and humans is exceptionally high and even small increases could lead to significant biological damage. There are numerous peer reviewed studies which verify this fact.

Harvard Mdia Slide

Click Here To Enlarge

The “official” story on UV levels severely contradicts what we found in our tests.

According to agencies like WHO, (World Heath Organizatin) and a long list of other recognized government sources of UV information like NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), no more than 5% of the total UV reaching the surface of Earth should be UVB. The other 95% should be UVA. These agencies go on to state that UVC should be ZERO.

The Results of our tests contradict this assertion

UVB – the most lethal form of UV radiation – has now escalated to almost 70% of the total UV reaching the surface of our planet. At least this is the case in Northern California. (This can only mean that total Ultra-Violate exposure has also escalated sharply, making overall UVB levels worse still.)

In addition, our testing has consistently shown significant levels of UVC which used to be filtered out by the ozone layer, some 100,000 feet up in our atmosphere.  Not any more.

UV is measured in spectral bandwidths. The higher the bandwidth, the more benign the UV; lower bandwidths are more lethal.

Current testing reveals that almost 70% of incoming UV radiation is currently in the UVB and UVC range. (Not 5% or less, as we are being told by all major agencies and their media mouthpieces).

This translates into nearly a 1,400% increase in UVB as a percentage of total UV.  If UVA has also increased due to the same ozone destruction which has driven up the UVB, this would indicate a likelihood that the total UVB and UVC is higher still -not just a difference of ratio with the same overall number.

 What are the negative effects of excessive UV exposure to plant life? 

Photos show damage to vegetation likely caused by excessive UVB

In the forests of Northern California, bark is literally being scorched from trees.  On many specimens, only a thin strip of bark remains on the shaded side of the tree. Foliage is being scorched with many trees having only a fraction of their normal leaf cover. Many native species of plants are not even sprouting any more. The organisms that do still manage to grow appear miniaturized in some cases.

What are just some of the results of excessive UV exposure to plants?

  • Can stop sprouting of seeds,
  • Stunts growth,
  • Limb die off,
  • Reduced foliage,
  • DNA damage,
  • Changes nutrient distribution,
  • Mutations,
  • Effects photosynthesis
  • Greatly increased mortality

SOME known effects of excessive UV exposure to aquatic life.

 Phytoplankton accounts for some 30% of the worlds’ intake of animal protein. Phytoplankton and the microorganisms they consume are killed by excessive UV levels. (Global plankton populations have already been reduced by 40% to 50%. Much of the die off is likely due to increased UV radiation.)

  • All aquatic life is particularly vulnerable to high UV levels.
  • Less plankton = less carbon-dioxide absorption.
  • Less plankton = less oxygen production. (Atmospheric oxygen content around the globe declining rapidly)
  • Less plankton = less fish. Period.

Bottom line: A crashing plankton population effects the entire food chain and all life on earth.

Excess UV kills coral reefs. So do waters warmed and made acidic by CO2 fallout. (Reefs are the nurseries of many crucial aquatic species and are in sharp decline around the globe.)

SOME of the known effects of excess UV on humans:

  • Damaged immune system,
  • DNA damage
  • Damages sight
  • Causes various forms of cancer
Geoengineering Aerosols Destroy The Ozone Layer

This is not speculation, it is fact. There is a mountain of science data that confirms the ozone decimating effect of sunlight-reflecting particulates in the upper atmosphere. As geoengineering climate modeler Ken Caldeira warned after crunching the numbers for Dr. Edward Teller’s aerosol ìsunscreenî, the resulting rapid cooling of the stratosphere causes the formation of huge ice clouds that attract and concentrate ozone-destroying chemicals.

In addition, high nitrogen oxide emissions from fleets of aerosol-spreading jet tanker aircraft – and more than 93,000 daily airline flights – directly attack Earth’s protective ozone layer.

Though many of these “science studies” do not admit geoengineering is already going on, this fact is not hard to confirm for any that do even the slightest investigation. Numerous references are posted below this article.

At A Crossroad

The gravity of our collective crisis cannot be overstated. Current UV metering makes clear we are now being exposed to dangerously high levels of UV radiation, specifically UVB and UVC.
The metering performed in Northern California, on which this statement is based, was done by a pair of identical state-of-the-art, brand-new, science-grade meters guaranteed to be scientifically calibrated to a range within 4%. As stated earlier in this article, the tech who did this metering is a 40- year veteran in environmental measurement and interpretation.
Here in Northern California, we are already seeing frighteningly visible damage to foliage, trees, and plants. The ramifications of extremely high UV levels to all life forms  including us  are grave. As the die-off of other species go, so will we. We are in the 6th Great Mass Extinction  right here, right now! (References below)
If geoengineering continues unabated, and the ozone layer is completely destroyed, it will be game over for us all. No ozone layer = no life on Earth. It’s that simple.
  • Global geoengineering is tearing apart the entire fabric of life on our planet.
  • Geoengineering is poisoning our air, waters, and soils.
  • Geoengineering is pushing increasingly erratic atmospheric processes resulting from human-propelled climate change past the Chaos threshold into unpredictable, self-reinforcing, cascading events.
  • Geoengineering is disrupting the jetstream and all natural weather patterns, which in turn is fueling catastrophic climate feedback loops  the most dire of which are mass methane hydrate releases from the Arctic tundra and seafloor.
  • Geoengineering is destroying the stratospheric solar radiation shielding, which protects all life on Earth.
Do your own honest investigation and find out. Global awareness of these lethal programs is rising quickly, but not fast enough. Its up to all of us to help shine the light on this life-or-death issue.  Every day counts.

From Harvard Magazine

Harvard scientist

The Science paper notes that loss of ice in the Arctic threatens to release significant amounts of carbon dioxide and methane from the soils of Siberia and Northern Alaska, potentially accelerating climate change. The researchers also note that an increasingly cited remedy for climate changeógeo-engineering the climate by launching sulfate particles directly into the atmosphere in order to reflect sunlight away from Earth would accelerate the process of ozone loss by increasing the reactive surface area for the conversion of chlorine to free radical form, as was observed after the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991.

From EPA

UVB: a band of ultraviolet radiation with wavelengths from 280-320 nanometers produced by the Sun

UVB is a kind of ultraviolet light from the sun (and sun lamps) that has several harmful effects. UVB is particularly effective at damaging DNA. It is a cause of melanoma and other types of skin cancer. It has also been linked to damage to some materials, crops, and marine organisms. The ozone layer protects the Earth against most UVB coming from the sun. It is always important to protect oneself against UVB, even in the absence of ozone depletion, by wearing hats, sunglasses, and sunscreen. However, these precautions will become more important as ozone depletion worsens. NASA provides more information on their web site.

UVC is a band of ultraviolet radiation with wavelengths shorter than 280 nanometer.

UVC is extremely dangerous, but it is completely absorbed by ozone and normal oxygen (O2). NASA provides more information on their web site.


A Geoengineering conference was held in Canberra this week see here. Geoengineeringí is taking radical steps to dramatically and rapidly cool the planet. One of the ideas being discussed at the conference is to fire sulfa particles into the atmosphere, one professor has spoken out about this:

Professor David Karoly, of the University of Melbourne’s School of Earth Sciences, says another pie in the sky solution is to shoot sulfur particles in the atmosphere to shield the earth from the sun. He says that would destroy the ozone layer.

Ozone depletion would cause more UV radiation which would cause skin cancers  killing people, he said.

We know the mechanism for this, because it’s the process that affects the Antarctic ozone hole. Source: ABC Rural | 27/Sep/2011 *** more

More references, geoengineering destroys the ozone layer

6th mass extinction is now

Global aerosol depth loop (of course this source does not mention the main source of atmospheric aerosols, global geoengineering)

From a recent science study on excessive UV: Although UV-B is only a minor component of the total solar radiation (less than 0.5%), due to its high energy, its potential for causing biological damage is exceptionally high and even small increases could lead to significant biological damage.

UN/IPCC Global Warming Hypothesis a Complete Failure as Planet Cools 1

Occupy Corporatism header

Climate Change Debates Heat Up as Global Temperatures Slowdow

Occupy Corporatism
July 25, 2013

UN IPCC Global Warming  models now proven completely erroneous, show carbon dioxide is trapped within the Earth’s atmosphere.  However, the NASA satellite indicates that this gas is being released into space.

In 2012, study published in the journal Remote Sensing , co-author Dr. Roy Spencer reported that real data from NASA’s Terra Satellite completely contradicts the assumptions made by climate change alarmists *** more

Nick Begich Confirms HAARP is Shut Down For Now 3

Coast to Coast Header

Nick Begich Confirms HAARP Temporarily Shut Down

HAARP  Shuts Down During Summer Anyway

Alaska Dispatch Header

By Ben Anderson – 7/17/2013

Researchers with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, a frequent collaborator on HAARP studies, were able to independently confirm that the facility was indeed closedthe power and internet are currently off and the facility is unmanned.

“The facility has apparently been shuttered since June, the power turned off as HAARP waits for a hoped-for change in contractors to operate the facility.” … ”  The shutdown is reported to be only a temporary one, with the facility having been shuttered sometime between late May and mid-June.”. *** More

Nick Begich Confirms HAARP is Shut Down For Now

Nick Begich Mug-ggCoast to Coast 7/17/2013:  First hour guest, lecturer on new technologies, health and earth science related issues, Dr. Nick Begich, talked about the reported shutdown of Project HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Alaska. According to HAARP’s program manager James Keeney, the site has been closed since May, when Air Force funding ceased. Yet, Begich pointed out that this is not surprising, as the program has typically run intermittently. Additionally, he noted that DARPA has been involved with HAARP since 2006, and has funded $8.8 million for new research to be conducted in the fall and winter. “I think we can look at this as sort of a furlough,” where it’s being shut down for blocks of time to save the military money, he commented. source

Space Weather expert, Suspicious 0bservers gets it right on HAARP

HAARP is no longer the only ionospheric heater in operation

Get the scoop on HAARP operations from Jim Lee at REZONATION  …continue

Global Warming Fraud Helps Explain The Role of Geoengineering/Chemtrails 1

Great Global Warming Swindle Jet DVD Box

The Great Global Warming Swindle is a 2007 BBC documentary that exposes the fascist motives driving this global social engineering project.

The major “Swindle” lies in the undisputed science that CO2 rises have always followed warming created by external energies – like the Sun and gamma rays.

CO2 does not cause atmospheric warming – Instead, solar warming causes a rise in CO2:   Basically, the Sun and interactive galactic energies warm the atmosphere where the largest amount of CO2 is dissolved in Earth’s massive oceans.  The CO2 rise lags solar warming by the hundreds of years that it takes for the oceans to heat up to release CO2 into the atmosphere.

Volcanoes and natural sources have always released much more CO2 than any event caused by man’s so-called “industrial revolution”.

The Great Global Warming Swindle features testimony from many senior scientists describing both the fatal weaknesses in the theory of man-made global warming, and their failed attempts to bring these to public attention.

The warming of the past 300 years, it is argued, represents a natural recovery from a period which is known to climatologists as the ‘Little Ice Age’. This warming has been mild, beneficial and cannot possibly have been caused by humans.

Yes, humans have an effect on climate, but it’s an infinitesimally small pin-prick, compared with the vast natural forces which have always, and are still constantly pushing global temperatures this way and that.

The film is enlightening and disturbing. It describes how a fashionable prejudice was elevated to the status of unquestionable scientific fact requiring no more evidence than a “religious belief.”  It shows how, in an age we consider rational, reason can descend into dogma.

Global Warming is indeed the biggest threat facing the world today, but not in the way you think. 

Today we see media censorship of opposing theories – even physical threats, against scientists and citizens who dare question the IPCC’s unsustainable conclusions and over-reaching authority to impose sweeping global social controls.

The Sun

Heliophysics Flight ProgramOne of the most curious aspects of the global warming alarm is the persistent reluctance of some climate scientists to consider the role of the sun.

The idea that variations in solar activity, observable in the form of sun spots, influence the earth’s climate has a long, important history, stretching back to the astronomers Maunder, Herschel and beyond. It would be surprising, surely, if the sun did not have a major influence on the earth’s climate (why is summer warmer than winter?).

Among those scientists who are actively exploring the solar-climate connection there are different views as to how the relationship between sun and earth is mediated.

Names to look out for in research papers include Willie Soon, Sallie Balliunas, Eigil Friis-Christensen, Henrik Svensmark, Nir Shaviv and Jan Veizer.

An excellent introduction to the topic is ‘The Manic Sun’ by Nigel Calder, who recently also wrote, with Henrik Svensmark, ‘The Chilling Stars’.

Also worth looking at is Willie Soon’s short book on Edward Maunder.

Galactic Cosmic Rays and Climate by Charles A Perry - *** More


Secretly Warming the Planet While Pretending to Cool It:  The role of covert Geoengineering/Chemtrails comes into focus as we understand the massive IPCC deception that requires the hidden hand of covert, global weather modification program in order to impose a secret artificial and brutal climate change in order to convince that masses that, “something needs to be done“.

The Stratospheric Welsbach seeding patent for reduction of  global warming includes a frequently overlooked disclaimer that spraying these particulates can  increase global warming.

Welsbach chemtrail patent creates global warmingComplete Welsbach Chemtrails Patent US 5003186_PDF

Cliff CarnicomChemtrail observers with solid science backgrounds published data in 2007 to confirm that the Welsbach chemtrails patent would exacerbate global warming under any circumstance

Cliff Carnicom – Apr 27, 2007

Geoengineering Aerosols Warm the Atmosphere and Aggravate Global Warming – ***more


The compromised integrity of atmospheric sciences was noted in 1974 when contrails (condensation trails made up of water vapor) were re-defined to include any chemical  powder or aerosol.

Powder Contrail Generator-US NavyComplete Powder Contrail Genertor –  US Patent 03899144


CIA Funding Security Aspects of Government Study on “Chemtrails” 2

CIA 6in Chemtrails Logo copy

CIA Is Funding Government-Led Chemtrailing Project

Spy agency to help study “security impacts” of geo-engineering

Steve Watson –
July 19, 2013

The CIA is funding a scientific study to determine the feasibility of altering the planet’s climate in order to stave off climate change, according to documents released by The National Academy of Sciences.

The papers reveal that the project will run for 21 months at a cost of $630,000, with a final report due in 2014. The CIA backed scientists will study how weather patterns could be influenced and altered, and assess the potential impacts of geo-engineering attempts.

The NAS website notes that the funding for the study is coming from “the US intelligence community”. William Kearney, a spokesman for NAS, told Mother Jones that the agency in question is the CIA  ***Continue

Scientists Create “Neural Dust” to Facilitate Transhumanism 1

Occupy Corporatism header


Susanne Posel
Occupy Corporatism
July 19, 2013

Brain to Compuper transumanismResearchers at the University of Berkley have suggested implanting mind-reading “neural dust” into human brains to facilitate connectivity of man to machine.

If this dust were sprinkled onto a human brain, it could form an “implantable neural interface system that remains viable for a lifetime.”

This dust would consist of particles no more than 100 micrometers across that would be millions of sensors capable of measuring electrical activity in neutrons within the brain.

According to the paper, these sensors could be attached to the “tips of fine wire arrays” that could be inserted directly into brain tissue…. Continue

Geoengineer, David Keith Proposes Commercializing Chemtrail Spraying For Profit 7

David Keith.Lizard Eyes

Alien Terraforming Expert

“In particular, I believe there should be a U.S. government research program on solar radiation, how to manage it and eventually how to commercialize it.”

Has the Time Come to Consider Geoengineering?

Methods to adjust the planetary thermostat might prove necessary, sparking interest from researchers to government agencies

By Umair Irfan  | Thursday, July 18, 2013

Nature’s version of geoengineering includes volcanoes, like Japan’s Sakurajima, that change the climate by injecting huge, sulfurous clouds into the air. Image: Flickr/David McKelvey

Scientists are taking a hard look at tweaking the planet’s thermostat with geoengineering methods, which were once a taboo avenue for research, as a way to stave off some of the worst-case scenarios for the warming Earth.

Earlier this week, the National Research Council convened a committee to review approaches that could cool the world, with the goal of creating a scientific foundation that could help resolve political, ethical and legal issues surrounding these controversial techniques. Geoengineering refers to techniques that deliberately change the climate at scale, like dispersing aerosols and sucking greenhouse gases straight out of the air.

The researchers, gathered at the National Academies on a sweltering afternoon in Washington, D.C., laid out the immensity of the task before them. With the huge scale and threat of global climate change, many are now willing to consider ideas that once gathered dust on the fringes of acceptable science.

“We have no findings yet; we have no conclusions yet,” said Marcia McNutt, a former director of the U.S. Geological Survey, who leads the committee. She emphasized that the discussion was an exploration and would not reflect on what makes it into the committee’s final report.

“Geoengineering is not an easy subject to come to grips with,” said Richard Rosen, a climate researcher at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, one of sponsors for the study. “Some are advocating for field experiments now, while others have called the idea of putting sulfate aerosols in the atmosphere ‘barking mad.'”

Madness or a needed backstop?

The idea of meddling with the global climate through seeding clouds or absorbing carbon dioxide with giant machines is risky, but with two centuries of industrial emissions, humanity has engineered the climate already, albeit with looming disastrous consequences. In addition, while interest in geoengineering is growing, geoengineering data are lacking, creating a frustrating self-fulfilling cycle from risk-averse funding agencies that won’t finance geoengineering projects without better information and more accountability.

Researchers are also concerned about how geoengineering could fit in within the broader climate change response framework, whether it should be integrated into existing emissions mitigation and adaptation initiatives or if should remain locked away behind an “In Case of Emergency” glass pane. Some are worried that making geoengineering viable would create complacency in mitigating climate change on other fronts, like cutting emissions or displacing fossil fuels.

“I believe NOAA can play a leadership role in geoengineering research, but we hesitated in large part because of what one of you has labeled the ‘deadlock of governance’ in geoengineering research,” Rosen said, addressing the committee.

NASA, another sponsor for the study, is particularly interested in developing the science behind geoengineering and filling in its knowledge gaps, more so than in the techniques to implement it, according to David Considine, a researcher at the agency. “I think that NASA would be interested in knowing the answer to the question ‘What don’t we know?'” he said.

Robert Socolow, a professor at Princeton University and co-director of the school’s Carbon Mitigation Initiative, concurred. “The scrimmage line is not deployment; it’s research,” he said.

He explained that geoengineering strategies tend to center on either solar radiation management or carbon dioxide removal. Radiation management encompasses reflecting the sun’s energy into space with clouds and aerosols, while carbon removal includes industrial-scale capture devices, as well as planting trees and cultivating algae.

What should we know?
Carbon removal tends to be slower and more expensive but less risky than radiation management approaches. Consequently, Socolow suggested the committee should spend the bulk of its time investigating techniques that modulate the sun’s light and heat.

“It would be wise for the [National] Academies to focus exclusively on solar radiation,” said David Keith, a professor at Harvard University who holds appointments in the school’s public policy and physics departments. “In particular, I believe there should be a U.S. government research program on solar radiation, how to manage it and eventually how to commercialize it.”

Earlier this year, Keith called for federal guidelines on geoengineering research to rein in rogue experiments and to build up a body of potentially useful knowledge (ClimateWire, March 18).

However, many scientists are reluctant to step into this realm. “I spend a lot of time trying to convince a lot of people to start research,” said Jane Long, co-chair of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s Task Force on Geoengineering. “There is definitely more interest, but people are still uncomfortable for a whole lot of reasons.”

Though concerns about how the world will respond to a deliberately driven climate are valid, Long noted that these approaches are still very far off and investigating them would yield information that benefits geophysical research. “It makes climate science more robust,” she said. “We should not decide a priori we won’t develop an idea.”

As for the committee, Long said its report should call for further geoengineering studies. “I think the best thing they can do is highlight the fact that there could be more utility in these methods and that we don’t know enough about them and we should do more research,” she said.

Reprinted from Climatewire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC., 202-628-6500

Global Chemtrail Holocaust Now in Progress 1

Chemtrail Holocaust-14

Comment: I agree with Dane Wigington on the urgency of the issue even if I remain skeptical on relatively minor issues of cause and effect. – HS

Obama Geoengineering and Climate Change Coverup


July, 2013 Dane Wigington Interview on Jeff Rense Show


Dane Wigington –  Consequences of Geoengineering

Jun 20, 2013
“Droughts, Floods, and Disrupted Weather”

In this video, Dane Wigington gives a presentation in Northern California on the harmful effects of Geoengineering, declaring that there is no more critical topic today. The very essentials needed to sustain life on earth are being recklessly destroyed by these programs. This is not a topic that will begin to affect us in several years, but is now already causing massive animal and plant die off around the world, as well as human illness.

The debate over whether geoengineering programs are going on is now a moot point. We have more than enough data to confirm it. We have actual footage showing tankers spraying. The materials showing up on the ground are exactly the same materials mentioned in the numerous geoengineering patents and documents. Visit our website for a list of these government patents and documents.

Our skies today are simply not normal. Upon examination this cannot be denied. They are filled with nanoparticulates of heavy metals. But the skies have been filled with grid patterns for so long now that we are used to them and do not see them anymore. Sadly, the fact is that people do not look up.

To be clear, what we are seeing is not cloud seeding to increase rainfall. These particulates are designed to block the sun and move the jet stream. Dane explains how this is causing the drought and deluge being experienced around the globe.

Our atmosphere is nothing but a massive physics lab to geoengineering scientists who have no concern whatsoever about the consequences to humanity or any living thing, including themselves. The experiments are literally tearing the planet apart and destroying life on earth.

Dane reports, among other things, on:
• Geoengineering related climate disruptions, extreme drought and deluge
• Ozone depletion
• Methane release
• Drastic reduction in arctic sea ice
• Global oxygen content reductions
• Oceans on the brink of collapse
• Massive fish die offs
• 200 species becoming extinct every single day
• A drastic rise in Autism, Alzheimer’s, and Dementia
• Crisis level forest reductions
• The sterilization of soils making it impossible for plants to grow without Monsanto’s aluminum resistant seeds

Dane Wigington presents hard data which reveals what these catastrophic programs have done to our planet to date and what they will do if they are allowed to continue. Please take the time to watch this video, follow up with some investigation of your own on our site —, and share this information far and wide.

Thank you,
GeoengineeringWatch Staff

NASA Scientist Answers Questions About “Chemtrails” 6


Douglas E. Rowland NASA MugThe following is Sue’s phone conversation with Douglas E. Rowland from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Heliophysicist –  Laboratory for Space Weather.

Sue referenced and article that appeared in the Huffington Post “ NASA’s Independence Day ‘Fireworks:’ Agency Marks Fourth Of July With Two Rocket Launches”.  Her concern was the behavioral consequences of the rocket’s release of a, ” lithium gas compound designed to allow scientists on the ground track the electrical current wind patterns.”

The confusion may be that the more common “Lithium carbonate” is prescribed by physicians to treat mood disorders. “The lithium ion seems to alleviate mood disorders by affecting the way that brain cells respond to neurotransmitters.” (source)

“…and these chemtrails…there’s different kinds of chemtrails as you probably know…”

VISIONS (VISualizing Ion Outflow via Neutral atom imaging during a Substorm) studies how oxygen atoms leave Earth’s atmosphere under the influence of the aurora. Most of the atmosphere is bound by Earth’s gravity, but a small portion of it gets heated enough by the aurora that it can break free, flowing outwards until it reaches near-Earth space. The atoms that form this wind initially travel at about 300 miles per hour — only one percent of the speed needed to overcome gravity and leave Earth’s atmosphere. *** more

In the next video, Doug Rowland presents ‘NASA EDGE: Understanding “Auroral wind” with “VISIONS‘  Project.

Contact –  ph 301.286.6659

Miguel F Larson, Physics Professor at Clemson University – – Office Phone: (864)656-5309


Rowland-NASA Scientist on Chemtrails

(L.-R.) Spiro Antiochos, James Klimchuk, Douglas Rowland

From L. to R.,  Spiro Antiochos, James Klimchuk and Douglas Rowland – along with the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Science Investigation Team, not shown here – received Agency Honor Awards to celebrate their unique contributions to NASA’s mission.

NASA-Chemtrails Sounding RocketThe work NASA scientists and engineers conduct is often recognized around the world. However, it sometimes becomes even more of an achievement to be honored at home. That’s exactly what happened to three individuals and one team in the Heliophysics Science Division at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

Three heliophysicists—Spiro K. Antiochos, James A. Klimchuk, Douglas E. Rowland, and the Solar Dynamics Observatory Science Investigation Team recently received Agency Honor Awards to celebrate their unique contributions to NASA’s mission. The awards acknowledged their great collaborations to advance heliophysics, contributing to the young research field of space weather that tracks how energy from the sun affects the space environment around Earth and potentially disrupts space technology.

The Agency Honor Awards are granted annually in a ceremony at NASA Headquarters and at each Center. Considered to be the Agency’s most prestigious honor awards, each nominee goes through a careful selection process before the NASA administrator approves the final recipients.

The recipients were selected out of 73 individual and 11 group nominations submitted by Goddard’s Science and Exploration Directorate. Spiro K. Antiochos, a member of the Space Weather Laboratory and an internationally recognized astrophysicist, received the Exceptional Scientific Achievement Medal. This award is given to both Government and non-Government researchers who have produced key scientific discoveries or made key contributions to their field. Antiochos accomplished this with his theory about “slow” solar wind, one of two types of wind from the sun that directly affect the space environment around Earth. While a NASA mission determined that “fast” wind originates at the sun’s poles, the origin of “slow” wind had been a mystery.

By studying the sun’s magnetic fields, Antiochos collaborated with colleagues at Boston University to develop a model that shows the sun’s corona, or atmosphere, has corridors of magnetic field lines that produce the slow wind. Antiochos, who has been working at NASA Goddard since January 2008, said several research groups are now using the model to explain certain features in the heliosphere.

Antiochos said while he was grateful for being recognized with the award, he was even more grateful to his collaborators both in Goddard’s Heliophysics Science Division and in the outside community. “I could never have come up with the theory for the slow wind without constant interactions with observers and other modelers both inside and outside Goddard,” he said.

James A. Klimchuk, a solar scientist in the Solar Physics Laboratory, received the Outstanding Leadership Medal for his long history of scientific leadership serving both NASA and the international heliophysics community. The award, one of NASA’s most prestigious medals, recognizes an individual’s leadership efforts in advancing the Agency’s missions and acting as a role model.

Klimchuk received the award based on a series of leadership roles his peers have elected him to over the years, including the chair of the Solar Physics Division of the American Astronomical Society and president of the Space Physics and Aeronomy section of the American Geophysical Union. In addition, he currently chairs the NASA Solar and Heliospheric Management Operations Working Group, which is the primary advisory committee for solar and heliophysics.

“I’m extremely honored and delighted,” Klimchuk said. “I’ve worked hard to advance the discipline of heliophysics, and it’s very gratifying to know that those efforts are appreciated.”

Douglas E. Rowland, a scientist assigned to the Space Weather Laboratory, received the Early Career Achievement Medal, awarded to Government employees for unusual and significant achievements an individual makes in the first 10 years of their career. Rowland has worked in this lab since 2003. He received the award for his leadership of a team developing several instruments that measure gas interactions high in Earth’s atmosphere and how they contribute to its structure. Two of the instruments, –Firestation, which will fly on the International Space Station, and a Cubesat called Firefly — study how lightning in the stratosphere and mesosphere produce electron beams that serve as a seed population for the giant radiation belts that surround Earth.

“This award is a great honor, but all of our work here is really a team effort,” he said. “We have an amazing team working to design, build and test these instruments, and to analyze the data they return.”

The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) Science Investigation Team was selected to receive NASA’s Group Achievement Award. This certificate is awarded to a group of both Government and non-Government employees who together have made accomplishments that significantly contribute to NASA’s mission. SDO studies the sun’s interior, its atmosphere, called the corona, and the impacts on Earth’s upper atmosphere and nearby space environment. SDO project scientist Dean Pesnell said the team is highly deserving of this award.

“They have worked for a decade to build, launch, and run SDO,” he said. “The spectacular imagery and science we get from SDO are a result of their dedication and hard work.”

SDO deputy project scientist Phil Chamberlin said the team collaboration enabled its scientists to make some groundbreaking discoveries.

“It’s what NASA does enabling science,” he said. “It’s good for the people on the team to get recognized at this level to show they’ve done an amazing job.”

Though the different awards granted all stand for different things, all of them honor the collaboration that takes place between scientists at Goddard and throughout NASA.

“Science is definitely not an individual endeavor,” Antiochos said. “For me, these interactions are what makes science fun.”

For more information about NASA heliophysics missions, visit:   HERE

Claire De Saravia

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD


Climate Mafia May Soon Be Forced to Acknowledge Chemtrails Are “Real” 9

Max Bliss Header

Activist, Max Bliss recently traveled to Oxford to attend a meeting set to determine the final stages of the Governance for the Regulations on Geoegineering.

According to Max, the meeting revealed the awareness of the current geoengineering and chemtrails operation is well known by high level policy-makers including the United Nations.
Due to hisaffable but  out-spoken nature, Max was contacted by one of the policy insiders who reevealed information that confirmed high level awareness and secrecy about the global spraying operation.

The climate cabal is accutely concerned that public awareness has reached a critical mass of intolerance and anger in the developed countries around the planet.  The geoengineering managers are rightfully worried that public reaction will be severe since it is clear that chemtrailing breaks nearly every rule under the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)  and Joint Aviation Authority (JAA).

According to Max, the cabal may be planning to disclose the geoengineering operation to the public in the near future. Of course they will claim the secrecy was required to protect mankind from scorching temperatures, public panic and to keep global economies stable.

Max believes he has cracked the code of GE/chemtrail denial among the climate experts who should know better but who pretent to be blind to massive jet aerosol geoengineering.

Lord Mankton, S. Fred Singer and others campaign the globe preaching that global warming does not exist.   This road-show of AGW deniers would lose their argument if they were to acknowledge that jet aircraft aerosols were artificially keeping the thermostat low.

In the begining, Monkton’s group probably accepted that some of the CO2 and GHG argument was valid enough to be worrisome but still far from conclusive.   Hitching their AGW denial star to a secret geoengineering program provided a pair of loaded dice to work in their favor. But as the years have passed, the Monktonians have become even more educated and more skeptical of the GHG argument that could cause a need for geoengineering.

More significantly, the effectiveness of the covert GE/chemtrails project to cool the planet may already be eclipsed by our own Sun’s ability to plunge Earth into an imminent ice-age.

The global warming debate has so dominated the media that the real story about the future of earth’s climate remains mostly in science and technical journals.

In one exception to the rule, a recent science article in the Irish Times provides a comprehensive view of what the media has been missing:  Sun’s bizarre activity may trigger another ice age

An extensive collection of information is provided here

Video by Max Bliss:


Military Drone Armed With Explosives Crashes on Takeoff – Closes Highway 2

Drone QF-4

Comment: This drone is designed to explode on command if it “strays off course”. Little doubt the drone will also explode to murder a US citizen if programmed by the O-Bomb-U assassination thugs.


For the second time in a week, a Drone has been destroyed at Tyndall Air Force Base.

The latest crash came Wednesday morning around 8:25 when the drone crashed alongside US 98 in the Silver Flag area on the east side of the base.

Eye witnesses say the QF 4 drone crashed while taking off, exploded and sent up a large black cloud.

Base and local police and safety officials have closed Highway 98 and are anticipating that it will remain closed for up to 24 hours.

This closure is being done strictly as a precautionary measure due to fires resulting from the crash and a small self-destruct charge carried on board the drone.

The status of this device is unknown however, it is powered by a short-life battery which will be fully depleted in 24 hours.

Officials say the charge is used to destroy the drone if it leaves its pre-approved flight plan.

Officials say that because this self-destruct charge has not yet been activated, crews are waiting for 24 hours before they begin clearing the wreckage. After 24 hours, the self-destruct charge battery will die and crews will not be in danger of the device going off.

Motorist traveling from Panama City to Mexico Beach, should use Hwy. 22 east to Hwy. 71 south, and from Mexico Beach to Panama City Hwy. 71 north to Hwy. 22 west.

The last drone crash was last Wednesday morning when Tyndall destroyed a drone over the Gulf of Mexico south of Cape San Blas in Gulf County.

This crash was seen by vacationers on Cape San Blas.   (VIDEO from RT)

NO HOAX: HAARP Facility Shut Down Before Mid-June 3

ARRL Header

HAARP Facility Shuts Down

The updated story verifies HAARP was temporarily shut-down but will be back online with new management.  READ THIS


Source ARRL

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) — a subject of fascination for many hams and the target of conspiracy theorists and anti-government activists — has closed down. HAARP’s program manager, Dr James Keeney at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, told ARRL that the sprawling 35-acre ionospheric research facility in remote Gakona, Alaska, has been shuttered since early May.

“Currently the site is abandoned,” he said. “It comes down to money. We don’t have any.” Keeney said no one is on site, access roads are blocked, buildings are chained and the power turned off. HAARP’s website through the University of Alaska no longer is available; Keeney said the program can’t afford to pay for the service. “Everything is in secure mode,” he said, adding that it will stay that way at least for another 4 to 6 weeks. In the meantime a new prime contractor will be coming on board to run the government owned-contractor operated (GOCO) facility.

HAARP put the world on notice two years ago that it would be shutting down and did not submit a budget request for FY 15, Keeney said, “but no one paid any attention.” Now, he says, they’re complaining. “People came unglued,” Keeney said, noting that he’s already had inquiries from Congress. Universities that depended upon HAARP research grants also are upset, he said.

The only bright spot on HAARP’s horizon right now is that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is expected on site as a client to finish up some research this fall and winter. DARPA has nearly $8.8 million in its FY 14 budget plan to research “physical aspects of natural phenomena such as magnetospheric sub-storms, fire, lightning and geo-physical phenomena.”

The proximate cause of HAARP’s early May shutdown was less fiscal than environmental, Keeney said. As he explained it, the diesel generators on site no longer pass Clean Air Act muster. Repairing them to meet EPA standards will run $800,000. Beyond that, he said, it costs $300,000 a month just to keep the facility open and $500,000 to run it at full capacity for 10 days.

Jointly funded by the US Air Force Research Laboratory and the US Naval Research Laboratory, HAARP is an ionospheric research facility. Its best-known apparatus is its 3.6 MW HF (approximately 3 to 10 MHz) ionospheric research instrument (IRI), feeding an extensive system of 180 gain antennas and used to “excite” sections of the ionosphere. Other onsite equipment is used to evaluate the effects.

Larry Ledlow, N1TX, of Fairbanks, Alaska, said HAARP ionosonde and riometer data have been “invaluable, especially being more or less local, to understand current conditions in the high latitudes.” He said data from other sites “simply do not accurately reflect the unique propagation we endure here.”

To fill the gap, Ledlow said, several members of the Arctic Amateur Radio Club — including Eric Nichols, KL7AJ, author of Radio Science for the Radio Amateur and articles in QST — have discussed building their own instruments. “It’s all very preliminary,” he said, “but we really feel the pinch losing HAARP.” Nichols, of North Pole, Alaska, has conducted experiments at HAARP. He called the shutdown “a great loss to interior Alaska hams and many others.”

The ultra-high power facility long has intrigued hams, even outside of Alaska. In 1997, HAARP transmitted test signals on HF (3.4 MHz and 6.99 MHz) and solicited reports from hams and short-wave listeners in the “Lower 48” to determine how well the HAARP transmissions could be heard to the south. In 2007 HAARP succeeded in bouncing a 40 meter signal off the moon. Earlier this year, HAARP scientists successfully produced a sustained high-density plasma cloud in Earth’s upper atmosphere.

As things stand, the Air Force has possession for now, but if no other agency steps forward to take over HAARP, the unique facility will be dismantled, Keeney said. He pointed out that it would cost less to bulldoze the antenna field than it would to replace the 180 antennas.

Splashy web postings abound, blaming HAARP for controlling the weather — most recently in the case of Hurricane Sandy and the spate of tornados — and for causing other natural disasters. Quipped Keeney, “If I actually could affect the weather, I’d keep it open.”