“Fake Snow” More Likely To Be Chemtrails Polymers Than Ice Nucleation Bacteria 19

Online videos alleging “fake snow” are going viral but mostly for the wrong reason.

While it’s true that experiments with ice nucleating bacteria are carried out for good as well as nefarious reasons, the process does almost nothing to add or remove water from the resultant snow that falls on the ground.

The best way to see if the snow was nucleated is with a microscope to reveal the presence of one of 78 species of the Pseudomonas syringae bacteria – a gram-negative, rod-shaped, obligate aerobe.

Video demonstration shows how a protein from a strain of the Pseudomonas syringae bacteria can cause cold water to turn into ice.

Ice Nucleation Fake Snow Over Atlanta

See this story from Intellihub:   Proof: Massive snowstorm yields ‘fake snow’ signifying false flag weather manipulation or massive social experiment

Several videos at this site use matches, lighters and torches to reveal the snow has no water. But these tests cause the snow (ice) to evaporate into water vapor (a gas) before it has a chance to manifest as “water” (liquid)

“Sublimation” is the term to describe this:

Sublimation is the transition of a substance directly from the solid to the gas phase without passing through an intermediate liquid phase.”  (Source)

So if the snow is truly “fake” and can be demonstrated to contain no water, the source is more likely to be a polymer sprayed from a jet aircraft – and spider web type Polymers sprayed from chemtrails  are more likely to be the culprit.

Hide Tons of Bio-toxins Disguising As SNOW.

WARNING:  Don’t Eat the Snow and Don’t Drink the Rain

Sources and data:

19 comments

  1. The insanity continues unabated. The politicians, pretending to be either democrats or republicans, make deals and work together to bring about the destruction of America and the creation of their “new world order”.. Chemtrails are population reduction – plain and simple. They know what will result if they try to remove firearms from us – a blood bath – so instead they reduce our numbers, making those of us who survive easier to control.
    Once “obamacare” is implemented the funeral homes won’t be able to keep up with the dying populace.. Sound far-fetched? I tell you this – the process has begun. If anyone thinks writing their elected officials will help – you are being deceived. They are on the same team… All but a hand full of them.. There are a few GOOD people in DC, but not enough to make a difference.. The ones who balk at such drastic measures as releasing poisons from the sky are extorted by the ones in charge. The NSA has been keeping up with ALL the skeletons in the closets of the lawmakers, as well as the judges – both local and federal. They have left nothing to chance. this IS the end game, folks..

      • Because there is much more to this than simply killing people. Why should they have us drop dead when they can suck our bank accounts dry FIRST, by having people go to doctor after doctor.. filling prescription after prescription. giving big pharma more and more money.. THEN they die.

    • Matt’s blindingly obvious point aside, I’d like for you to explain, without yelling, what you think. What purpose does killing the citizens of America serve? There’s no REASON for a government to do something like this. A small collection of politicians on an empty continent will starve, they’ve killed off their farmers and producers.

      And if such a horrific concept like chemtrails actually comes to fruition for whatever reason, someone like Snowden will appear WITH ACTUAL EVIDENCE, not home video of spiderwebs and streamers. Snowden presented 200,000 or so documents to media, and has his hands on another 1.5 million documents with information detailing the NSA’s workings. If something as unthreatening as surveillance prompted someone to do this, then someone would leak details about chemtrails.

      “There are a few GOOD people in DC, but not enough to make a difference.. The ones who balk at such drastic measures as releasing poisons from the sky are extorted by the ones in charge. The NSA has been keeping up with ALL the skeletons in the closets of the lawmakers, as well as the judges – both local and federal”.

      By your argument, there are many politicians in DC of different levels who feel uncomfortable with the “plan”. It would make perfect sense for one of these politicians to leak details INCLUDING DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE to the public. Some coffee boy who overheard the word chemtrail in the office and ran to blog about it doesn’t count as _evidence_.

      • First of all, I am not much of a “yeller”.. not on the internet anyway –
        Let me start with the last part first, if I may.. The theory that I, and many others BTW, have formulated is that the ones who are truly in charge of this joint have dug up enough dirt on lawmkers of every level, that they can “influnce” their decision making. This is possible because of the various illegal surveliance programs Snowden exposed. All arguing aside, does the idea of the gvt watching, reading and listening to EVERYONE’S (supposedly) private correspondance not throw up HUGE red flags? WHY would they do this?
        Now about killing Americans.. it’s not just Americans, it’s the world’s population. The Henry Kissingers of this world believe that there are too many people on this planet.. too many people consuming too many natural resources (air, water, etc) and they feel these “useless eaters” should be dead. See National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled “Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests. Or the “Global 2000″ report prepared for president Carter. There is alot of depopulation evidence out there in cyberspace.. and in Georgia too!

  2. They’re at the starting gate. Starter gun goes off. It’s neck and neck. Evil is in front by a nose. The horse has kazillions invested…but wait…here comes Good…he’s racing beside Evil. It’s a right race…wait a minute…the stewards are saying that Evil could be disqualified…they’re saying Evil could’ve been doped…we’re nearly at the finishing line…Evil hears the announcement and pulls back…the Good horse wins by a nose. Those that invested in Evil have lost. Their bank balance is somewhat thinner. They don’t bet as much. The soldiers on both sides are ready to battle…..

  3. Pingback: Planet X News Daily Headlines for 1/31/2014 | Planet X News

  4. Pingback: Citizen journalists nationwide claim snow is fake. What do you think? | Planet X News

  5. Pingback: “Fake Snow” More Likely To Be Chemtrails Polymers Than Ice Nucleation Bacteria

  6. Pingback: “Fake Snow” More Likely To Be Chemtrails Polymers Than Ice Nucleation Bacteria | Friendbomb For Freedom

  7. if they trying to kill of population and have new world order thats bullcrap i dont think there is gonna be a new world order etc etc… with snow come on what about the rest of the year when warm? what acid rain people burn to death or something or melt i mean come on dont believe everything u hear or read especially on the internet…

  8. Wow, what a mixed-up batch of information in the above article….

    “The best way to see if the snow was nucleated is with a microscope to reveal the presence of one of 78 species of the Pseudomonas syringae bacteria – a gram-negative, rod-shaped, obligate aerobe.”

    …or natural atmospheric dust…..the most common way.
    The article claims “the best way is…”…but that is not true. That is only ONE way.

    Highly pure water may not ever freeze until -40*C. This is rare though, and usually only under controlled sterile, dust, and other ice nucleation-free conditions.
    The article posts its first video showing bacterial ice nucleation.
    Here is an explanation:
    http://scientificteaching.wisc.edu/old%20website/biologybroughttolife/Experiment_2_Bacterial_Ice_Nucleation_Teacher_Guide.htm

    In the above link it says:

    “First, most students do not understand, and initially will not believe, that pure water freezes at -40˚C. Someone in class is bound to say, “Don’t you mean 0˚C?” The problem is that most of us have been taught about the freezing point of water under equilibrium conditions, i.e., when there is an ice crystal present. Given a perfect ice nucleus in pure water, the freezing point of water is 0˚C. Most of us will never encounter really pure water so we will never observe water as a liquid below about -10˚C. Many chemicals and contaminants, such as dust particles, will act as ice nuclei at temperatures below -5˚C, though few are as effective as the ice nucleating bacteria, which are very active at -2˚ to -3˚C. So be sure to stress that the freezing point of pure water is -40˚C and that less pure water is unlikely to supercool below -8˚ to -10˚C.”

    Here is a simple explanation video…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ph8xusY3GTM

    The bacterium Pseudomonas syringae can indeed promote ice nucleation at an “easier” (closer to 0*C) temperature.
    Silver Iodide (occasionally currently in use, no secret) is another ice nuclei.

    But then the above OP article in question suddenly claims it’s none of that, but instead some sort of unnamed mysterious polymer.

    I find it strange that the article lays out tid-bits of researched science, but then concludes that it must be “unknown polymers”….for no reason at all, and no research to back that statement up. (??)
    If the “snow doesn’t melt”….place some on a hot pan, and see what happens.
    Campers, hunters, and woodsmen all know that a cupful of snow will always melt to a smaller portion of water.
    Where are the video tests showing that a cupful of recent snow, melts down to some kind of sticky/gooey polymer mess ?
    None.
    From the article:
    “So if the snow is truly “fake” and can be demonstrated to contain no water, the source is more likely to be a polymer sprayed from a jet aircraft – and spider web type Polymers sprayed from chemtrails are more likely to be the culprit.”

    • Not sure what point you intended to make with the super-cooled water video demonstration. But we can say with confidence that all the youtube novices attempting to prove fake snow used an open flame and even a torch to demonstrate not much more than sublimation.

  9. “Not sure what point you intended to make with the super-cooled water video demonstration.”

    It was noted in the article…the first video in the article. (the person holding a jar of supercooled water).
    I was just explaining it further, is all.
    More info leads to a better understanding.

  10. Pingback: “Fake Snow” More Likely To Be Chemtrails Polymers Than Ice Nucleation Bacteria | ingaorama

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s